Iliffe Steve, Wilcock Jane
University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 May;50(Suppl 2):63-67. doi: 10.1007/s00391-016-1175-1. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
The early and timely recognition of dementia syndrome is a policy imperative in many countries. In the UK the achievement of earlier and timelier recognition has been pursued through educational interventions, incentivisation of general practitioners and the promotion of a network of memory clinics.
The effectiveness of education, incentivisation and memory clinic activity are unknown. This article analyses data from different sources to evaluate the impact of these interventions on the incidence and prevalence of dementia, and the diagnostic performance of memory clinics.
Three data sources were used: 1) aggregated, anonymised data from a network of general practices using the same electronic medical record software, The Health Information Network (THIN), 2) UK Health & Social Care Information Centre data reports and 3) Responses to Freedom of Information Act requests.
Educational interventions did not appear to change the recorded incidence of dementia syndrome. There was no apparent effect of education, incentives or memory clinic activity on the reported incidence of dementia syndrome between 1997 and 2011 but there were signs of change in the documentation of consultations with people with dementia. There was no clear impact of incentivisation and memory clinic activity in prevalence data. Memory clinics are seeing more patients but fewer are being diagnosed with dementia.
It is not clear why there has been no upturn in documented incidence or prevalence of dementia syndrome despite substantial efforts and this requires further investigation to guide policy changes. The performance of memory clinics also needs further study.
在许多国家,尽早并及时识别痴呆综合征是一项政策要求。在英国,已通过教育干预、激励全科医生以及推广记忆诊所网络来实现更早、更及时的识别。
教育、激励措施以及记忆诊所活动的有效性尚不清楚。本文分析来自不同来源的数据,以评估这些干预措施对痴呆发病率和患病率的影响,以及记忆诊所的诊断性能。
使用了三个数据源:1)来自使用同一电子病历软件“健康信息网络”(THIN)的全科医疗网络的汇总、匿名数据;2)英国健康与社会关怀信息中心的数据报告;3)对信息自由法案请求的回复。
教育干预似乎并未改变记录的痴呆综合征发病率。1997年至2011年间,教育、激励措施或记忆诊所活动对报告的痴呆综合征发病率没有明显影响,但在与痴呆患者会诊的记录方面有变化迹象。激励措施和记忆诊所活动对患病率数据没有明显影响。记忆诊所接待的患者增多,但被诊断为痴呆的患者减少。
尽管付出了巨大努力,但痴呆综合征的记录发病率和患病率为何没有上升尚不清楚,这需要进一步调查以指导政策变化。记忆诊所的性能也需要进一步研究。