Clinical Neuropsychology section, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorstraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VUmc, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 May;27(5):581-593. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1072-1. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
To assess the long-term effects of neurofeedback (NFB) in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), we compared behavioral and neurocognitive outcomes at a 6-month naturalistic follow-up of a randomized controlled trial on NFB, methylphenidate (MPH), and physical activity (PA). Ninety-two children with a DSM-IV-TR ADHD diagnosis, aged 7-13, receiving NFB (n = 33), MPH (n = 28), or PA (n = 31), were re-assessed 6-months after the interventions. NFB comprised theta/beta training on the vertex (cortical zero). PA comprised moderate to vigorous intensity exercises. Outcome measures included parent and teacher behavioral reports, and neurocognitive measures (auditory oddball, stop-signal, and visual spatial working memory tasks). At follow-up, longitudinal hierarchical multilevel model analyses revealed no significant group differences for parent reports and neurocognitive measures (p = .058-.997), except for improved inhibition in MPH compared to NFB (p = .040) and faster response speed in NFB compared to PA (p = .012) during the stop-signal task. These effects, however, disappeared after controlling for medication use at follow-up. Interestingly, teacher reports showed less inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity at follow-up for NFB than PA (p = .004-.010), even after controlling for medication use (p = .013-.036). Our findings indicate that the superior results previously found for parent reports and neurocognitive outcome measures obtained with MPH compared to NFB and PA post intervention became smaller or non-significant at follow-up. Teacher reports suggested superior effects of NFB over PA; however, some children had different teachers at follow-up. Therefore, this finding should be interpreted with caution. Clinical trial registration Train your brain and exercise your heart? Advancing the treatment for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), Ref. no. NCT01363544, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01363544 .
为了评估神经反馈(NFB)对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童的长期影响,我们比较了一项随机对照试验的行为和神经认知结果,该试验在 6 个月的自然随访中对 NFB、哌甲酯(MPH)和体育活动(PA)进行了比较。92 名符合 DSM-IV-TR ADHD 诊断标准的 7-13 岁儿童,分别接受 NFB(n=33)、MPH(n=28)或 PA(n=31)治疗,在干预后 6 个月进行了重新评估。NFB 包括顶点(皮质零)的θ/β训练。PA 包括中等至剧烈强度的运动。结果测量包括家长和教师行为报告以及神经认知测量(听觉Oddball、停止信号和视觉空间工作记忆任务)。在随访时,纵向层次多水平模型分析显示,在家长报告和神经认知测量方面,各组之间没有显著差异(p=0.058-0.997),除了 MPH 组的抑制能力比 NFB 组改善(p=0.040)和 NFB 组的反应速度比 PA 组快(p=0.012)在停止信号任务中。然而,在随访时控制药物使用后,这些影响消失了。有趣的是,与 PA 相比,NFB 组的教师报告在随访时的注意力不集中和多动/冲动程度较低(p=0.004-0.010),即使在控制药物使用后(p=0.013-0.036)。我们的研究结果表明,与干预后 NFB 和 PA 相比,以前在家长报告和神经认知结果测量中发现的 MPH 的更好结果在随访时变得更小或不显著。教师报告表明 NFB 比 PA 有更好的效果;然而,一些儿童在随访时有不同的教师。因此,这一发现应该谨慎解释。临床试验注册 训练你的大脑,锻炼你的心脏?推进注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的治疗,参考号 NCT01363544,http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01363544。