• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒芬太尼对老年患者脑电双频指数的影响。

Effect of sufentanil on bispectral index in the elderly.

机构信息

Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2018 Feb;73(2):216-222. doi: 10.1111/anae.14102. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1111/anae.14102
PMID:29098683
Abstract

We examined the impact of adding sufentanil during anaesthesia induction with propofol on bispectral index values in elderly patients (≥ 65 years). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a target-controlled sufentanil infusion (effect-site concentration of 0.3 ng.ml ) or matching placebo, followed by a target-controlled propofol induction (initial effect-site concentration of 0.5 μg.ml ; step-wise increase of 0.5 μg.ml ) until loss of consciousness defined as an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation score < 2. Seventy-one patients (sufentanil 35, placebo 36) completed the study. Mean (SD) age was 72.3 (5.8) years; 41% were women. At loss of consciousness, mean (SD) bispectral index value was 75.0 (8.6) with sufentanil and 70.0 (8.0) with placebo; mean difference -5.0 (95% confidence interval -8.9 to -1.1), p = 0.013. Post-hoc analyses suggest that the difference was significant in men only (mean difference -7.3 (-11.8 to -2.6), p = 0.003). Sufentanil co-induction with propofol results in higher bispectral index values at loss of consciousness in elderly patients.

摘要

我们研究了在老年患者(≥65 岁)中,在异丙酚麻醉诱导时加入舒芬太尼对脑电双频指数值的影响。患者被随机分配接受靶控舒芬太尼输注(效应部位浓度为 0.3ng/ml)或匹配的安慰剂,然后接受靶控异丙酚诱导(初始效应部位浓度为 0.5μg/ml;逐步增加 0.5μg/ml),直到意识丧失定义为观察者警觉/镇静评分<2。71 名患者(舒芬太尼 35 名,安慰剂 36 名)完成了这项研究。平均(SD)年龄为 72.3(5.8)岁;41%为女性。在意识丧失时,舒芬太尼的脑电双频指数值为 75.0(8.6),安慰剂为 70.0(8.0);平均差值-5.0(95%置信区间-8.9 至-1.1),p=0.013。事后分析表明,这种差异仅在男性中具有统计学意义(平均差值-7.3(-11.8 至-2.6),p=0.003)。舒芬太尼与异丙酚联合诱导可使老年患者意识丧失时的脑电双频指数值更高。

相似文献

1
Effect of sufentanil on bispectral index in the elderly.舒芬太尼对老年患者脑电双频指数的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Feb;73(2):216-222. doi: 10.1111/anae.14102. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Effects of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil on loss of consciousness and bispectral index during propofol induction of anaesthesia.芬太尼、阿芬太尼、瑞芬太尼和舒芬太尼对丙泊酚诱导麻醉期间意识消失和脑电双频指数的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Apr;86(4):523-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/86.4.523.
3
Relationship between depth of anesthesia and effect-site concentration of propofol during induction with the target-controlled infusion technique in elderly patients.老年患者靶控输注技术诱导期间麻醉深度与丙泊酚效应室浓度的关系
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Apr 20;122(8):935-40.
4
Comparison of C₅₀ for Propofol-remifentanil Target-controlled Infusion and Bispectral Index at Loss of Consciousness and Response to Painful Stimulus in Elderly and Young Patients.老年和年轻患者意识消失及对疼痛刺激反应时丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注的半数有效浓度(C₅₀)与脑电双频指数的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Aug 5;128(15):1994-9. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.161338.
5
Effects of dexmedetomidine on performance of bispectral index as an indicator of loss of consciousness during propofol administration.右美托咪定对脑电双频指数在丙泊酚麻醉意识消失时监测作用的影响。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Mar 14;143:w13762. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13762. eCollection 2013.
6
Asleep-awake-asleep technique in children during strabismus surgery under sufentanil balanced anesthesia.舒芬太尼平衡麻醉下儿童斜视手术中的睡眠-清醒-睡眠技术
Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Dec;22(12):1216-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03901.x. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
7
[The application of conscious sedation with a small dose of dexmedetomidine and sufentanil in elderly patients undergoing multiple intestinal polyps resection].小剂量右美托咪定与舒芬太尼清醒镇静在老年患者多发肠息肉切除术中的应用
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Nov 22;96(43):3474-3478. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2016.43.007.
8
A comparison of two techniques for induction of anaesthesia with target-controlled infusion of propofol.两种依托咪酯靶控输注诱导麻醉技术的比较。
Anaesthesia. 2018 Dec;73(12):1507-1514. doi: 10.1111/anae.14355. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
The effect of remifentanil on propofol requirements to achieve loss of response to command vs. loss of response to pain.瑞芬太尼对丙泊酚需求量的影响,以达到对指令失去反应与对疼痛失去反应的效果。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Apr;72(4):479-487. doi: 10.1111/anae.13781. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
10
[Effect of ear point embedding on plasma and effect site concentrations of propofol-remifentanil in elderly patients after target-controlled induction].耳穴埋针对老年患者靶控诱导后丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼血浆及效应室浓度的影响
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2017 Aug 12;37(8):869-873. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.08.017.

引用本文的文献

1
Substance-dependent EEG during recovery from anesthesia and optimization of monitoring.麻醉恢复期物质依赖的脑电图监测及优化。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Jun;38(3):603-612. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01103-4. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
2
Effects of different depth of anesthesia on perioperative inflammatory reaction and hospital outcomes in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy.不同麻醉深度对老年腹腔镜根治性胃切除术患者围手术期炎症反应及住院结局的影响。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01854-8.
3
Application of propofol combined with sevoflurane anesthesia in staged hepatectomy liver detachment and portal vein ligation.
丙泊酚联合七氟醚麻醉在分期肝切除术肝离断及门静脉结扎中的应用
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Sep;22(3):921. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10353. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Combination of propofol and nasal sufentanil or intravenous midazolam for colonoscopy: a comparative study.丙泊酚联合鼻内舒芬太尼或静脉注射咪达唑仑用于结肠镜检查:一项比较研究。
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(2):146-152. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.106298.
5
The effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine on the requirements for propofol for loss of consciousness in patients monitored via the bispectral index: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.不同剂量右美托咪定对脑电双频指数监测下患者意识消失所需丙泊酚用量的影响:一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01013-x.