Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚联合鼻内舒芬太尼或静脉注射咪达唑仑用于结肠镜检查:一项比较研究。

Combination of propofol and nasal sufentanil or intravenous midazolam for colonoscopy: a comparative study.

作者信息

Akarsu Ayazoglu Tulin, Uzman Sinan

机构信息

Alaattin Keykubat University, Turkey.

Health Sciences University, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Turkey.

出版信息

Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2021;53(2):146-152. doi: 10.5114/ait.2021.106298.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to compare and evaluate the side effects (SEs) and sedation characteristics of synergistic sedation with doses of 0.25 μg kg-1 or 0.5 μg kg-1 intranasal (IN) sufentanil, and intravenous (IV) midazolam during propofol-based sedation in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The patients were randomly allocated into one of 3 groups: group I (n = 33) - sufentanil IN 0.5 μg kg-1; group II (n = 33) - sufentanil IN 0.25 μg kg-1; and group III (n = 33) - IN 0.9% NaCl ( placebo ) and IV 0.04 mg kg-1 midazolam. After 15 minutes, all patients received 0.5 mg kg-1 propofol intravenously. Cardiorespiratory side effects and sedation characteristics were compared.

RESULTS

The propofol consumption in group III was significantly higher than in group I and II (P < 0.001). Spontaneous eye opening time was significantly longer in group III than in group I and II ( < 0.001). The patients in group III had significantly longer recovery times than patients in group I and II (P < 0.0001). Hypotension and bradycardia were not encountered during the study. The incidence of hypoxaemia was significantly greater in group III compared to other groups (P < 0.001). Pain control and endoscopist satisfaction was significantly better for group I and II than for group III (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Synergistic sedation can be achieved safely and effectively by the combination of propofol and IN sufentanil or IV midazolam for colonoscopy. However, IN sufentanil can be considered as a reasonable alternative to IV midazolam due to less respiratory depression, and better pain control and endoscopist satisfaction.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在比较和评估在接受结肠镜检查的患者中,0.25μg/kg或0.5μg/kg剂量的鼻内(IN)舒芬太尼与静脉注射(IV)咪达唑仑协同镇静的副作用(SEs)和镇静特征,该协同镇静基于丙泊酚进行。

材料与方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。患者被随机分配到3组中的一组:第一组(n = 33)——鼻内给予0.5μg/kg舒芬太尼;第二组(n = 33)——鼻内给予0.25μg/kg舒芬太尼;第三组(n = 33)——鼻内给予0.9%氯化钠(安慰剂)并静脉注射0.04mg/kg咪达唑仑。15分钟后,所有患者静脉注射0.5mg/kg丙泊酚。比较了心肺副作用和镇静特征。

结果

第三组丙泊酚消耗量显著高于第一组和第二组(P < 0.001)。第三组自主睁眼时间显著长于第一组和第二组(P < 0.001)。第三组患者的恢复时间显著长于第一组和第二组患者(P < 0.0001)。研究期间未出现低血压和心动过缓。与其他组相比,第三组低氧血症发生率显著更高(P < 0.001)。第一组和第二组的疼痛控制和内镜医师满意度显著优于第三组(P < 0.001)。

结论

丙泊酚与鼻内舒芬太尼或静脉注射咪达唑仑联合用于结肠镜检查可安全有效地实现协同镇静。然而,由于呼吸抑制较轻,且疼痛控制和内镜医师满意度更好,鼻内舒芬太尼可被视为静脉注射咪达唑仑的合理替代方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4515/10158433/8c9e90af489b/AIT-53-44134-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验