• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助治疗在视网膜静脉阻塞黄斑水肿抗 VEGF 治疗方案中的疗效和时机:12 个月的真实世界结果。

Efficacy and timing of adjunctive therapy in the anti-VEGF treatment regimen for macular oedema in retinal vein occlusion: 12-month real-world result.

机构信息

Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2018 Mar;32(3):537-545. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.230. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1038/eye.2017.230
PMID:29099501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5848273/
Abstract

PurposeVarious combination treatment regimens have been tried to improve the short-term efficacy of intravitreal monotherapy for the treatment of macular oedema (MO) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Our study introduces the RandOL protocol (Ranibizumab and Ozurdex with Laser photocoagulation) of initial anti-VEGF therapy, controlling recurrent non-ischaemic MO with an intravitreal steroid and applying laser therapy to non-perfused retina. We describe our 12-month follow-up experience on timing for adjunctive therapy and real-world effectiveness and safety data.MethodsA retrospective analysis was carried out on 66 consecutive treatment-naive RVO patients with MO who received our RandOL treatment regimen. Baseline visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were compared with 12-month result.ResultsAt 12 months, 77% had significant VA improvement, 52% had ≥3-line improvement, and 15% were worse. Significant improvements in CRT were observed in 97% (baseline median CRT=531 μm (IQR 435-622) reduced to 245 μm (IQR 221-351, P<0.001) at 12 months); 76% achieved a dry fovea at 1 year. Mean number of total injections required was 5.5 (range 2-11) and 6% required ≥9 injections in 1 year. Although 70% received additional Ozurdex, 82% received ≥1 sessions of laser therapy. The BRVO subgroup achieved better VA and CRT improvement at 1 year, but small numbers limit definitive statistical conclusions.ConclusionsOur real-world results using a combination treatment protocol for RVO-related MO achieved similar desirable anatomical and visual outcomes as with a single-agent therapy with less intravitreal re-treatment rates at first year. Randomised controlled studies are needed to evaluate the role of laser and the ideal timing of combination therapy.

摘要

目的

为了提高视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)继发黄斑水肿(MO)患者玻璃体腔内单一药物治疗的短期疗效,尝试了多种联合治疗方案。本研究采用抗 VEGF 药物联合激光光凝(Ranibizumab 和 Ozurdex)作为初始治疗方案(RandOL 方案),通过玻璃体腔内注射激素控制复发性非缺血性 MO,并对无灌注视网膜进行激光治疗。我们描述了我们在辅助治疗时机以及真实世界疗效和安全性数据方面的 12 个月随访经验。

方法

对 66 例接受 RandOL 治疗方案的初治 RVO 合并 MO 患者进行回顾性分析。比较基线视力(VA)和中心视网膜厚度(CRT)与 12 个月的结果。

结果

12 个月时,77%的患者 VA 显著改善,52%的患者 VA 提高≥3 行,15%的患者 VA 下降。97%(基线 CRT 中位数为 531μm(IQR 435-622))的患者 CRT 显著降低至 245μm(IQR 221-351,P<0.001);76%的患者在 1 年内达到黄斑区干性。平均总注射次数为 5.5(范围 2-11),6%的患者在 1 年内需要≥9 次注射。尽管 70%的患者接受了额外的 Ozurdex 治疗,但 82%的患者接受了≥1 次激光治疗。BRVO 亚组在 1 年内获得了更好的 VA 和 CRT 改善,但由于样本量较小,无法得出明确的统计学结论。

结论

我们使用联合治疗方案治疗 RVO 相关性 MO 的真实世界结果与单一药物治疗相似,在第一年的再治疗率较低。需要进行随机对照研究来评估激光的作用和联合治疗的理想时机。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/5848273/b44f1fc838c3/eye2017230f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/5848273/8d26d213d575/eye2017230f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/5848273/b44f1fc838c3/eye2017230f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/5848273/8d26d213d575/eye2017230f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25e1/5848273/b44f1fc838c3/eye2017230f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and timing of adjunctive therapy in the anti-VEGF treatment regimen for macular oedema in retinal vein occlusion: 12-month real-world result.辅助治疗在视网膜静脉阻塞黄斑水肿抗 VEGF 治疗方案中的疗效和时机:12 个月的真实世界结果。
Eye (Lond). 2018 Mar;32(3):537-545. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.230. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发的黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD009510. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009510.pub2.
3
Safety and long-term efficacy of repeated dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion with or without a switch to anti-VEGF agents: a 3-year experience.重复玻璃体内注射地塞米松治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发的黄斑囊样水肿(无论是否转换为抗血管内皮生长因子药物)的安全性和长期疗效:一项为期3年的经验
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1441-1448. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4016-7. Epub 2018 May 31.
4
Low frequency ranibizumab versus dexamethasone implant for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.低频雷珠单抗与地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的比较
Clin Exp Optom. 2018 Jan;101(1):116-122. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12586. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion resistant to anti-VEGF therapy: a 12-month prospective study.玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物治疗抗VEGF治疗耐药的视网膜静脉阻塞患者的疗效和安全性:一项为期12个月的前瞻性研究。
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2019 Dec;38(4):330-337. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2019.1614020. Epub 2019 May 27.
6
Real-life clinical data for dexamethasone and ranibizumab in the treatment of branch or central retinal vein occlusion over a period of six months.地塞米松和雷珠单抗治疗视网膜分支或中央静脉阻塞六个月的真实临床数据。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;256(2):267-279. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3852-1. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Treatment patterns of ranibizumab intravitreal injection and dexamethasone intravitreal implant for retinal vein occlusion in the USA.美国雷珠单抗玻璃体内注射和地塞米松玻璃体内植入治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的治疗模式
Eye (Lond). 2017 Apr;31(4):551-559. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.269. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
8
Sequential therapy with ranibizumab and dexamethasone intravitreal implant is better than dexamethasone monotherapy for macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion.对于视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿,雷珠单抗与地塞米松玻璃体内植入物序贯治疗优于地塞米松单药治疗。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):210-4. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305661. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
9
Sustained Benefits of Ranibizumab with or without Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Month Results of the BRIGHTER Study.雷珠单抗联合或不联合激光治疗分支静脉阻塞的持续获益:BRIGHTER 研究 24 个月结果。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1778-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
10
Anti-VEGF treatment in branch retinal vein occlusion: a real-world experience over 4 years.视网膜分支静脉阻塞的抗血管内皮生长因子治疗:4年真实世界经验
Acta Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;93(8):719-25. doi: 10.1111/aos.12772. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
From Monotherapy to Combination Strategies: Redefining Treatment Approaches for Multiple-Cause Macular Edema.从单一疗法到联合策略:重新定义多病因黄斑水肿的治疗方法
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 12;19:887-897. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S513141. eCollection 2025.
2
Long term efficacy and safety profile of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in retinal vein occlusions: a systematic review.地塞米松玻璃体内植入物治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的长期疗效和安全性:一项系统评价
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 29;11:1454591. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1454591. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparing ranibizumab, dexamethasone implant, and combined therapy for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion: a clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term results of combination therapy using anti-VEGF agents and dexamethasone intravitreal implant for retinal vein occlusion: an investigational case series.抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)药物与地塞米松玻璃体内植入联合治疗视网膜静脉阻塞的长期结果:一项病例系列研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec 19;11:31-38. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S119373. eCollection 2017.
2
Individualized Stabilization Criteria-Driven Ranibizumab versus Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Six-Month Results of BRIGHTER.基于个体化稳定标准的雷珠单抗与激光治疗分支静脉阻塞:BRIGHTER 研究 6 个月结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1332-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
3
比较雷珠单抗、地塞米松植入物和联合治疗对视网膜分支静脉阻塞引起的黄斑水肿:一项临床试验。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun 24;44(1):262. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03158-x.
4
The Impact of Intraocular Treatment on Visual Acuity of Patients Diagnosed with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusions.眼内治疗对诊断为视网膜分支静脉阻塞患者视力的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 12;11(10):1414. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101414.
5
Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in the Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Era.抗血管内皮生长因子时代视网膜中央静脉阻塞的治疗模式与临床结局
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2019 Oct 14;4(1):13-21. doi: 10.1177/2474126419878922. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
6
Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: An 8-Year Experience at a Tertiary Eye Center.视网膜分支静脉阻塞的治疗模式与临床结果:一家三级眼科中心的8年经验
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2021 Jan 28;5(5):412-419. doi: 10.1177/2474126420978874. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
7
Comparison of Ranibizumab Treatment Response of Superior and Inferior Temporal Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Year Follow-Up.雷珠单抗治疗颞上和颞下分支视网膜静脉阻塞的疗效比较:一年随访
Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 Aug 5;7(3):207-212. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.46794. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy vs. ranibizumab combined with dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗单药治疗与雷珠单抗联合地塞米松植入物治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的比较。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 12;9:930508. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.930508. eCollection 2022.
9
Outcomes of Combination Therapy using Aflibercept and Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant versus Dexamethasone Monotherapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion.阿柏西普联合地塞米松眼内植入物与地塞米松单药治疗视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的疗效比较。
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr 30;28(1):18-22. doi: 10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_297_19. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
10
Combination Therapy for Macular Oedema in Retinal Vein Occlusions: 3-Year Results from a Real-World Clinical Practice.视网膜静脉阻塞性黄斑水肿的联合治疗:来自真实世界临床实践的3年结果
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar 27;14:955-965. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S241044. eCollection 2020.
Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 52-Week Results of the VIBRANT Study.
玻璃体内阿柏西普治疗分支型视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿:VIBRANT 研究的 52 周结果。
Ophthalmology. 2016 Feb;123(2):330-336. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Oct 30.
4
One-year outcome of bevacizumab therapy for chronic macular edema in central and branch retinal vein occlusions in real-world clinical practice in the UK.英国真实临床实践中贝伐单抗治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞和视网膜分支静脉阻塞所致慢性黄斑水肿的一年疗效
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 25;9:1779-84. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S89147. eCollection 2015.
5
Two or more dexamethasone intravitreal implants in treatment-naïve patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion: subgroup analysis of a retrospective chart review study.在未经治疗的视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿患者中使用两个或更多地塞米松玻璃体内植入物:一项回顾性病历审查研究的亚组分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep 4;15:118. doi: 10.1186/s12886-015-0106-z.
6
Scatter Photocoagulation Does Not Reduce Macular Edema or Treatment Burden in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion: The RELATE Trial.散射光凝术不能减轻视网膜静脉阻塞患者的黄斑水肿或治疗负担:RELATE试验
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jul;122(7):1426-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 May 9.
7
Targeted photocoagulation of peripheral ischemia to treat rebound edema.针对周围缺血进行靶向光凝治疗反弹性水肿。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 13;9:337-41. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S75842. eCollection 2015.
8
A 6-month, subject-masked, randomized controlled study to assess efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjunct to bevacizumab compared with bevacizumab alone in the treatment of patients with macular edema due to central or branch retinal vein occlusion.一项为期6个月、受试者盲法、随机对照研究,旨在评估地塞米松作为贝伐单抗辅助药物与单用贝伐单抗相比,在治疗中心性或分支视网膜静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿患者中的疗效。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun 3;8:1057-64. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S60159. eCollection 2014.
9
Intravitreal aflibercept injection for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: two-year results from the COPERNICUS study.玻璃体内注射阿柏西普治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞所致黄斑水肿:COPERNICUS 研究两年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2014 Jul;121(7):1414-1420.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Prospective study of peripheral panretinal photocoagulation of areas of nonperfusion in central retinal vein occlusion.中心性视网膜静脉阻塞中无灌注区周边全视网膜光凝的前瞻性研究。
Retina. 2013 Jan;33(1):56-62. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182641875.