• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡药剂师管理的危险因素管理诊所的长期临床和成本结果:一项观察性研究。

Long-term Clinical and Cost Outcomes of a Pharmacist-managed Risk Factor Management Clinic in Singapore: An Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Pharmacy, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2017 Dec;39(12):2355-2365. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.009
PMID:29100730
Abstract

PURPOSE

Few studies have determined the benefits of pharmacist-run clinics within a tertiary institution, and specifically on their capability to improve clinical outcomes as well as reduce the cost of illness. This study was designed to investigate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-managed risk factor management clinic (RFMP) in an acute care setting through the comparison of clinical (improvement in glycosylated hemoglobin level) and cost outcomes with patients receiving usual care.

METHODS

This single-center, observational study included patients aged ≥21 years old and diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) who received care within the cardiology department of a tertiary institution between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. The intervention group comprised patients who attended the RFMP for 3 to 6 months, and the usual-care group comprised patients who received standard cardiologist care. Univariate analysis and multiple linear regression were conducted to analyze the clinical and cost outcomes.

FINDINGS

A total of 142 patients with DM (71 patients in the intervention group and 71 patients in the usual-care group) with similar baseline characteristics were included. After adjusting for differences in baseline systolic blood pressure and triglyceride levels, the mean reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin level at 6 months from baseline in the intervention group was significantly lower by 0.78% compared with the usual-care group. Patients in the usual-care group had a significantly higher risk of hospital admissions within the 12 months from baseline compared with the intervention group (odds ratio, 3.84 [95% CI, 1.17-12.57]; P = 0.026). Significantly lower mean annual direct medical costs were also observed in the intervention group (US $8667.03 [$17,416.20] vs US $56,665.02 [$127,250.10]; P = 0.001).

IMPLICATIONS

The pharmacist-managed RFMP exhibited improved clinical outcomes and reduced health care costs compared with usual care within a tertiary institute.

摘要

目的

很少有研究确定了在三级医疗机构中由药剂师管理的诊所的益处,特别是在改善临床结果和降低疾病成本方面的能力。本研究旨在通过比较接受常规护理的患者的临床(糖化血红蛋白水平的改善)和成本结果,来调查在急性护理环境中由药剂师管理的风险因素管理诊所(RFMP)的效果。

方法

这是一项单中心观察性研究,纳入了 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间在三级机构心内科接受治疗的年龄≥21 岁且被诊断患有 2 型糖尿病(DM)的患者。干预组由参加 RFMP 治疗 3 至 6 个月的患者组成,常规护理组由接受标准心脏病专家护理的患者组成。进行单变量分析和多元线性回归分析以分析临床和成本结果。

结果

共纳入了 142 名患有 DM(干预组 71 名患者,常规护理组 71 名患者)且基线特征相似的患者。在校正基线收缩压和甘油三酯水平的差异后,干预组在 6 个月时糖化血红蛋白水平较基线的平均降低幅度显著低 0.78%,而常规护理组则显著高于干预组。与干预组相比,常规护理组在从基线开始的 12 个月内住院的风险显著更高(优势比,3.84[95%CI,1.17-12.57];P=0.026)。干预组的年度直接医疗费用也显著降低(US$8667.03[17416.20] vs US$56665.02[127250.10];P=0.001)。

结论

与三级机构的常规护理相比,药剂师管理的 RFMP 表现出改善的临床结果和降低的医疗保健成本。

相似文献

1
Long-term Clinical and Cost Outcomes of a Pharmacist-managed Risk Factor Management Clinic in Singapore: An Observational Study.新加坡药剂师管理的危险因素管理诊所的长期临床和成本结果:一项观察性研究。
Clin Ther. 2017 Dec;39(12):2355-2365. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.10.009. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
2
Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary collaborative care versus usual care in the management of high-risk patients with diabetes in Singapore: Short-term results from a randomized controlled trial.新加坡多学科协作护理与常规护理在高危糖尿病患者管理中的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的短期结果
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Dec;43(6):775-783. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12700. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
Clinical effectiveness and cost savings in diabetes care, supported by pharmacist counselling.在药剂师咨询的支持下,糖尿病护理的临床效果及成本节约。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Jan-Feb;57(1):102-108.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.08.010. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Effect of a pharmacist-managed hypertension program on health system costs: an evaluation of the Study of Cardiovascular Risk Intervention by Pharmacists-Hypertension (SCRIP-HTN).药剂师管理的高血压项目对卫生系统成本的影响:对心血管风险干预的药剂师研究-高血压(SCRIP-HTN)的评估。
Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jun;32(6):527-37. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2012.01097.x. Epub 2012 May 2.
5
Clinical pharmacist intervention and the proportion of diabetes patients attaining prevention objectives in a multispecialty medical group.临床药师干预与多专科医疗组中达到预防目标的糖尿病患者比例
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(6):456-62. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.6.456.
6
Assessing the Effect of Pharmacist Care on Diabetes-Related Outcomes in a Rural Outpatient Clinic: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.评估药剂师护理对农村门诊糖尿病相关结局的影响:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Ann Pharmacother. 2017 Jun;51(6):473-478. doi: 10.1177/1060028016685731. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
7
Health care expenditures and therapeutic outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service versus usual medical care.药师管理抗凝治疗服务与常规医疗保健的医疗支出和治疗效果。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jul;31(7):686-94. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.7.686.
8
Impact of pharmacist-managed erythropoiesis-stimulating agents clinics for patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD.非透析依赖型 CKD 患者的药师管理促红细胞生成素刺激剂治疗门诊的影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Sep;60(3):371-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.04.013. Epub 2012 May 26.
9
Comparing Clinical Outcomes of a Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Clinic to Usual Physician-Based Care.比较药剂师管理的糖尿病诊所与常规医生护理的临床结果。
J Pharm Pract. 2018 Jun;31(3):268-271. doi: 10.1177/0897190017710522. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Comparison of two different models of anticoagulation management services with usual medical care.两种不同抗凝管理服务模式与常规医疗护理的比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Apr;30(4):330-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.4.330.