Speizer C, Rennie C J, Breton H
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90509.
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jan;18(1):26-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80306-3.
In-flight medical emergencies were evaluated among passengers arriving at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) from October 1985 through March 1986. All emergency department, LAX first-aid station, and paramedic records were examined. There were 8,735,000 passenger arrivals at LAX during the study period; 260 passengers (0.003%) developed medical complaints in flight, and of these 260, 115 (44.2%) had symptoms that lasted for more than one hour. Only 20 (8%) had in-flight physician assistance. One hundred thirty-seven (52.6%) passengers required only first-aid station treatment or signed out against medical advice, 123 (47.3%) were triaged to the ED, and 25 (9.6%) were admitted to the hospital. Seven passengers had fatal events while in flight. Most of the illnesses encountered did not require advanced medical treatment. We conclude that while in-flight medical illnesses occur more frequently than believed by airlines, true emergencies are rare. The rarity of true in-flight medical emergencies coupled with low physician availability bring into question the benefit of any comprehensive medical kit on airliners.
对1985年10月至1986年3月期间抵达洛杉矶国际机场(LAX)的乘客的飞行中医疗紧急情况进行了评估。检查了所有急诊科、LAX急救站和护理人员的记录。在研究期间,有873.5万名乘客抵达LAX;260名乘客(0.003%)在飞行中出现医疗问题,在这260名乘客中,115名(44.2%)的症状持续了一个多小时。只有20名(8%)乘客在飞行中有医生协助。137名(52.6%)乘客仅需急救站治疗或拒绝医嘱自行离开,123名(47.3%)被分诊到急诊科,25名(9.6%)被收治入院。7名乘客在飞行中发生致命事件。遇到的大多数疾病不需要高级医疗治疗。我们得出结论,虽然飞行中医疗疾病的发生频率比航空公司认为的要高,但真正的紧急情况很少见。真正的飞行中医疗紧急情况的罕见性以及医生可用性低,让人质疑客机上配备任何综合医疗包的益处。