• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Psychological consequences of blunt head trauma and relation to other indices of severity of injury.

作者信息

Gensemer I B, Smith J L, Walker J C, McMurry F, Indeck M, Brotman S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania 17822.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jan;18(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80303-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80303-8
PMID:2910167
Abstract

To investigate the relationship between APACHE II, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), and behavioral outcome, a group of 39 patients who had been admitted on an emergency basis with a traumatic head injury were selected from the Neuropsychology Registry for study. Except for subtle personality and cognitive changes, all of the patients were making good neurological recoveries. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery, which has been shown to be accurate in identifying brain-damaged patients, was used as the measure of outcome. The age of the patients ranged from 16 to 49 years (mean, 25.6; SD, 9.3). The patients' educational levels ranged from elementary school to college (mean, 11.6 years of education; SD, 1.5). Halstead Impairment Indexes (HII) ranged from 0.0 to 1.0 (mean, 0.6; SD, 0.26). APACHE II scores were calculated using the worst values, obtained during the first 24 hours. These scores ranged from 5 to 35 (mean, 16; SD, 7). APACHE II was found to not significantly correlate with HII (r = 0.21, P greater than .05). ISS was calculated for each patient and ranged from 5 to 70 (mean, 27; SD, 13). ISS was found to significantly correlate with HII (r = 0.38, P less than .01). GCS ranged from 3 to 15 (mean, 9.3; SD, 3.4). Of all the correlations, GCS was the most strongly correlated with outcome as measured by the HII (r = -0.44, P less than .01). Our data emphasize that head-injured patients have subtle cognitive dysfunction even when apparently recovering well and demonstrate the need for formal psychological evaluation in all patients with injury significant enough to warrant hospitalization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Psychological consequences of blunt head trauma and relation to other indices of severity of injury.
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jan;18(1):9-12. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80303-8.
2
Behavioral consequences of trauma.创伤的行为后果。
J Trauma. 1988 Jan;28(1):44-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198801000-00006.
3
Personality and behavioural change after severe blunt head injury--a relative's view.重度钝性颅脑损伤后的人格与行为变化——亲属视角
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Apr;46(4):336-44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.4.336.
4
Requirement for hourly Glasgow Coma Scores in the emergency department: process or outcome based?急诊科每小时格拉斯哥昏迷评分的要求:基于过程还是结果?
Conn Med. 2003 Feb;67(2):75-7.
5
Effects of intoxication on the catecholamine response to multisystem injury.
J Trauma. 1991 Sep;31(9):1271-5; discussion 1275-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199109000-00012.
6
IQ levels following trauma.创伤后的智商水平。
J Trauma. 1989 Dec;29(12):1616-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198912000-00003.
7
Psychological disturbance, incomplete effort, and compensation-seeking status as predictors of neuropsychological test performance in head injury.心理障碍、努力程度不完整以及寻求补偿状态作为颅脑损伤神经心理测试表现的预测因素。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006 Jan;28(1):111-25. doi: 10.1080/13803390590929270.
8
The revised Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System (APACHE II) is more effective than the Glasgow Coma Scale for prediction of mortality in head-injured patients with systemic trauma.修订后的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估系统(APACHE II)在预测伴有全身创伤的颅脑损伤患者死亡率方面比格拉斯哥昏迷量表更有效。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):453-8.
9
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
10
A Comparison Between the Effectiveness of Full Outline of Unresponsiveness and Glasgow Coma Score at Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit Patients.神经外科重症监护病房患者中无反应性全面概述与格拉斯哥昏迷评分有效性的比较
Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(2):248-250. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.19504-16.0.