Suppr超能文献

全身振动期间不同的抗疲劳腿部肌肉和肌电图反应。

Different fatigue-resistant leg muscles and EMG response during whole-body vibration.

作者信息

Simsek Deniz

机构信息

Faculty of Sport Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sport Teaching, Anadolu University, Eskisehir 26470, Turkey.

出版信息

J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017 Dec;37:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.10.006. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of static whole-body vibration (WBV) on the Electromyograhic (EMG) responses of leg muscles, which are fatigue-resistant in different manner. The study population was divided into two groups according to the values obtained by the Fatigue Index [Group I: Less Fatigue Resistant (LFR), n=11; Group II: More Fatigue Resistant (MFR), n=11]. The repeated electromyographic (EMG) activities of four leg muscles were analyzed the following determinants: (1) frequency (30 Hz, 35 Hz and 40 Hz); (2) stance position (static squat position); (3) amplitude (2 mm and 4 mm) and (4) knee flexion angle (120°), (5) vertical vibration platform. Vibration data were analyzed using Minitab 16 (Minitab Ltd, State College, PA, USA). The significance level was set at p<.05. The study results showed that static WBV stimuli given at different frequencies and amplitudes resulted in a significant increase (p<.05) in compared, the LFR group showed significantly (1) higher rates of quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscle fatigue (p<.05), (2) higher levels of knee extensor and flexor torque (p<.05) and (3) higher percentage increases in EMG activation at higher frequencies (max at 40 Hz) and amplitudes (4 mm) (p<.05). The present study can be used for the optimal prescription of vibration exercise and can serve to guide the development of training programs.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定静态全身振动(WBV)对以不同方式抗疲劳的腿部肌肉肌电图(EMG)反应的影响。根据疲劳指数获得的值,将研究人群分为两组[第一组:抗疲劳能力较弱(LFR),n = 11;第二组:抗疲劳能力较强(MFR),n = 11]。分析了四块腿部肌肉重复的肌电图(EMG)活动的以下决定因素:(1)频率(30Hz、35Hz和40Hz);(2)站立姿势(静态深蹲姿势);(3)振幅(2mm和4mm);(4)膝关节屈曲角度(120°);(5)垂直振动平台。使用Minitab 16(美国宾夕法尼亚州立大学Minitab有限公司)分析振动数据。显著性水平设定为p <.05。研究结果表明,不同频率和振幅的静态WBV刺激导致显著增加(p <.05),相比之下,LFR组显著表现为:(1)股四头肌和腘绳肌疲劳率更高(p <.05);(2)膝关节伸肌和屈肌扭矩水平更高(p <.05);(3)在较高频率(40Hz时最高)和振幅(4mm)下,EMG激活的百分比增加更高(p <.05)。本研究可用于振动运动的最佳处方,并有助于指导训练计划的制定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验