Department of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1003-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
Choosing the most fit-for-purpose outcome measurement instruments is fundamental because using inappropriate instruments can lead to detection bias and measurement inconsistency. Recent recommendations, consensus procedures and systematic reviews on existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) informed this manuscript, which provides suggestions on which outcome domains and measurement instruments to use in patients with low back pain (LBP). Six domains are identified as highly relevant: (1) physical functioning, (2) pain intensity, (3) health-related quality of life, (4) work, (5) psychological functioning and (6) pain interference. For each domain, one or more PROMs are suggested for clinical research and practice, selecting among those that are most frequently used and recommended, and that have satisfactory measurement properties in patients with LBP. Further research on the measurement properties of these suggested PROMs is needed while also considering other emerging instruments, such as the PROMIS computerised adaptive testing and short forms.
选择最合适的结局测量工具至关重要,因为使用不恰当的工具可能会导致检测偏差和测量不一致。本研究依据现有的患者报告结局测量工具(PROMs)的最新建议、共识程序和系统评价,针对腰痛患者,就应使用哪些结局测量领域和测量工具提供了建议。确定了六个高度相关的领域:(1)躯体功能,(2)疼痛强度,(3)健康相关生活质量,(4)工作,(5)心理功能,(6)疼痛干扰。对于每个领域,建议在临床研究和实践中使用一种或多种 PROMs,从最常用和推荐的 PROMs 中进行选择,并且在腰痛患者中具有满意的测量特性。在研究这些建议的 PROMs 的测量特性的同时,还需要考虑其他新兴的工具,如 PROMIS 计算机化自适应测试和短式量表。