Suppr超能文献

探讨依从家庭锻炼建议与非特异性下腰痛康复之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。

Exploring the association between adherence to home-based exercise recommendations and recovery of nonspecific low back pain: a prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Center for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Julius Health Care Centers, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Physical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy Science and Sport, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 1;25(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07705-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to home-based exercise (HBE) recommendations is critical in physiotherapy for patients with low back pain (LBP). However, limited research has explored its connection with clinical outcomes. This study examined how adherence to HBE relates to changes in physical function, pain intensity, and recovery from LBP in patients undergoing physiotherapy treatment.

METHODS

Data from a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands involving patients with LBP from 58 primary care physiotherapy practices were used. Adherence to HBE was assessed with the Exercise Adherence Scale (EXAS) at each treatment session. Previously identified adherence trajectories served as a longitudinal measure of adherence and included the classes "declining adherence" (12% of participants), "stable adherence" (45%), and "increasing adherence" (43%). The main outcomes included disability (Oswestry Disability Index), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale), and recovery (pain-free for > 4 weeks), which were measured at baseline and after three months. Linear and binomial logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders were used to examine adherence-outcome relationships.

RESULTS

In the parent trial, 208 participants were included. EXAS scores were available for 173 participants, collected over a median of 4.0 treatment sessions (IQR 3.0 to 6.0). Forty-five (28.5%) patients considered themselves to have recovered after three months. The median changes in the Oswestry Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale were - 8 (IQR - 1 to -20) and - 2 (IQR - 0.5 to -4), respectively. The mean EXAS scores varied among patient classes: "declining adherence" (46.0, SD 19.4), "stable adherence" (81.0, SD 12.4), and "increasing adherence" (39.9, SD 25.3), with an overall mean of 59.2 (SD 25.3). No associations between adherence and changes in physical functioning or pain were found in the regression analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

No association between adherence to HBE recommendations and changes in clinical outcomes in patients with LBP was found. These findings suggest that the relationship between adherence to HBE recommendations and treatment outcomes may be more complex than initially assumed. Further research using detailed longitudinal data combined with qualitative methods to investigate patient motivation and beliefs may lead to a deeper understanding of the relationship between adherence and clinical outcomes in patients with LBP.

摘要

背景

在物理治疗中,坚持家庭锻炼(HBE)对腰痛(LBP)患者至关重要。然而,很少有研究探讨其与临床结果的关系。本研究旨在探讨物理治疗中,坚持 HBE 与患者身体功能变化、疼痛强度和 LBP 恢复之间的关系。

方法

研究数据来自荷兰的一项多中心聚类随机对照试验,共纳入了 58 个初级保健物理治疗诊所的 LBP 患者。在每次治疗时,使用锻炼依从量表(EXAS)评估 HBE 的依从性。先前确定的依从轨迹作为依从性的纵向测量,包括“依从性下降”(45%)、“稳定依从性”(12%)和“依从性增加”(43%)三个类别。主要结局包括残疾(Oswestry 残疾指数)、疼痛(数字疼痛评分量表)和恢复(4 周以上无痛),分别在基线和 3 个月时进行测量。使用线性和二项逻辑回归分析调整混杂因素,以检验依从性与结局之间的关系。

结果

在主要试验中,共纳入了 208 名参与者。EXAS 评分可用于 173 名参与者,在中位数为 4.0 次治疗(IQR 3.0 至 6.0)时收集。45 名(28.5%)患者在 3 个月后认为自己已经康复。Oswestry 残疾指数和数字疼痛评分量表的中位数变化分别为-8(IQR -1 至-20)和-2(IQR 0.5 至-4)。患者分类的平均 EXAS 得分不同:“依从性下降”(46.0,SD 19.4)、“稳定依从性”(81.0,SD 12.4)和“依从性增加”(39.9,SD 25.3),总体平均值为 59.2(SD 25.3)。回归分析未发现依从与身体功能或疼痛变化之间的关联。

结论

在腰痛患者中,坚持 HBE 建议与临床结局变化之间没有关联。这些发现表明,坚持 HBE 建议与治疗结果之间的关系可能比最初假设的更为复杂。进一步使用详细的纵向数据结合定性方法研究患者的动机和信念,可能会更深入地了解腰痛患者中依从与临床结局之间的关系。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验