Research Institute for Primary Care & Health Sciences, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
Self-management interventions for persistent low back pain (LBP) promote active involvement of the patient in managing their condition. Such interventions can be characterised as behaviour change interventions, in that they are designed to help the patient learn and adopt a set of health behaviours that they can use in everyday life to benefit their condition by reducing or managing their symptoms. Self-management interventions are recommended in several key guidelines for the treatment of persistent LBP, but the evidence for the effectiveness of these types of interventions is inconclusive. In this article, we discuss the existing literature within self-management interventions for persistent LBP and make suggestions for how research in this area can be improved, specifically addressing areas where evidence is currently lacking. Existing definitions of self-management are examined, and the importance of the choice of an underlying theory and appropriate outcome measures are discussed.
自我管理干预措施可促进持续性腰痛(LBP)患者积极参与管理自身病情。此类干预措施可被定性为行为改变干预措施,因为它们旨在帮助患者学习并采用一套健康行为,以便通过减少或控制症状,在日常生活中使病情受益。在持续性 LBP 治疗的几项关键指南中均推荐使用自我管理干预措施,但这些干预措施有效性的证据尚不确定。在本文中,我们讨论了持续性 LBP 自我管理干预措施方面的现有文献,并就如何改进该领域的研究提出了建议,特别针对目前缺乏证据的领域。我们还检查了现有的自我管理定义,并讨论了选择基础理论和适当的结果测量的重要性。