Liang Chao, Qiao Jun-Qin, Lian Hong-Zhen
State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Life Sciences, School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Center of Materials Analysis, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing 210023, China.
State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Life Sciences, School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering and Center of Materials Analysis, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Nanjing 210023, China.
J Chromatogr A. 2017 Dec 15;1528:25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.10.064. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) based octanol-water partition coefficient (logP) or distribution coefficient (logD) determination methods were revisited and assessed comprehensively. Classic isocratic and some gradient RPLC methods were conducted and evaluated for neutral, weak acid and basic compounds. Different lipophilicity indexes in logP or logD determination were discussed in detail, including the retention factor logk corresponding to neat water as mobile phase extrapolated via linear solvent strength (LSS) model from isocratic runs and calculated with software from gradient runs, the chromatographic hydrophobicity index (CHI), apparent gradient capacity factor (k') and gradient retention time (t). Among the lipophilicity indexes discussed, logk from whether isocratic or gradient elution methods best correlated with logP or logD. Therefore logk is recommended as the preferred lipophilicity index for logP or logD determination. logk easily calculated from methanol gradient runs might be the main candidate to replace logk calculated from classic isocratic run as the ideal lipophilicity index. These revisited RPLC methods were not applicable for strongly ionized compounds that are hardly ion-suppressed. A previously reported imperfect ion-pair RPLC method was attempted and further explored for studying distribution coefficients (logD) of sulfonic acids that totally ionized in the mobile phase. Notably, experimental logD values of sulfonic acids were given for the first time. The IP-RPLC method provided a distinct way to explore logD values of ionized compounds.
对基于反相液相色谱(RPLC)的正辛醇 - 水分配系数(logP)或分配系数(logD)测定方法进行了重新审视和全面评估。针对中性、弱酸和碱性化合物开展并评估了经典等度及一些梯度RPLC方法。详细讨论了logP或logD测定中不同的亲脂性指标,包括通过等度洗脱运行的线性溶剂强度(LSS)模型外推并以软件从梯度洗脱运行计算得出的以纯水为流动相时对应的保留因子logk、色谱疏水性指数(CHI)、表观梯度容量因子(k')和梯度保留时间(t)。在所讨论的亲脂性指标中,等度或梯度洗脱方法得到的logk与logP或logD的相关性最佳。因此,推荐将logk作为logP或logD测定的首选亲脂性指标。易于从甲醇梯度洗脱运行计算得出的logk可能是取代从经典等度洗脱运行计算得出的logk作为理想亲脂性指标的主要候选者。这些重新审视的RPLC方法不适用于几乎无法被离子抑制的强电离化合物。尝试并进一步探索了一种先前报道的不完善的离子对RPLC方法,用于研究在流动相中完全电离的磺酸的分配系数(logD)。值得注意的是,首次给出了磺酸的实验logD值。离子对RPLC方法为探索电离化合物的logD值提供了一种独特的途径。