Argyle J C, Benjamin D R, Lampkin B, Hammond D
Department of Pathology, Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Cancer. 1989 Jan 15;63(2):295-301. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890115)63:2<295::aid-cncr2820630215>3.0.co;2-1.
The French-American-British (FAB) classification system and some recent modifications were applied to 486 children with a diagnosis of acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) to determine the distribution of the subtypes in children, to document the extent of inter-observer variation in assigning subtypes, and to examine the reasons for the differences. The distribution of FAB subtypes of childhood ANLL was similar to that reported for adults. In the initial year of the study, the inter-observer concurrence between the institutional diagnosis and the reviewing pathologists was 50%, but in the more recent years, concurrence between institutions and the review pathologist has approached 80%, averaging around 73% for the entire study. Many problems remain to be solved with this classification system, including the imprecision in wording, the subjectiveness of the interpretation, errors due to the random distribution of cells, and the current lack of evidence that certain FAB subtypes, such as M1 and M2, differ significantly in terms of biological behavior and prognosis.
法国-美国-英国(FAB)分类系统及一些近期的修订版本被应用于486例诊断为急性非淋巴细胞白血病(ANLL)的儿童患者,以确定儿童患者中各亚型的分布情况,记录观察者在亚型分类过程中的差异程度,并探究存在差异的原因。儿童ANLL的FAB亚型分布与成人中报告的情况相似。在研究的第一年,机构诊断与复审病理学家之间的观察者间一致性为50%,但在最近几年,机构与复审病理学家之间的一致性已接近80%,整个研究的平均一致性约为73%。该分类系统仍有许多问题有待解决,包括措辞不精确、解释的主观性、细胞随机分布导致的误差,以及目前缺乏证据表明某些FAB亚型(如M1和M2)在生物学行为和预后方面存在显著差异。