Papageorgiou Spyridon N, Papadelli Anastasia A, Eliades Theodore
Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):176-194. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx052.
Insertion of orthodontic fixed appliances has been known to induce a mostly transient qualitative and quantitative alteration of the intraoral microbiota. However, the extent to which treatment with fixed appliances might have a lasting adverse effect on the periodontal attachment of the teeth has not yet been investigated in an evidence-based manner.
Aim of this systematic review was to assess the effect of comprehensive treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances on clinical attachment levels of adolescent and adult periodontally healthy patients.
Seven databases were searched from inception to February 2017.
Prospective non-randomized longitudinal clinical studies.
After duplicate study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment according to the Cochrane guidelines, Paule-Mandel random-effects meta-analyses of the clinical attachment loss and its 95 per cent confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
A total of 9 trials were identified that included 335 treated patients (at least 34 per cent male / 66 per cent female) with an average age of 22.6 years. The average pooled clinical attachment loss was 0.11 mm (9 studies; 335 patients; 95 per cent CI = 0.12 mm gain to 0.34 mm loss; P = 0.338) with high heterogeneity. Furthermore, one study hinted that a small amount of clinical attachment might be gained by intrusion of upper incisors. Additional analyses indicated that the results were robust to addition of untreated patient groups, while patient age and timing of outcome measurement might play an important role.
According to existing evidence from longitudinal clinical studies orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances has little to no clinically relevant effect on periodontal clinical attachment levels.
PROSPERO (CRD42017057042).
None.
已知正畸固定矫治器的佩戴会引起口腔内微生物群在质量和数量上的改变,且这种改变大多是暂时的。然而,固定矫治器治疗对牙齿牙周附着可能产生的长期不良影响,尚未得到循证研究。
本系统评价旨在评估固定正畸矫治器综合治疗对青少年和成年牙周健康患者临床附着水平的影响。
检索了7个数据库,检索时间从建库至2017年2月。
前瞻性非随机纵向临床研究。
根据Cochrane指南进行重复研究筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估后,计算临床附着丧失的Paule-Mandel随机效应荟萃分析及其95%置信区间(CI)。
共纳入9项试验,包括335例接受治疗的患者(男性至少占34%,女性占66%),平均年龄22.6岁。平均合并临床附着丧失为0.11mm(9项研究;335例患者;95%CI = 增加0.12mm至丧失0.34mm;P = 0.338),异质性高。此外,一项研究提示,上切牙的内收可能会增加少量临床附着。进一步分析表明,加入未治疗患者组后结果依然可靠,而患者年龄和结果测量时间可能起重要作用。
根据纵向临床研究的现有证据,固定矫治器正畸治疗对牙周临床附着水平几乎没有临床相关影响。
PROSPERO(CRD42017057042)。
无。