• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症肺炎合并耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者的抗生素策略及临床转归

Antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

机构信息

Master Program of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Ph.D. Program in Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Aug;24(8):908.e1-908.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.033
PMID:29108947
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate antibiotic prescribing patterns and effectiveness of different anti-carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) strategies for CRAB pneumonia.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study in three hospitals. During 2010-2015, adult ICU patients with CRAB pneumonia treated with at least one antimicrobial agent covering the CRAB isolate in vitro for more than 2 days were included. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyse the associations of anti-CRAB strategies with ICU mortality and other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 238 patients with CRAB pneumonia, tigecycline monotherapy (84, 35.3%) was the most common antibiotic strategy, followed by tigecycline with colistin (43, 18.1%), colistin monotherapy (34, 14.3%), colistin combination without tigecycline (33, 13.9%), tigecycline combination without colistin (32, 13.4%), and sulbactam-based therapy without tigecycline and colistin (12, 5.0%). In multivariate analysis, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher ICU mortality than non-tigecycline therapy (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19-4.46). There was no difference between colistin-based therapy and non-colistin therapy. Compared with tigecycline monotherapy, colistin monotherapy was associated with lower ICU mortality (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.88). Treatment failure analyses showed similar trends. Tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher treatment failure rate than non-tigecycline therapy (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.39-4.54), whereas colistin-based therapy was associated with lower treatment failure rate than non-colistin-based therapy (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline was commonly prescribed for CRAB pneumonia. However, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher ICU mortality and treatment failure. Our study suggests that colistin monotherapy may be a better antibiotic strategy for CRAB pneumonia.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查不同抗耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)策略在治疗 CRAB 肺炎中的抗生素应用模式和效果。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、回顾性研究,纳入了 2010 年至 2015 年期间在三家医院接受至少一种覆盖 CRAB 分离株的抗生素治疗超过 2 天的成人 ICU 患者。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析抗 CRAB 策略与 ICU 死亡率和其他临床结局的关系。

结果

在 238 例 CRAB 肺炎患者中,替加环素单药治疗(84 例,35.3%)是最常见的抗生素策略,其次是替加环素联合黏菌素(43 例,18.1%)、黏菌素单药治疗(34 例,14.3%)、不联合替加环素的黏菌素联合治疗(33 例,13.9%)、不联合黏菌素的替加环素联合治疗(32 例,13.4%)和不联合替加环素和黏菌素的舒巴坦治疗(12 例,5.0%)。多变量分析显示,替加环素治疗与 ICU 死亡率较高相关(调整后的 OR 2.30,95%CI 1.19-4.46)。黏菌素治疗与非黏菌素治疗之间无差异。与替加环素单药治疗相比,黏菌素单药治疗与 ICU 死亡率较低相关(aOR 0.30,95%CI 0.10-0.88)。治疗失败分析显示出类似的趋势。替加环素治疗与治疗失败率较高相关(aOR 2.51,95%CI 1.39-4.54),而黏菌素治疗与治疗失败率较低相关(aOR 0.48,95%CI 0.27-0.86)。

结论

替加环素常用于治疗 CRAB 肺炎。然而,替加环素治疗与 ICU 死亡率和治疗失败率较高相关。我们的研究表明,黏菌素单药治疗可能是治疗 CRAB 肺炎的更好抗生素策略。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.重症肺炎合并耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌感染患者的抗生素策略及临床转归
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Aug;24(8):908.e1-908.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.10.033. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
2
Carbapenem-resistant versus carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in a Greek intensive care unit: risk factors, clinical features and outcomes.希腊重症监护病房耐碳青霉烯类 versus 碳青霉烯类敏感鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症:危险因素、临床特征和结局。
Infection. 2010 Jun;38(3):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s15010-010-0008-1. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
3
Comparable Efficacy of Tigecycline versus Colistin Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients.替加环素与黏菌素治疗重症患者耐多药和广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎的疗效比较
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0150642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150642. eCollection 2016.
4
Colistin-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia.多黏菌素联合治疗广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Apr;43(4):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
5
Retrospective evaluation of colistin versus tigecycline for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii and/or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.回顾性评价黏菌素与替加环素治疗鲍曼不动杆菌和/或碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科感染的效果。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 Dec;40(10):983-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
In vitro synergistic activity of colistin with tigecycline or β-lactam antibiotic/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.黏菌素与替加环素或β-内酰胺类抗生素/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌的体外协同活性。
J Int Med Res. 2013 Dec;41(6):1830-7. doi: 10.1177/0300060513496172.
7
OXA-type Carbapenemases and Susceptibility of Colistin and Tigecycline Among Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Isolates from Patients with Bacteremia in Turkey.土耳其菌血症患者中耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌分离株的OXA型碳青霉烯酶及对黏菌素和替加环素的敏感性
Clin Lab. 2015;61(7):741-7. doi: 10.7754/clin.lab.2014.141116.
8
Evaluation of the Colistin-Carbapenem Combination in Clinical Isolates of Using the Checkerboard, Etest, and Time-Kill Curve Techniques.运用棋盘法、Etest法和时间杀菌曲线技术评估黏菌素-碳青霉烯类联合用药对[具体临床分离株]的效果
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 May 24;7:209. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00209. eCollection 2017.
9
The combined use of tigecycline with high-dose colistin might not be associated with higher survival in critically ill patients with bacteraemia due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.替加环素与高剂量黏菌素联合使用可能与碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症的危重症患者的生存率提高无关。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Jun;24(6):630-634. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
10
Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities and synergistic activities of antimicrobial combinations against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species: Acinetobacter baumannii versus Acinetobacter genospecies 3 and 13TU.比较耐碳青霉烯类不动杆菌属种(鲍曼不动杆菌与 3 型和 13TU 型基因种)对抗菌药物组合的体外抗微生物药敏活性和协同作用。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 Jul;70(3):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2011.03.003. Epub 2011 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
treatment strategies: a review of therapeutic challenges and considerations.治疗策略:治疗挑战与考量综述
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Aug 6;69(8):e0106324. doi: 10.1128/aac.01063-24. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Sulbactam for carbapenem-resistant infections: a literature review.舒巴坦用于耐碳青霉烯类感染:一项文献综述。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Apr 12;7(2):dlaf055. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf055. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
The Mortality of Colistin Monotherapy Colistin-Sulbactam for Carbapenem-Resistant Pneumonia: A Propensity Score Analysis.
多黏菌素单药治疗与多黏菌素-舒巴坦治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎的死亡率:一项倾向评分分析
Infect Chemother. 2025 Mar;57(1):138-147. doi: 10.3947/ic.2024.0125.
4
Mortality and clinical outcomes of colistin versus colistin-based combination therapy for infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in critically ill patients.多黏菌素与基于多黏菌素的联合治疗对重症患者耐多药鲍曼不动杆菌感染的死亡率及临床结局
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10781-1.
5
Carbapenem-resistant and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia; Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Current Therapeutic Approaches.耐碳青霉烯类与呼吸机相关性肺炎:流行病学、危险因素及当前治疗方法
J Res Pharm Pract. 2024 Dec 23;13(2):33-40. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_50_24. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
6
Efficiency of combination therapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.联合治疗与单一疗法治疗耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌感染的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02695-x.
7
Treatment Approaches for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Infections.耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌感染的治疗方法
Drugs. 2025 Jan;85(1):21-40. doi: 10.1007/s40265-024-02104-6. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
8
Comparing the Outcomes of Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based and Non-Cefoperazone/Sulbactam-Based Therapeutic Regimens in Patients with Multiresistant Infections-A Meta-Analysis.多耐药感染患者中基于头孢哌酮/舒巴坦与非头孢哌酮/舒巴坦治疗方案的疗效比较——一项荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Sep 23;13(9):907. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13090907.
9
Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant .治疗耐碳青霉烯类抗生素的感染。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jul 18;14:1395260. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1395260. eCollection 2024.
10
Optimizing Treatment for Carbapenem-Resistant Complex Infections: A Review of Current Evidence.优化耐碳青霉烯类复杂感染的治疗:当前证据综述
Infect Chemother. 2024 Jun;56(2):171-187. doi: 10.3947/ic.2024.0055.