Alwazzeh Marwan J, Algazaq Jumanah, Al-Salem Fatimah Ali, Alabkari Fatimah, Alwarthan Sara M, Alhajri Mashael, AlShehail Bashayer M, Alnimr Amani, Alrefaai Ahmad Wajeeh, Alsaihati Faten Hussain, Almuhanna Fahd Abdulaziz
Infectious Disease Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, & King Fahad Hospital of the University, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Pharmacy Practice Department, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10781-1.
Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii emerged as a threatening "superbug" with significant morbidity and mortality and limited antimicrobial therapy options. The results of different antibiotic combination studies are heterogeneous and controversial. Further comparative studies are crucial to overcome such difficult-to-treat infections and to improve patient outcomes. This study investigates the mortality and outcomes of colistin versus colistin-based combination therapy for infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in critically ill patients.
A retrospective observational study was conducted at an academic tertiary hospital in Khobar City, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were admitted from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, were included. The investigated primary outcome was 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes were one-year all-cause mortality, clinical cure, microbiologic eradication, and recurrence of Acinetobacter infections. Statistical comparisons were employed, and a P-value of ≤ .05 was considered significant.
Of the 178 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 47 received colistin only, and 131 received colistin in combinations (55 with carbapenems, 53 with tigecycline, and 23 with both). The estimated 30-day mortality rate of the study population was 22.5%, with statistically insignificant differences in 30-day mortality rates when the colistin group compared to cumulative colistin-based combination (23.4% vs. 22.1%; difference, 1.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.487-2.371; P = 0.858) or subgroups. However, colistin-based combination groups showed better secondary outcomes, with significantly less all-cause mortality and better clinical cure in colistin combination with carbapenems or tigecycline and less Acinetobacter infection recurrence in combination with carbapenems.
The study findings demonstrate the benefits of investigated colistin combination options that result in less one-year all-cause mortality, better clinical cure, higher microbiologic response, and less infection recurrence. However, no significant differences were observed regarding 30-day mortality. In addition, the study highlights the limitations of the available antimicrobial options and the crucial need for new effective antimicrobials and more successful combinations.
多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌已成为一种具有威胁性的“超级细菌”,其发病率和死亡率很高,且抗菌治疗选择有限。不同抗生素联合治疗的结果存在异质性且存在争议。进一步的比较研究对于克服此类难治性感染和改善患者预后至关重要。本研究调查了在重症患者中,多粘菌素与基于多粘菌素的联合治疗对多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致感染的死亡率和治疗结果。
在沙特阿拉伯东部省胡巴尔市的一家学术三级医院进行了一项回顾性观察研究。纳入了符合纳入标准且在2017年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间入院的患者。研究的主要结局是30天死亡率,次要结局是1年全因死亡率、临床治愈、微生物清除以及鲍曼不动杆菌感染复发。进行了统计比较,P值≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在178名符合纳入标准的患者中,47名仅接受了多粘菌素治疗,131名接受了多粘菌素联合治疗(55名联合碳青霉烯类、53名联合替加环素、23名联合两者)。研究人群的估计30天死亡率为22.5%,多粘菌素组与基于多粘菌素的累积联合治疗组(23.4%对22.1%;差异1.3个百分点;95%置信区间[CI],0.487 - 2.371;P = 0.858)或各亚组相比,30天死亡率在统计学上无显著差异。然而,基于多粘菌素的联合治疗组显示出更好的次要结局,多粘菌素联合碳青霉烯类或替加环素时全因死亡率显著更低且临床治愈更好,联合碳青霉烯类时鲍曼不动杆菌感染复发更少。
研究结果表明,所研究的多粘菌素联合治疗方案具有益处,可降低1年全因死亡率、提高临床治愈率、增强微生物学反应并减少感染复发。然而,在30天死亡率方面未观察到显著差异。此外,该研究突出了现有抗菌治疗选择的局限性以及对新型有效抗菌药物和更成功联合治疗的迫切需求。