Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;372(1736). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0469.
Meiotic recombination is necessary for successful gametogenesis in most sexually reproducing organisms and is a fundamental genomic parameter, influencing the efficacy of selection and the fate of new mutations. The molecular and evolutionary functions of recombination should impose strong selective constraints on the range of recombination rates. Yet, variation in recombination rate is observed on a variety of genomic and evolutionary scales. In the past decade, empirical studies have described variation in recombination rate within genomes, between individuals, between sexes, between populations and between species. At the same time, theoretical work has provided an increasingly detailed picture of the evolutionary advantages to recombination. Perhaps surprisingly, the causes of natural variation in recombination rate remain poorly understood. We argue that empirical and theoretical approaches to understand the evolution of recombination have proceeded largely independently of each other. Most models that address the evolution of recombination rate were created to explain the evolutionary advantage of recombination rather than quantitative differences in rate among individuals. Conversely, most empirical studies aim to describe variation in recombination rate, rather than to test evolutionary hypotheses. In this Perspective, we argue that efforts to integrate the rich bodies of empirical and theoretical work on recombination rate are crucial to moving this field forward. We provide new directions for the development of theory and the production of data that will jointly close this gap.This article is part of the themed issue 'Evolutionary causes and consequences of recombination rate variation in sexual organisms'.
减数分裂重组对于大多数有性生殖生物的配子发生是必要的,是一个基本的基因组参数,影响选择的效率和新突变的命运。重组的分子和进化功能应该对重组率的范围施加强烈的选择约束。然而,在各种基因组和进化尺度上都观察到了重组率的变化。在过去的十年中,实证研究已经描述了基因组内、个体之间、性别之间、种群之间和物种之间重组率的变化。与此同时,理论工作也为重组的进化优势提供了越来越详细的描述。也许令人惊讶的是,重组率自然变异的原因仍未得到很好的理解。我们认为,理解重组进化的经验和理论方法在很大程度上彼此独立。大多数解决重组率进化的模型都是为了解释重组的进化优势而创建的,而不是个体之间的重组率的定量差异。相反,大多数实证研究旨在描述重组率的变化,而不是检验进化假说。在这篇观点文章中,我们认为,努力整合重组率的丰富的经验和理论工作,对于推动这一领域的发展至关重要。我们为理论的发展和数据的产生提供了新的方向,这将共同弥合这一差距。本文是主题为“有性生物中重组率变异的进化原因和后果”的一部分。