• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减重手术网站信息质量评估。

Quality Assessment of Information on Bariatric Surgery Websites.

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Surgery- and Transplantation, University Hospital of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich, 8091, Switzerland.

University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2018 May;28(5):1240-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2983-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-017-2983-0
PMID:29110245
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on bariatric surgery in the internet using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool.

METHODS

Systematic review of information on bariatric surgery in the internet by entering common search terms into five search engines. The top 100 websites of every search term and search engine were assessed using the validated EQIP tool (maximum score, 36), which entails points for content, structure, and identification data of a given website. Websites at or above the 99th percentile were analyzed separately (n = 8).

RESULTS

The median EQIP score of all included websites (n = 463) was 17 (IQR 15-19). While information on the medical problem, the indication for surgery, or the treatment alternatives was present in 84% of all websites, only 10% of the included websites contained adequate information on postoperative complications. Although quantitative information on incidence (37.5%) and treatment of complications (12.5%) was significantly better in the top 99th percentile websites, the content of relevant information such as occurrence and treatment of complications was still very limited.

CONCLUSION

The overall quality of patient information on bariatric surgery in the internet is relatively poor. Especially incidence of complications and their treatment are rarely reported even on websites with a 99th percentile EQIP score.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用改良的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients(EQIP)工具评估互联网上有关减重手术的患者信息质量。

方法

通过输入常见的搜索词进入五个搜索引擎,对互联网上有关减重手术的信息进行系统回顾。使用经过验证的 EQIP 工具(最高得分为 36 分)评估每个搜索词和搜索引擎的前 100 个网站,该工具涉及给定网站的内容、结构和识别数据的分数。分析处于或高于第 99 百分位的网站(n=8)。

结果

所有纳入网站(n=463)的 EQIP 中位数得分为 17(IQR 15-19)。虽然所有网站中 84%都提供了有关医疗问题、手术指征或治疗选择的信息,但只有 10%的纳入网站包含了有关术后并发症的充分信息。尽管关于并发症发生率(37.5%)和并发症治疗(12.5%)的定量信息在 99 百分位网站中明显更好,但有关并发症的发生和治疗等相关信息的内容仍然非常有限。

结论

互联网上有关减重手术的患者信息整体质量较差。即使在 EQIP 得分达到 99 百分位的网站上,有关并发症发生率及其治疗的信息也很少报道。

相似文献

1
Quality Assessment of Information on Bariatric Surgery Websites.减重手术网站信息质量评估。
Obes Surg. 2018 May;28(5):1240-1247. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2983-0.
2
Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术互联网信息质量评估
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
3
Quality of Information About Bariatric Surgery on the Internet: A Two-Continent Comparison of Website Content.互联网上减重手术信息质量:两大陆网站内容比较
Obes Surg. 2020 May;30(5):1736-1744. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04375-5.
4
Quality assessment of patient information on the management of gallstone disease in the internet - A systematic analysis using the modified ensuring quality information for patients tool.互联网上胆石病管理患者信息质量评估——使用改良的确保患者信息质量工具进行的系统分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Dec;21(12):1632-1640. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.355. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
5
Quality assessment of patient information on orthognathic surgery on the internet.互联网上正颌外科患者信息质量评估。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;48(7):661-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.004. Epub 2020 May 28.
6
Using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool to Assess Patient Information on Appendicitis Websites: Systematic Search and Evaluation.使用 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 工具评估阑尾炎网站上的患者信息:系统搜索和评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 26;23(3):e22618. doi: 10.2196/22618.
7
Quality of information for women seeking breast augmentation in the Internet.互联网上寻求隆胸女性的信息质量。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016 Oct;50(5):262-71. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2016.1154469. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
8
Carpal tunnel syndrome: Analysis of online patient information with the EQIP tool.腕管综合征:使用EQIP工具对在线患者信息进行分析
Chir Main. 2015 Jun;34(3):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Does the Internet Provide Quality Information on Metoidioplasty? Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool to Evaluate Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Online Information on Metoidioplasty.互联网上有关阴道形成术的信息质量如何?利用改良的患者质量信息保障工具评估人工智能生成的和有关阴道形成术的在线信息。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 May 1;92(5S Suppl 3):S361-S365. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003797.
10
Single-stage conversions from failed gastric band to sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from the United Kingdom National Bariatric Surgical Registry.一期胃旁路术转为袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗失败胃束带术的比较:来自英国国家减重手术登记处的结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1516-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Bariatric surgery decision-making of adults with obesity: a grounded theory study.肥胖成年人的减肥手术决策:一项扎根理论研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 11;25(1):2725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24035-x.
2
Online Search Trends Related to Bariatric Surgery and Their Relationship with Utilization in Australia.在线搜索与减肥手术相关的趋势及其与澳大利亚利用率的关系。
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3412-3419. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07457-1. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
3
Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool.

本文引用的文献

1
Erratum to: Bariatric Surgery and Endoluminal Procedures: IFSO Worldwide Survey 2014.《肥胖症外科手术与腔内手术:国际肥胖症外科联盟2014年全球调查》勘误
Obes Surg. 2017 Sep;27(9):2290-2292. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2773-8.
2
Quality of information for women seeking breast augmentation in the Internet.互联网上寻求隆胸女性的信息质量。
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016 Oct;50(5):262-71. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2016.1154469. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Carpal tunnel syndrome: Analysis of online patient information with the EQIP tool.腕管综合征:使用EQIP工具对在线患者信息进行分析
利用改良后的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 工具评估上消化道内镜相关在线患者信息的质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2024 Nov;106(8):672-681. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
A Systematic Quality Assessment of Online Resources on Eyelid Ptosis Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (mEQIP) Tool.采用改良的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients(mEQIP)工具对眼睑下垂相关在线资源进行系统质量评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 May;48(9):1688-1697. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-03862-0. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
5
Popularity of Surgical and Pharmacological Obesity Treatment Methods Searched by Google Users: the Retrospective Analysis of Google Trends Statistics in 2004-2022.谷歌用户搜索的外科和药物肥胖治疗方法的流行度:2004-2022 年谷歌趋势统计数据的回顾性分析。
Obes Surg. 2024 Mar;34(3):882-891. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06971-y. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
6
Quality of Web-Based Sickle Cell Disease Resources for Health Care Transition: Website Content Analysis.用于医疗保健过渡的镰状细胞病网络资源质量:网站内容分析
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Dec 13;6:e48924. doi: 10.2196/48924.
7
Reliability of Medical Information Provided by ChatGPT: Assessment Against Clinical Guidelines and Patient Information Quality Instrument.ChatGPT 提供的医学信息的可靠性:与临床指南和患者信息质量工具的评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 30;25:e47479. doi: 10.2196/47479.
8
Readability of patient education materials for bariatric surgery.减重手术患者教育材料的可读性。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6519-6525. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10153-3. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
9
Assessment of electronic patient education materials for adolescent bariatric surgery candidates: An environment scan.青少年肥胖症手术候选者的电子患者教育材料评估:一项环境扫描。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 24;2:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100143. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Inguinal hernia repair: a systematic analysis of online patient information using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool.腹股沟疝修补术:使用改良的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 工具对在线患者信息进行系统分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2022 Apr;104(4):242-248. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0174. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
Chir Main. 2015 Jun;34(3):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 26.
4
Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy.袖状胃切除术互联网信息质量评估
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):539-44. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
5
Donor information for living donor liver transplantation: where can comprehensive information be found?活体供肝移植的供者信息:在哪里可以找到全面的信息?
Liver Transpl. 2012 Aug;18(8):892-900. doi: 10.1002/lt.23442.
6
Evolution of health web certification through the HONcode experience.通过健康在线规范(HONcode)认证体系所体现的健康网站认证的发展历程。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:53-7.
7
What is the quality of information about bariatric surgery on the internet?互联网上有关减肥手术的信息质量如何?
Obes Surg. 2008 Nov;18(11):1455-9. doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9507-x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
8
Measuring quality of patient information documents with an expanded EQIP scale.使用扩展的EQIP量表测量患者信息文件的质量。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):407-11. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
9
Netting the evidence: finding pearls, not sewage.筛选证据:寻找明珠,而非糟粕。
Singapore Med J. 2006 Dec;47(12):1023-9.
10
Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey.健康信息的信任与来源:互联网的影响及其对医疗保健提供者的启示:首次健康信息国家趋势调查结果
Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618-24. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.22.2618.