Department of Bioengineering and ‡The UC Berkeley/UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California Berkeley , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Anal Chem. 2017 Dec 5;89(23):12787-12796. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03096. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
While protein electrophoresis conducted in capillaries and microchannels offers high-resolution separations, such formats can be cumbersome to parallelize for single-cell analysis. One approach for realizing large numbers of concurrent separations is open microfluidics (i.e., no microchannels). In an open microfluidic device adapted for single-cell electrophoresis, we perform 100s to 1000s of simultaneous separations of endogenous proteins. The microscope slide-sized device contains cells isolated in microwells located in a ∼40 μm polyacrylamide gel. The gel supports protein electrophoresis after concurrent in situ chemical lysis of each isolated cell. During electrophoresis, Joule (or resistive) heating degrades separation performance. Joule heating effects are expected to be acute in open microfluidic devices, where a single, high-conductivity buffer expedites the transition from cell lysis to protein electrophoresis. Here, we test three key assertions. First, Joule heating substantially impacts analytical sensitivity due to diffusive losses of protein out of the open microfluidic electrophoretic (EP) cytometry device. Second, increased analyte diffusivity due to autothermal runaway Joule heating is a dominant mechanism that reduces separation resolution in EP cytometry. Finally, buffer exchange reduces diffusive losses and band broadening, even when handling single-cell lysate protein concentrations in an open device. We develop numerical simulations of Joule heating-enhanced diffusion during electrophoresis and observe ∼50% protein loss out of the gel, which is reduced using the buffer exchange. Informed by analytical model predictions of separation resolution (with Joule heating), we empirically demonstrate nearly fully resolved separations of proteins with molecular mass differences of just 4 kDa or 12% (GAPDH, 36 kDa; PS6, 32 kDa) in each of 129 single cells. The attained separation performance with buffer exchange is relevant to detection of currently unmeasurable protein isoforms responsible for cancer progression.
虽然在毛细管和微通道中进行的蛋白质电泳提供了高分辨率的分离,但这种格式对于单细胞分析来说可能很麻烦,难以并行化。实现大量并行分离的一种方法是开式微流控(即没有微通道)。在适用于单细胞电泳的开式微流控装置中,我们同时对数百到数千个内源性蛋白质进行分离。这种显微镜载玻片大小的装置包含位于约 40 µm 聚丙烯酰胺凝胶中的微孔中的分离细胞。凝胶在每个分离细胞的原位化学裂解后支持蛋白质电泳。在电泳过程中,焦耳(或电阻)加热会降低分离性能。在开式微流控装置中,由于单个高导电性缓冲液加速了从细胞裂解到蛋白质电泳的转变,焦耳加热效应预计会很严重。在这里,我们检验了三个关键假设。首先,由于蛋白质从开放式电泳(EP)细胞术装置中扩散损失,焦耳加热会极大地影响分析灵敏度。其次,由于自热失控焦耳加热导致的分析物扩散率增加是降低 EP 细胞术分离分辨率的主要机制。最后,即使在开放式设备中处理单细胞裂解物蛋白浓度时,缓冲液交换也可以减少扩散损失和带展宽。我们开发了电泳过程中焦耳加热增强扩散的数值模拟,并观察到约 50%的蛋白质从凝胶中损失,使用缓冲液交换可以减少这种损失。根据带有焦耳加热的分离分辨率的分析模型预测,我们通过经验证明,在 129 个单个细胞中的每个细胞中,对于分子量差异仅为 4 kDa 或 12%(GAPDH,36 kDa;PS6,32 kDa)的蛋白质,几乎完全实现了分离。使用缓冲液交换获得的分离性能与检测目前无法测量的负责癌症进展的蛋白质同工型有关。