School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), P.O Box 1578-40100, Kisumu, Kenya.
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Nov 6;10(1):548. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2489-6.
The development and spread of resistance among local vectors to the major classes of insecticides used in Long-Lasting Insecticidal Nets (LLINs) and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) poses a major challenge to malaria vector control programs worldwide. The main methods of evaluating insecticide resistance in malaria vectors are the WHO tube bioassay and CDC bottle assays, with their weakness being determination of resistance at a fixed dose for variable populations. The CDC bottle assay using different insecticide dosages has proved applicable in ascertaining the intensity of resistance.
We determined the status and intensity of permethrin resistance and investigated the efficacy of commonly used LLINs (PermaNet® 2.0, PermaNet® 3.0 and Olyset®) against 3-5 day-old adult female Anopheles mosquitoes from four sub-counties; Teso, Bondo, Rachuonyo and Nyando in western Kenya. Knockdown was assessed to 4 doses of permethrin; 1× (21.5 μg/ml), 2× (43 μg/ml), 5× (107.5 μg/ml) and 10× (215 μg/ml) using CDC bottle assays.
Mortality for 0.75% permethrin ranged from 23.5% to 96.1% in the WHO tube assay. Intensity of permethrin resistance was highest in Barkanyango Bondo, with 84% knockdown at the 30 min diagnostic time when exposed to the 10× dose. When exposed to the LLINs, mortality ranged between- 0-39% for Olyset®, 12-88% for PermaNet® 2.0 and 26-89% for PermaNet® 3.0. The efficacy of nets was reduced in Bondo and Teso. Results from this study show that there was confirmed resistance in all the sites; however, intensity assays were able to differentiate Bondo and Teso as the sites with the highest levels of resistance, which coincidentally were the two sub-counties with reduced net efficacy.
There was a reduced efficacy of nets in areas with high resistance portraying that at certain intensities of resistance, vector control using LLINs may be compromised. It is necessary to incorporate intensity assays in order to determine the extent of threat that resistance poses to malaria control.
在长效杀虫剂处理蚊帐(LLINs)和室内滞留喷洒(IRS)中使用的主要杀虫剂类别,当地传播媒介的抗药性的发展和传播对全球疟疾媒介控制计划构成了重大挑战。评估疟疾传播媒介抗药性的主要方法是世界卫生组织管生物测定法和疾病预防控制中心瓶测法,但它们的弱点在于针对不同人群确定固定剂量的抗药性。使用不同杀虫剂剂量的疾病预防控制中心瓶测法已被证明适用于确定抗药性的强度。
我们确定了肯尼亚西部四个县(特索、邦多、拉乔尼和尼亚当)的 3-5 日龄成年雌性按蚊对拟除虫菊酯的抗药性现状和强度,并调查了常用的 LLINs(PermaNet® 2.0、PermaNet® 3.0 和 Olyset®)的效果。使用疾病预防控制中心瓶测法评估了 4 种拟除虫菊酯剂量的击倒情况:1×(21.5μg/ml)、2×(43μg/ml)、5×(107.5μg/ml)和 10×(215μg/ml)。
在世界卫生组织管生物测定法中,0.75%拟除虫菊酯的死亡率范围为 23.5%至 96.1%。在 Barkanyango Bondo,当暴露于 10×剂量时,30 分钟诊断时间的击倒率高达 84%,表明拟除虫菊酯抗药性最强。当接触到 LLINs 时,Olyset®的死亡率在 0%至 39%之间,PermaNet® 2.0 的死亡率在 12%至 88%之间,PermaNet® 3.0 的死亡率在 26%至 89%之间。邦多和特索的网具效果降低。这项研究的结果表明,所有地点都存在确证的抗药性;然而,强度测定能够将邦多和特索区分开来,表明这两个县的抗药性水平最高,巧合的是,这两个县的网具效果都降低了。
在抗药性高的地区,网具的效果降低,表明在某些抗药性强度下,使用 LLINs 进行病媒控制可能会受到影响。有必要结合强度测定法来确定抗药性对疟疾控制构成的威胁程度。