Suppr超能文献

一种用于预测非癫痫性发作的简单临床评分。

A simple clinical score for prediction of nonepileptic seizures.

作者信息

Rao Sindhu R, Slater Jeremy D, Kalamangalam Giridhar P

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Dec;77:50-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Nov 5.

Abstract

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), often mistaken for epilepsy in community practice, require inpatient video-EEG (VEEG) monitoring for diagnostic confirmation. We developed a simple score designed for use in an outpatient setting to predict the subsequent VEEG diagnosis of PNES. We retrospectively compared fifty-five consecutive patients with VEEG-proven PNES (N=55) with a group of randomly selected patients with VEEG-proven epilepsy (N=55). Patients were divided into two groups: I) a 'truly retrospective' group of 27 patients with PNES and 27 patients with epilepsy whose data served to develop the score, and II) a 'pseudoprospective' group of 28 patients each with PNES and epilepsy to whom the score was applied. Six features in the history of the Group I cohort appeared more prominent in patients with PNES than patients with epilepsy and were assigned escalating numerical values as follows: number of declared drug allergies (0, 0.5, 1), number of declared comorbidities (0, 0.5, 1), number of previous invasive medical interventions of any type (0, 0.5, 1), and a history of significant psychological or physical trauma (0 or 1). In addition, a score was assigned to verbal description of the seizures themselves as being consistent (=0), atypical (=1), or indeterminate (=0.5) for epilepsy. The values were added to yield an omnibus score ranging from 0 to 6. Scoring of Group II subjects in a blinded fashion revealed that in general patients with PNES had higher scores, and the majority obtained a score >2; most patients with epilepsy scored <1.5. Group difference in the mean between the PNES and epilepsy cohort was highly significant (p<0.0001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Our score is a simple clinical instrument based on the patient history that may find use in the triage of patients awaiting hospitalization for VEEG and in pre-VEEG counseling.

摘要

心理性非癫痫发作(PNES)在社区医疗实践中常被误诊为癫痫,需要住院进行视频脑电图(VEEG)监测以确诊。我们制定了一个简单的评分系统,用于门诊环境,以预测随后VEEG对PNES的诊断。我们回顾性比较了55例经VEEG证实为PNES的连续患者(N = 55)和一组随机选择的经VEEG证实为癫痫的患者(N = 55)。患者分为两组:I)“真正回顾性”组,包括27例PNES患者和27例癫痫患者,其数据用于制定评分系统;II)“假前瞻性”组,每组包括28例PNES患者和癫痫患者,将评分系统应用于这些患者。I组队列病史中的六个特征在PNES患者中比癫痫患者更为突出,并赋予递增的数值如下:申报的药物过敏数量(0、0.5、1)、申报的合并症数量(0、0.5、1)、既往任何类型的侵入性医疗干预数量(0、0.5、1)以及重大心理或身体创伤史(0或1)。此外,根据癫痫发作的言语描述是否符合(=0)、不典型(=1)或不确定(=0.5)赋予一个分数。将这些值相加得出一个综合分数,范围从0到6。以盲法对II组受试者进行评分显示,一般来说,PNES患者得分较高,大多数得分>2;大多数癫痫患者得分<1.5。PNES和癫痫队列之间的平均组间差异非常显著(p<0.0001,Wilcoxon秩和检验)。我们的评分系统是一种基于患者病史的简单临床工具,可用于对等待住院进行VEEG检查的患者进行分诊以及VEEG检查前的咨询。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验