• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DDESVSFS:一种用于癫痫发作与功能性发作鉴别诊断的简单、快速、全面的筛查工具。

DDESVSFS: A simple, rapid and comprehensive screening tool for the Differential Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures VS Functional Seizures.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2021 Mar;171:106563. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106563. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106563
PMID:33517166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8092190/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Functional seizures (FS) are often misclassified as epileptic seizures (ES). This study aimed to create an easy to use but comprehensive screening tool to guide further evaluation of patients presenting with this diagnostic dilemma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic, clinical and diagnostic data were collected on patients admitted for video-EEG monitoring for clarification of their diagnosis. Upon discharge, patients were classified as having ES vs FS. Using the collected characteristics and video-EEG diagnosis, we created a multivariable logistic regression model to identify predictors of ES. Then, we trained an integer-coefficient model with the most frequently selected predictors, creating a pointing system coined DDESVSFS, with scores ranging from -17 to +8 points.

RESULTS

43 patients with FS and 165 patients with ES were recruited. In the final integer-coefficient model, 8 predictors were identified as significant in differentiating ES from FS: normal electroencephalogram (-3 points), predisposing factors for FS (-3 points), increased number of comorbidities (-3 points), semiology suggestive of FS (-4 points), increased seizure frequency (-4 points), longer disease duration (+3 points), antiepileptic polypharmacy (+2 points) and compliance with antiepileptic drugs (+3 points). Cumulative scores of ≤ -9 points carried <5% predictive value for ES, while cumulative scores of ≥ -1 points carried >95% predictive value. The model performed well (AUC: 0.923, sensitivity: 0.945, specificity: 0.698).

CONCLUSIONS

We propose DDESVSFS as a simple, rapid and comprehensive prediction score for the Differential Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures VS Functional Seizures. Large prospective studies are needed to evaluate its utility in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

功能性发作(FS)常被误诊为癫痫发作(ES)。本研究旨在创建一种易于使用但全面的筛选工具,以指导对出现这种诊断难题的患者进行进一步评估。

材料与方法

收集入院进行视频脑电图监测以明确诊断的患者的人口统计学、临床和诊断数据。出院时,患者被分类为 ES 或 FS。使用收集到的特征和视频脑电图诊断,我们建立了多变量逻辑回归模型来识别 ES 的预测因素。然后,我们使用最常选择的预测因素训练整数系数模型,创建一个命名为 DDESVSFS 的评分系统,分数范围为-17 至+8 分。

结果

共纳入 43 例 FS 和 165 例 ES 患者。在最终的整数系数模型中,有 8 个预测因素被确定为区分 ES 和 FS 的重要因素:正常脑电图(-3 分)、FS 的易患因素(-3 分)、合并症数量增加(-3 分)、半侧发作提示 FS(-4 分)、发作频率增加(-4 分)、疾病持续时间较长(+3 分)、抗癫痫药多药治疗(+2 分)和对癫痫药物的依从性(+3 分)。累积得分≤-9 分对 ES 的预测价值<5%,而累积得分≥-1 分对 ES 的预测价值>95%。该模型性能良好(AUC:0.923,灵敏度:0.945,特异性:0.698)。

结论

我们提出 DDESVSFS 作为一种简单、快速和全面的预测评分,用于癫痫发作与功能性发作的鉴别诊断。需要进行大型前瞻性研究来评估其在临床实践中的应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/620d701cee57/nihms-1696449-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/9c8495aeba02/nihms-1696449-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/c85ada9b02fe/nihms-1696449-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/620d701cee57/nihms-1696449-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/9c8495aeba02/nihms-1696449-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/c85ada9b02fe/nihms-1696449-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fa8/8092190/620d701cee57/nihms-1696449-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
DDESVSFS: A simple, rapid and comprehensive screening tool for the Differential Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures VS Functional Seizures.DDESVSFS:一种用于癫痫发作与功能性发作鉴别诊断的简单、快速、全面的筛查工具。
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Mar;171:106563. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106563. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
2
Diagnostic implications of review-of-systems questionnaires to differentiate epileptic seizures from psychogenic seizures.系统回顾问卷对鉴别癫痫发作与精神性发作的诊断意义。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Apr;69:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
3
[Phenomenology and psychiatric origins of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures].[心因性非癫痫性发作的现象学与精神科起源]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2004 Jan-Feb;132(1-2):22-7. doi: 10.2298/sarh0402022r.
4
Comparison of postictal semiology and behavior in psychogenic nonepileptic and epileptic seizures.心因性非癫痫性发作与癫痫性发作的发作后症状学及行为比较。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
5
Differentiating epilepsy from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures using neuropsychological test data.利用神经心理学测试数据鉴别癫痫与精神性非癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Oct;87:39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Patients' and caregivers' contributions for differentiating epileptic from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Value and limitations of self-reporting questionnaires: A pilot study.患者和照护者对鉴别癫痫性与非痫性发作的贡献。自报告问卷的价值和局限性:一项初步研究。
Seizure. 2017 Dec;53:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
How reliable is ictal duration to differentiate psychogenic nonepileptic seizures from epileptic seizures?发作期持续时间用于区分精神性非癫痫性发作和癫痫性发作的可靠性如何?
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Jan;66:127-131. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
8
Personality traits, illness behaviors, and psychiatric comorbidity in individuals with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), epilepsy, and other nonepileptic seizures (oNES): Differentiating between the conditions.人格特质、疾病行为与心因性非癫痫性发作(PNES)、癫痫和其他非癫痫性发作(oNES)患者的精神共病:鉴别这些病症。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Sep;98(Pt A):210-219. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.05.043. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
9
Prolactin levels as a criterion to differentiate between psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and epileptic seizures: A systematic review.催乳素水平作为区分精神性非癫痫发作和癫痫发作的标准:系统评价。
Epilepsy Res. 2021 Jan;169:106508. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106508. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
10
Home video prediction of epileptic vs. nonepileptic seizures in US veterans.美国退伍军人的家庭视频预测癫痫发作与非癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Apr;117:107811. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107811. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Applications to Epilepsy: a Review for the Practicing Epileptologist.机器学习与人工智能在癫痫中的应用:给癫痫科执业医师的综述
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Dec;23(12):869-879. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01318-7. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
2
Self-Reported Severity and Causes of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Epileptic or Functional Seizures.癫痫性发作或功能性发作患者创伤性脑损伤的自我报告严重程度及病因
Neurol Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;12(6):e189-e198. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200098.
3
All That Shakes Is Not Status Epilepticus.

本文引用的文献

1
Caregiver burden in psychogenic non-epileptic seizures.心因性非癲癇性發作患者的照護者負擔。
Seizure. 2020 Oct;81:13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
2
Clinical characteristics of functional (psychogenic nonepileptic) seizures: An international retrospective study.功能性(心因性非癲痫性)发作的临床特征:一项国际回顾性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Oct;111:107197. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107197. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Socioeconomic disparities in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures and their caregivers.
并非所有抽搐都是癫痫持续状态。
Epilepsy Curr. 2021 Dec 14;22(2):97-99. doi: 10.1177/15357597211067377. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
心因性非癫痫性发作患者及其照护者的社会经济差异。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107160. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107160. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Machine learning as a diagnostic decision aid for patients with transient loss of consciousness.机器学习作为短暂意识丧失患者的诊断决策辅助手段。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;10(2):96-105. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000726.
5
Terminology for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Making the case for "functional seizures".心因性非癲痫性发作术语:支持“功能性发作”。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Mar;104(Pt A):106895. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.106895. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
6
Structural brain abnormalities in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.精神性非癫痫性发作患者的结构性脑异常。
Neurol Sci. 2020 Mar;41(3):555-559. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04108-7. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
7
Value of witness observations in the differential diagnosis of transient loss of consciousness.证人观察在鉴别诊断短暂性意识丧失中的价值。
Neurology. 2019 Feb 26;92(9):e895-e904. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007017. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
8
An objective score to identify psychogenic seizures based on age of onset and history.基于发病年龄和病史识别心因性发作的客观评分。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Mar;80:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.11.035. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
9
A simple clinical score for prediction of nonepileptic seizures.一种用于预测非癫痫性发作的简单临床评分。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Dec;77:50-52. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
10
Association of an Electroencephalography-Based Risk Score With Seizure Probability in Hospitalized Patients.基于脑电图的风险评分与住院患者癫痫发作概率的关联
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Dec 1;74(12):1419-1424. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2459.