• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Methodology and Demographics of a Brief Adolescent Alcohol Screen Validation Study.一项简短青少年酒精筛查验证研究的方法学与人口统计学
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Nov;35(11):737-744. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001221.
2
Reliability and Validity of a Two-Question Alcohol Screen in the Pediatric Emergency Department.儿科急诊科两问题酒精筛查的信度与效度
Pediatrics. 2016 Dec;138(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-0691.
3
Screening for Adolescent Alcohol Use in the Emergency Department: What Does It Tell Us About Cannabis, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use?急诊科青少年饮酒筛查:它能告诉我们有关大麻、烟草和其他药物使用的情况吗?
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(6):1007-1016. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1558251. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
4
Predictive Validity of a 2-Question Alcohol Screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-Year Follow-up.1 年、2 年和 3 年随访时,2 个问题酒精筛查的预测效度。
Pediatrics. 2019 Mar;143(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
5
Identifying adolescents with alcohol use disorder: Optimal screening using the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism screening guide.识别有酒精使用障碍的青少年:使用国家酒精滥用和酗酒研究所筛查指南进行最佳筛查。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2018 Aug;32(5):508-516. doi: 10.1037/adb0000377. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
6
Is the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Screening Guide Useful for Identifying Adolescents at Risk for Later Cigarette Smoking? A Prospective Study in Primary Care Clinics.国家酒精滥用和酒精中毒研究所筛查指南是否有助于识别日后有吸烟风险的青少年?初级保健诊所的前瞻性研究。
J Addict Med. 2019 Mar/Apr;13(2):119-122. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000459.
7
Use of the screening suggested by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and of a newly derived tool for the detection of unhealthy alcohol drinkers among surgical patients.使用国家酒精滥用和酒精中毒研究所建议的筛查方法和新开发的工具,在外科患者中检测不健康的饮酒者。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012 Jan;73(1):126-33. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2012.73.126.
8
Comparison between the WHO and NIAAA criteria for binge drinking on drinking features and alcohol-related aftermaths: Results from a cross-sectional study among eight emergency wards in France.世界卫生组织(WHO)与美国国立酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所(NIAAA)关于暴饮的标准在饮酒特征及酒精相关后果方面的比较:法国八个急诊科的横断面研究结果
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Jun 1;175:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.034. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
A Screening Tool for Assessing Alcohol Use Risk among Medically Vulnerable Youth.一种用于评估医学上易受伤害青少年酒精使用风险的筛查工具。
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156240. eCollection 2016.
10
Reliability and Validity of the Newton Screen for Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse in a Pediatric Emergency Department Sample.牛顿屏幕在儿科急诊样本中用于酒精和大麻滥用的可靠性和有效性。
J Pediatr. 2019 Jul;210:154-160.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.038. Epub 2019 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Can accurate demographic information about people who use prescription medications nonmedically be derived from Twitter?能否从 Twitter 上获取非医疗目的使用处方药物人群的准确人口统计学信息?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 21;120(8):e2207391120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2207391120. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Association of Physical Activity, Sports, and Screen Time With Adolescent Behaviors in Youth Who Visit the Pediatric Emergency Department.青少年就诊于儿科急诊时,身体活动、运动和屏幕时间与行为的关联。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2022 May;61(4):335-346. doi: 10.1177/00099228221075094. Epub 2022 Feb 13.
3
Adolescent alcohol use predicts cannabis use over a three year follow-up period.青少年饮酒会预测其在接下来的三年随访中使用大麻。
Subst Abus. 2022;43(1):514-519. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2021.1949665. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
4
Screening Adolescent Trauma Patients for Substance Use at 10 Pediatric Trauma Centers.在 10 家儿科创伤中心对青少年创伤患者进行物质使用筛查。
J Trauma Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;27(6):313-318. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000537.
5
Using REDCap and Apple ResearchKit to integrate patient questionnaires and clinical decision support into the electronic health record to improve sexually transmitted infection testing in the emergency department.利用 REDCap 和 Apple ResearchKit 将患者问卷和临床决策支持整合到电子健康记录中,以改善急诊科的性传播感染检测。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;27(2):265-273. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz182.
6
Sex Without Contraceptives in a Multicenter Study of Adolescent Emergency Department Patients.无避孕措施性行为:一项多中心青少年急诊患者研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;27(4):283-290. doi: 10.1111/acem.13867. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
7
Predictive Validity of the CRAFFT for Substance Use Disorder.CRAFFT 用于物质使用障碍的预测效度。
Pediatrics. 2019 Aug;144(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3415. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Newton Screen for Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse in a Pediatric Emergency Department Sample.牛顿屏幕在儿科急诊样本中用于酒精和大麻滥用的可靠性和有效性。
J Pediatr. 2019 Jul;210:154-160.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.038. Epub 2019 Apr 6.
9
Predictive Validity of a 2-Question Alcohol Screen at 1-, 2-, and 3-Year Follow-up.1 年、2 年和 3 年随访时,2 个问题酒精筛查的预测效度。
Pediatrics. 2019 Mar;143(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2001. Epub 2019 Feb 19.
10
Screening for Adolescent Alcohol Use in the Emergency Department: What Does It Tell Us About Cannabis, Tobacco, and Other Drug Use?急诊科青少年饮酒筛查:它能告诉我们有关大麻、烟草和其他药物使用的情况吗?
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(6):1007-1016. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1558251. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The factor structure of the Reckless Behavior Questionnaire.《鲁莽行为问卷》的因子结构。
J Youth Adolesc. 1992 Jun;21(3):305-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01537020.
2
Brief emergency department interventions for youth who use alcohol and other drugs: a systematic review.针对使用酒精和其他毒品的青少年的急诊科简短干预措施:一项系统综述。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013 May;29(5):673-84. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31828ed325.
3
Methodology of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System--2013.《2013 年青少年健康危险行为监测系统方法学》。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013 Mar 1;62(RR-1):1-20.
4
Screening, brief intervention, and referral for alcohol use in adolescents: a systematic review.青少年饮酒的筛查、简短干预和转介:系统评价。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jul;130(1):115-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1589. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
5
The reliability of sensitive information provided by injecting drug users in a clinical setting: clinician-administered versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI).在临床环境中,注射吸毒者提供的敏感信息的可靠性:临床医生询问与音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)。
AIDS Care. 2012;24(12):1496-503. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2012.663886. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
6
Drinking frequency as a brief screen for adolescent alcohol problems.饮酒频率可作为青少年酒精问题的简易筛查指标。
Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):205-12. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1828. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
7
Alcohol interventions for trauma patients are not just for adults: justification for brief interventions for the injured adolescent at a pediatric trauma center.针对创伤患者的酒精干预措施并非仅适用于成年人:儿科创伤中心对受伤青少年进行简短干预的理由。
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):202-10. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181df646a.
8
Alcohol use by youth and adolescents: a pediatric concern.青少年饮酒问题:儿科关注焦点。
Pediatrics. 2010 May;125(5):1078-87. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0438. Epub 2010 Apr 12.
9
Does modality of survey administration impact data quality: audio computer assisted self interview (ACASI) versus self-administered pen and paper?调查管理方式是否会影响数据质量:音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)与自填笔纸?
PLoS One. 2010 Jan 15;5(1):e8728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008728.
10
Alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs: future directions for screening and intervention in the emergency department.酒精、烟草和其他药物:急诊科筛查和干预的未来方向。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;16(11):1078-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00552.x.

一项简短青少年酒精筛查验证研究的方法学与人口统计学

Methodology and Demographics of a Brief Adolescent Alcohol Screen Validation Study.

作者信息

Bromberg Julie R, Spirito Anthony, Chun Thomas, Mello Michael J, Casper T Charles, Ahmad Fahd, Bajaj Lalit, Brown Kathleen M, Chernick Lauren S, Cohen Daniel M, Fein Joel, Horeczko Tim, Levas Michael N, McAninch Brett, Monuteaux Michael, Mull Colette C, Grupp-Phelan Jackie, Powell Elizabeth C, Rogers Alexander, Shenoi Rohit P, Suffoletto Brian, Vance Cheryl, Linakis James G

机构信息

From the Rhode Island Hospital.

The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Nov;35(11):737-744. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001221.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001221
PMID:29112110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5752626/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) 2-question alcohol screen within 16 Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network pediatric emergency departments. This article describes the study methodology, sample characteristics, and baseline outcomes of the NIAAA 2-question screen.

METHODS

Participants included 12- to 17-year-olds treated in one of the participating pediatric emergency departments across the United States. After enrollment, a criterion assessment battery including the NIAAA 2-question screen and other measures of alcohol, drug use, and risk behavior was self-administered by participants on a tablet computer. Two subsamples were derived from the sample. The first subsample was readministered the NIAAA 2-question screen 1 week after their initial visit to assess test-retest reliability. The second subsample is being reassessed at 12 and 24 months to examine predictive validity of the NIAAA 2-question screen.

RESULTS

There were 4834 participants enrolled into the study who completed baseline assessments. Participants were equally distributed across sex and age. Forty-six percent of the participants identified as white, and 26% identified as black. Approximately one quarter identified as Hispanic. Using the NIAAA 2-question screen algorithm, approximately 8% were classified as low risk, 12% were classified as moderate risk, and 4% were classified as highest risk. Alcohol use was less likely to be reported by black participants, non-Hispanic participants, and those younger than 16 years.

DISCUSSION

This study successfully recruited a large, demographically diverse sample to establish rates of the NIAAA screen risk categories across age, sex, ethnicity, and race within pediatric emergency departments.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定美国国立酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所(NIAAA)的两问题酒精筛查量表在16个儿科急诊护理应用研究网络儿科急诊科中的心理测量特性。本文描述了NIAAA两问题筛查量表的研究方法、样本特征和基线结果。

方法

参与者为在美国各参与研究的儿科急诊科接受治疗的12至17岁青少年。入组后,参与者在平板电脑上自行完成一套标准评估量表,其中包括NIAAA两问题筛查量表以及其他关于酒精、药物使用和风险行为的测量。从样本中衍生出两个子样本。第一个子样本在首次就诊1周后再次接受NIAAA两问题筛查量表测试,以评估重测信度。第二个子样本在12个月和24个月时重新评估,以检验NIAAA两问题筛查量表的预测效度。

结果

共有4834名参与者入组并完成了基线评估。参与者在性别和年龄上分布均匀。46%的参与者为白人,26%为黑人。约四分之一的参与者为西班牙裔。使用NIAAA两问题筛查量表算法,约8%被归类为低风险,12%为中度风险,4%为高风险。黑人参与者、非西班牙裔参与者以及16岁以下的参与者报告饮酒的可能性较小。

讨论

本研究成功招募了一个规模大、人口统计学特征多样的样本,以确定儿科急诊科中NIAAA筛查量表风险类别在年龄、性别、族裔和种族方面的比例。