• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为治愈而发推:美国3个肿瘤学专业学会的推特使用情况快照

Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies.

作者信息

Jhawar Sachin R, Prabhu Vinay, Katz Matthew S, Motwani Sabin B

机构信息

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jun 13;2(3):270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.06.003. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2017.06.003
PMID:29114591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5605321/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Medical societies are incorporating Twitter to communicate with their members and connect with patients. This study compares the online presence of 3 major oncologic societies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All available tweets in 2014 by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) were collected. We analyzed whether posts were original content or retweets. The monthly tweet rate was followed to assess trends. We created 2 new metrics, supporter ratio and tweet density, to correlate online presence and engagement with offline membership breadth. The supporter ratio is the number of people following the organization divided by the number of registered members of each society. The tweet density is the total number of posts divided by the number of registered members of each society.

RESULTS

In February 2015, ASCO, ASTRO, and SSO had 36,385; 10,899; and 2721 members, respectively. ASCO's Twitter handle had 33,974 followers, with a supporter ratio of 0.93. A total of 2563 original tweets and 1416 retweets were estimated, which represents a tweet density of 0.11. @ASTRO_org had 5445 followers and a supporter ratio of 0.50. In 2014, ASTRO posted 415 original content tweets and 9 retweets, with a tweet density of 0.039. SSO had a supporter ratio of 0.91 on the basis of 2481 followers. In 2014, SSO posted 207 original tweets and 190 retweets, with a tweet density of 0.15. An increase in tweets and retweets was seen during the month of each society's annual meeting. ASTRO's 61% increase in September 2014 was smaller than SSO's 462% and ASCO's 84%.

CONCLUSION

ASTRO's use of Twitter lags behind ASCO and SSO. Although all 3 societies show increased Twitter use during their annual meetings, they should work toward more meaningful engagement throughout the year. The new metrics of tweet density and supporter ratio will serve as benchmarks for member engagement in future studies.

摘要

目的

医学协会正在利用推特与会员进行沟通并与患者建立联系。本研究比较了3个主要肿瘤学协会在网络上的活跃度。

方法和材料

收集了美国放射肿瘤学会(ASTRO)、美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和外科肿瘤学会(SSO)在2014年发布的所有可用推文。我们分析了推文是原创内容还是转发内容。跟踪每月的推文发布率以评估趋势。我们创建了两个新指标,支持者比率和推文密度,以关联网络活跃度和参与度与线下会员规模。支持者比率是关注该组织的人数除以每个协会的注册会员人数。推文密度是发布的推文总数除以每个协会的注册会员人数。

结果

2015年2月,ASCO、ASTRO和SSO的会员人数分别为36385人、10899人和2721人。ASCO的推特账号有33974名关注者,支持者比率为0.93。估计共有2563条原创推文和1416条转发推文,推文密度为0.11。@ASTRO_org有5445名关注者,支持者比率为0.50。2014年,ASTRO发布了415条原创内容推文和9条转发推文,推文密度为0.039。基于2481名关注者,SSO的支持者比率为0.91。2014年,SSO发布了207条原创推文和190条转发推文,推文密度为0.15。在每个协会年会召开的当月,推文和转发推文数量都有所增加。2014年9月ASTRO增加了61%,低于SSO的462%和ASCO的84%。

结论

ASTRO在推特的使用方面落后于ASCO和SSO。尽管这3个协会在年会期间推特使用量都有所增加,但它们应努力在全年实现更有意义的互动。推文密度和支持者比率这两个新指标将作为未来研究中会员参与度的基准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/3949e1b821c3/adro109-fig-0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/18656a6d61e1/adro109-fig-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/2d782a655b15/adro109-fig-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/ceae5fe0361f/adro109-fig-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/3949e1b821c3/adro109-fig-0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/18656a6d61e1/adro109-fig-0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/2d782a655b15/adro109-fig-0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/ceae5fe0361f/adro109-fig-0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d72/5605321/3949e1b821c3/adro109-fig-0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Tweet for the cure: A snapshot of Twitter usage by 3 U.S. oncologic professional societies.为治愈而发推:美国3个肿瘤学专业学会的推特使用情况快照
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jun 13;2(3):270-276. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.06.003. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
2
Relationship Between Official Twitter Ambassadors and the Number of Retweets in the Annual Congress - "Tweet the Meeting".官方推特大使与年度大会“转发会议”中转发量的关系
Circ Rep. 2021 Jun 30;3(7):414-418. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0063. eCollection 2021 Jul 9.
3
Examining Tweet Content and Engagement of Canadian Public Health Agencies and Decision Makers During COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis.研究 COVID-19 期间加拿大公共卫生机构和决策者的推文内容和参与度:混合方法分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 11;23(3):e24883. doi: 10.2196/24883.
4
Understanding the Composition of a Successful Tweet in Urology.理解泌尿外科成功推特点的构成要素。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 May 15;6(3):450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.008. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
5
Impact of Tweet Content on the Number of Retweets - "Tweet the Meeting 2022".推文内容对转发量的影响——“2022年会议推文”
Circ Rep. 2023 Jun 6;5(7):306-310. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0043. eCollection 2023 Jul 10.
6
Analysis of Twitter Activity and Engagement From Annual Meetings of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society of Interventional Radiology.分析血管外科学会和介入放射学会年会的推特活动和参与度。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
7
Educational content and the use of social media at US departments of surgery.美国外科学系的教育内容和社交媒体的使用。
Surgery. 2018 Feb;163(2):467-471. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.039. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
8
What's trending? Reach and content of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine on social media.热门话题有哪些?社交媒体上母胎医学会的关注范围和内容。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Nov;5(11):101159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101159. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
9
General Surgery Twitter during COVID-19: Tweets, Trends, and Implications for Recruitment Strategies.新冠疫情期间普通外科领域的推特:推文、趋势以及对招聘策略的启示。
Am Surg. 2023 May;89(5):1504-1511. doi: 10.1177/00031348211060414. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
10
Tweeting the Meeting: Twitter Use at The American Society of Breast Surgeons Annual Meeting 2013-2016.会议推文:2013 - 2016年美国乳腺外科医生学会年会上的推特使用情况
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3418-22. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5406-x. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Reflections From the Annals of Surgical Oncology Social Media Committee: The Impact of Promoting Surgical Science Online.外科肿瘤学年鉴社交媒体委员会的思考:在线推广外科学术的影响
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):656-664. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16420-4. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
2
Characterizing Twitter Influencers in Radiation Oncology.辐射肿瘤学领域推特影响者的特征分析
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 23;7(6):100919. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100919. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
3
Current Social Media Use Among Radiation Oncology Trainees.

本文引用的文献

1
Disease-Specific Hashtags for Online Communication About Cancer Care.用于癌症护理在线交流的特定疾病主题标签。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Mar;2(3):392-4. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3960.
2
Enriched Audience Engagement Through Twitter: Should More Academic Radiology Departments Seize the Opportunity?通过推特增强受众参与度:更多放射学学术部门是否应抓住这一机遇?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jul;12(7):756-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 May 13.
3
The impact of social media on readership of a peer-reviewed medical journal.社交媒体对同行评审医学期刊读者群的影响。
放射肿瘤学实习生当前使用社交媒体的情况。
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Dec 23;6(2):100642. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.100642. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Nov;11(11):1038-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
4
Multicultural media outreach: increasing cancer information coverage in minority communities.多元文化媒体宣传:增加少数族裔社区的癌症信息覆盖率。
J Cancer Educ. 2013 Dec;28(4):744-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0534-5.
5
Use of twitter among local health departments: an analysis of information sharing, engagement, and action.地方卫生部门对推特的使用:信息共享、参与度及行动分析
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 19;15(8):e177. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2775.
6
Can I get a retweet please? Health research recruitment and the Twittersphere.请转发一下好吗?健康研究招募和推特圈。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Mar;70(3):599-609. doi: 10.1111/jan.12222. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
7
Analyzing health organizations' use of Twitter for promoting health literacy.分析健康组织利用 Twitter 提高健康素养。
J Health Commun. 2013;18(4):410-25. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.727956. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
8
Plastic surgery marketing in a generation of "tweeting".社交媒体时代的整形营销
Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Nov;31(8):972-6. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11423764.
9
Social networks lack useful content for incontinence.社交网络缺乏有用的尿失禁内容。
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):764-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.074. Epub 2011 Aug 20.
10
'What's happening?' A content analysis of concussion-related traffic on Twitter.'发生了什么?' 对 Twitter 上与脑震荡相关的交通内容的分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 Mar;46(4):258-63. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080341. Epub 2011 Mar 15.