Goff Peter H, Harrison Louis B, Furhang Eli, Ng Evan, Bhatia Stephen, Trichter Frieda, Ennis Ronald D
Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 4;2(3):420-428. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.001. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
The hypothesis is that 2-dimensional kV orthogonal imaging with fiducial markers (kV-FM) and soft-tissue cone beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT) are equally reproducible for daily positional alignments for image guided (IG) intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.
Ten patients undergoing definitive treatment for prostate cancer with IG-IMRT were imaged daily with kV-FM and ST-CBCT. For each acquired kV and CBCT image, offline alignments to the digitally reconstructed radiograph or planning CT, respectively, were made twice by the same physician to assess intraobserver test-retest reproducibility. The 256 kV and 142 CBCT images were analyzed, and the test-retest analysis was performed again on a subset of images by another physician to verify the results.
The results demonstrated that kV-FM had better intraobserver test-retest reproducibility in the anterior-posterior (AP; 95% confidence interval [CI] Pearson correlation coefficient [r], 0.987-0.991), left-right (LR; 95% CI r, 0.955-0.969), and superior-inferior (SI; 95% CI r, 0.971-0.980) directions for daily IG alignments compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 95% CI r, 0.804-0.877; LR: 95% CI r, 0.877-0.924; SI: 95% CI r, 0.791-0.869). Errors associated with intraobserver test-retest reproducibility were submillimeter with kV-FM (AP: 0.4 ± 0.7 mm; RL: 0.4 ± 1.0 mm; SI: 0.5 ± 0.7 mm) compared with ST-CBCT (AP: 2.1 ± 2.2 mm; LR: 1.3 ± 1.4 mm; SI: 1.2 ± 1.8 mm). The mean shift differences between kV-FM and ST-CBCT were 0.3 ± 3.8 mm for AP, -1.1 ± 8.5 mm for LR, and -2.0 ± 3.7 mm for SI. Dose-volume histograms were generated and showed that test-retest variability associated with ST-CBCT IG-alignments resulted in significantly increased dose to normal structures and a reduced planning target volume dose in many patients.
The kV-FM-based daily IG alignment for IMRT of prostate cancer is more precise than ST-CBCT, as assessed by a physician's ability to reproducibly align images. Given the magnitude of the error introduced by inconsistency in making ST-CBCT alignments, these data support a role for daily kV imaging of FM to enhance the precision of external beam dose delivery to the prostate.
本研究的假设是,对于前列腺癌图像引导(IG)调强放射治疗(IMRT)的每日体位校正,二维千伏(kV)正交标记成像(kV-FM)和软组织锥形束计算机断层扫描(ST-CBCT)具有同等的可重复性。
10例接受IG-IMRT根治性治疗的前列腺癌患者每天接受kV-FM和ST-CBCT成像。对于每次采集的kV和CBCT图像,由同一位医生分别对数字重建射线照片或计划CT进行两次离线配准,以评估观察者内重测的可重复性。分析了256幅kV图像和142幅CBCT图像,并由另一位医生对一部分图像再次进行重测分析以验证结果。
结果表明,与ST-CBCT相比,在每日IG校正的前后(AP;95%置信区间[CI]皮尔逊相关系数[r],0.987 - 0.991)、左右(LR;95%CI r,0.955 - 0.969)和上下(SI;95%CI r,0.971 - 0.980)方向上,kV-FM具有更好的观察者内重测可重复性(AP:95%CI r,0.804 - 0.877;LR:95%CI r,0.877 - 0.924;SI:95%CI r,0.791 - 0.869)。与kV-FM相比,观察者内重测可重复性相关的误差在亚毫米级别(AP:0.4±0.7 mm;RL:0.4±1.0 mm;SI:0.5±0.7 mm),而ST-CBCT的误差为(AP:2.1±2.2 mm;LR:1.3±1.4 mm;SI:1.2±1.8 mm)。kV-FM和ST-CBCT之间的平均位移差异在AP方向为0.3±3.8 mm,LR方向为 -1.1±8. mm,SI方向为 -2.0±3.7 mm。生成了剂量体积直方图,结果显示与ST-CBCT IG校正相关的重测变异性导致许多患者正常结构的剂量显著增加,计划靶体积剂量降低。
根据医生对图像进行可重复配准的能力评估,基于kV-FM的前列腺癌IMRT每日IG校正比ST-CBCT更精确。鉴于ST-CBCT配准不一致所引入的误差大小,这些数据支持每日kV-FM成像在提高前列腺外照射剂量递送精度方面的作用。