Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Turning Point, Eastern Health, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia.
Addict Biol. 2019 Jan;24(1):145-153. doi: 10.1111/adb.12575. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
High impulsivity and poor executive function are characteristic of methamphetamine use disorder. High arousal in the impulsive system has been proposed to compromise the executive system's regulating ability (i.e. the dual-systems model). While interaction between these variables may partly explain poor treatment outcomes associated with methamphetamine use disorder, previous research has tended to examine each factor separately. We investigated whether high impulsivity (measured with an impulsive choice task) and poor executive function (measured with a working memory task) predict methamphetamine use (determined by hair sample) in the 6 weeks following treatment commencement. We also investigated whether impulsive choice moderates the relationship between working memory and methamphetamine use. One hundred and eight individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (75 percent male) were tested within 3 weeks of commencing treatment; 80 (74 percent) were followed up 6 weeks following baseline testing. Cognitive measures significantly predicted drug use after controlling for nuisance variables. Working memory was a significant predictor, while impulsive choice was not. The interaction model included working memory as a predictor and impulsive choice as a moderator. This model was significant, as was the interaction term. Working memory significantly predicted levels of methamphetamine use in early treatment, and impulsive choice moderated this relationship. Those with working memory deficits are particularly vulnerable to using greater amounts of methamphetamine. As working memory increased methamphetamine use decreased among individuals with low/medium delay discounting. Pre-treatment cognitive testing may identify patients at high risk, while remediation of working memory function may be a treatment target for reducing methamphetamine use.
高冲动性和执行功能差是甲基苯丙胺使用障碍的特征。冲动系统的高唤醒被认为会损害执行系统的调节能力(即双系统模型)。虽然这些变量之间的相互作用可能部分解释了与甲基苯丙胺使用障碍相关的治疗效果不佳,但之前的研究往往分别检查每个因素。我们调查了高冲动性(用冲动选择任务测量)和执行功能差(用工作记忆任务测量)是否在治疗开始后 6 周内预测甲基苯丙胺的使用(通过头发样本确定)。我们还调查了冲动选择是否调节工作记忆与甲基苯丙胺使用之间的关系。108 名甲基苯丙胺使用障碍患者(75%为男性)在治疗开始后 3 周内接受测试;80 名(74%)在基线测试后 6 周进行了随访。在控制了干扰变量后,认知测量显著预测了药物使用。工作记忆是一个显著的预测因素,而冲动选择不是。交互模型将工作记忆作为预测因子,冲动选择作为调节因子。该模型具有统计学意义,交互项也是如此。工作记忆显著预测了早期治疗中甲基苯丙胺的使用水平,而冲动选择调节了这种关系。那些工作记忆有缺陷的人特别容易使用更多的甲基苯丙胺。随着工作记忆的增加,具有低/中延迟折扣的个体使用的甲基苯丙胺减少。治疗前的认知测试可以识别出高风险的患者,而工作记忆功能的矫正可能是减少甲基苯丙胺使用的治疗目标。