Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2021;157:371-407. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
Cognitive deficits are highly comorbid with substance use disorders. Deficits span multiple cognitive domains, are associated with disease severity across substance classes, and persist long after cessation of substance use. Furthermore, recovery of cognitive function during protracted abstinence is highly predictive of treatment adherence, relapse, and overall substance use disorder prognosis, suggesting that addiction may be best characterized as a disease of executive dysfunction. While the association between cognitive deficits and substance use disorders is clear, determining causalities is made difficult by the complex interplay between these variables. Cognitive dysfunction present prior to first drug use can act as a risk factor for substance use initiation, likelihood of pathology, and disease trajectory. At the same time, substance use can directly cause cognitive impairments even in individuals without preexisting deficits. Thus, parsing preexisting risk factors from substance-induced adaptations, and how they may interact, poses significant challenges. Here, focusing on psychostimulants and alcohol, we review evidence from clinical literature implicating cognitive deficits as a risk factor for addiction, a consequence of substance use, and the role the prefrontal cortex plays in these phenomena. We then review corresponding preclinical literature, highlighting the high degree of congruency between animal and human studies, and emphasize the unique opportunity that animal models provide to test causality between cognitive phenotypes and substance use, and to investigate the underlying neurobiology at a cellular and molecular level. Together, we provide an accessible resource for assessing the validity and utility of forward- and reverse-translation between these clinical and preclinical literatures.
认知缺陷与物质使用障碍高度共病。缺陷跨越多个认知领域,与物质类别中的疾病严重程度相关,并在物质使用停止后长期存在。此外,在长时间禁欲期间认知功能的恢复高度预测治疗依从性、复发和整体物质使用障碍预后,这表明成瘾可能最好被描述为执行功能障碍的疾病。虽然认知缺陷与物质使用障碍之间的关联是明确的,但由于这些变量之间的复杂相互作用,确定因果关系变得困难。在首次使用药物之前出现的认知功能障碍可以作为物质使用开始、病理发生的可能性和疾病轨迹的风险因素。同时,即使在没有先前缺陷的个体中,物质使用也可以直接导致认知障碍。因此,从物质引起的适应中解析先前存在的风险因素以及它们如何相互作用,带来了重大挑战。在这里,我们重点关注精神兴奋剂和酒精,综述临床文献中的证据表明认知缺陷是成瘾的风险因素,是物质使用的后果,以及前额叶皮层在这些现象中的作用。然后,我们回顾相应的临床前文献,强调动物和人类研究之间高度一致性,并强调动物模型在测试认知表型与物质使用之间的因果关系以及在细胞和分子水平上研究潜在神经生物学方面提供的独特机会。总之,我们为评估这些临床和临床前文献之间的正向和逆向翻译的有效性和实用性提供了一个易于访问的资源。