• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将年龄纳入国际生殖细胞共识分类(IGCCC):是时候向前迈进了吗?

Incorporating age into International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC): a time to move forward?

作者信息

Abdel-Rahman Omar

机构信息

a Clinical Oncology department, Faculty of Medicine , Ain Shams University , Cairo , Egypt.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jan;18(1):101-105. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1403321. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1080/14737140.2018.1403321
PMID:29115166
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older age is a poor prognostic indicator among patients with germ cell tumors. The current study evaluates an age-integrated international germ cell consensus classification (IGCCC) for advanced germ cell tumors.

METHODS

SEER database (2004-2014) was accessed through SEER*Stat program and both IGCCC and age-integrated IGCCC were calculated based on site of the primary, site of the metastasis and level of tumor markers. Overall survival analyses according to IGCCC and age-integrated IGCCC were conducted through Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Overall survival was compared according to IGCCC and age-integrated IGCCC for patients with seminoma and Non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). P values were significant (P <0.001) for all scenarios. c-index for seminoma for IGCCC was 0.553; c-index for seminoma for age-integrated IGCCC was 0.664;c-index for NSGCTs for IGCCC was 0.729; and c-index for NSGCTs for age-integrated IGCCC was 0.738. A Cox-regression multivariate model of factors affecting cancer-specific survival (adjusted for race and surgical treatment) was conducted. All P values for pair wise comparisons (among different age-integrated IGCCC categories) were significant for both seminoma and NSGCTs (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared to traditional IGCCC, age-integrated IGCCC is more discriminatory and the new risk groups introduced within it are prognostically relevant.

摘要

背景

在生殖细胞肿瘤患者中,年龄是一个预后不良的指标。本研究评估了一种针对晚期生殖细胞肿瘤的年龄整合国际生殖细胞共识分类(IGCCC)。

方法

通过SEER*Stat程序访问SEER数据库(2004 - 2014年),并根据原发部位、转移部位和肿瘤标志物水平计算IGCCC和年龄整合IGCCC。通过Kaplan-Meier分析对根据IGCCC和年龄整合IGCCC的总生存进行分析。

结果

对精原细胞瘤和非精原细胞性生殖细胞肿瘤(NSGCTs)患者,根据IGCCC和年龄整合IGCCC比较总生存。所有情况的P值均具有显著性(P <0.001)。IGCCC精原细胞瘤的c指数为0.553;年龄整合IGCCC精原细胞瘤的c指数为0.664;IGCCC NSGCTs的c指数为0.729;年龄整合IGCCC NSGCTs的c指数为0.738。进行了影响癌症特异性生存的因素的Cox回归多变量模型(根据种族和手术治疗进行调整)。精原细胞瘤和NSGCTs在不同年龄整合IGCCC类别之间的两两比较的所有P值均具有显著性(P<0.01)。

结论

与传统的IGCCC相比,年龄整合IGCCC具有更强的区分能力,其中引入的新风险组具有预后相关性。

相似文献

1
Incorporating age into International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC): a time to move forward?将年龄纳入国际生殖细胞共识分类(IGCCC):是时候向前迈进了吗?
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018 Jan;18(1):101-105. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1403321. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
2
Contemporary North-American population-based validation of the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification for metastatic germ cell tumors of the testis.当代北美基于人群的睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤转移的国际生殖细胞共识分类的验证。
World J Urol. 2020 Jun;38(6):1535-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02927-z. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
3
Application of the adult international germ cell classification system to pediatric malignant non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.成人国际生殖细胞分类系统在儿童恶性非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤中的应用:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2008 Apr;50(4):746-51. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21304.
4
Clinical prognostic markers of non-seminomatous germ cell tumours: an insight from Swedish Family-Cancer Database.非精原细胞瘤性生殖细胞肿瘤的临床预后标志物:来自瑞典家庭癌症数据库的见解
Urology. 2010 Nov;76(5):1269-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.08.008.
5
Combined seminoma/non-seminoma should be considered as intermediate grade germ cell cancer (GCC).精原细胞瘤/非精原细胞瘤混合性肿瘤应被视为中级生殖细胞癌(GCC)。
Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(9):1392-4. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00021-a.
6
[Testicular germ cell tumors: Histopathological and molecular features].[睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤:组织病理学和分子特征]
Bull Cancer. 2019 Apr;106(4):328-341. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Low RBM3 protein expression correlates with clinical stage, prognostic classification and increased risk of treatment failure in testicular non-seminomatous germ cell cancer.低RBM3蛋白表达与睾丸非精原细胞性生殖细胞癌的临床分期、预后分类及治疗失败风险增加相关。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0121300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121300. eCollection 2015.
8
[Classification of germ cell tumors of the testis].[睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤的分类]
Rev Prat. 2007 Feb 28;57(4):375-8.
9
Survival of metastatic germ cell cancer patients assessed by international germ cell consensus classification in Japan.在日本,通过国际生殖细胞癌共识分类评估的转移性生殖细胞癌患者的生存率。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr;38(4):281-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn009. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
10
A new prognostic model for testicular germ cell tumours.一种用于睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤的新预后模型。
APMIS. 2003 Jan;111(1):100-5; discussion 105. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2003.1110114_1.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival of nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in pediatric patients and young adults - A stage group stratified analysis.儿童和青年患者非精原细胞瘤生殖细胞肿瘤的生存情况——基于分期分组的分析。
Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;40(4):169.e1-169.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.12.012. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Incorporating non-biological factors into the TNM staging system for better prognostication and decision-making in testicular cancer.将非生物学因素纳入 TNM 分期系统,以更好地预测和决策睾丸癌。
World J Urol. 2019 Oct;37(10):2165-2173. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2603-1. Epub 2018 Dec 15.
3
Testicular Germ-Cell Tumours: A Descriptive Analysis of Clinical Characteristics at First Presentation.
睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤:首次就诊时临床特征的描述性分析
Urol Int. 2018;100(4):409-419. doi: 10.1159/000488284. Epub 2018 Apr 12.