Kwan Janice L, Singh Hardeep
Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, 427-600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada.
Houston Veterans Affairs Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Section of Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2017 Sep;4(3):173-177. doi: 10.1515/dx-2017-0019. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
Failure to follow-up on test results represents a serious breakdown point in the diagnostic process which can lead to missed or delayed diagnoses and patient harm. Amidst discussions to ensure fail-safe test result follow-up, an important, yet under-discussed question emerges: how do we determine who is ultimately responsible for initiating follow-up action on the tests that are ordered? This seemingly simple question belies its true complexity. Although many of these complexities are also applicable to other diagnostic specialities, the field of medical imaging provides an ideal context to discuss the challenges of attributing responsibility of test result follow-up. In this review, we summarize several key concepts and challenges in the context of critical results, wet reads, and incidental findings to stimulate further discussion on responsibility issues in radiology. These discussions could help establish reliable closed-loop communication to ensure that every test result is sent, received, acknowledged and acted upon without failure.
未能跟进检查结果是诊断过程中的一个严重故障点,可能导致漏诊或延误诊断并对患者造成伤害。在确保对检查结果进行万无一失的跟进的讨论中,一个重要但讨论不足的问题出现了:我们如何确定谁最终负责对所开检查项目启动跟进行动?这个看似简单的问题掩盖了其真正的复杂性。尽管其中许多复杂性也适用于其他诊断专业,但医学影像领域为讨论检查结果跟进责任归属的挑战提供了一个理想的背景。在本综述中,我们在危急结果、湿读和偶然发现的背景下总结了几个关键概念和挑战,以激发关于放射学中责任问题的进一步讨论。这些讨论有助于建立可靠的闭环沟通,以确保每个检查结果都能成功发送、接收、确认并得到处理。