Suppr超能文献

未对检查结果进行随访对患者预后的影响。我们如何能做得更好?

The Impact for Patient Outcomes of Failure to Follow Up on Test Results. How Can We Do Better?

作者信息

Callen Joanne, Georgiou Andrew, Li Julie, Westbrook Johanna I

机构信息

Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University , Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

EJIFCC. 2015 Jan 27;26(1):38-46. eCollection 2015 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization-World Alliance for Patient Safety has identified test result management as a priority area. Poor test result follow-up can have major consequences for the quality of care, including missed diagnoses and suboptimal patient outcomes. Over the last three decades there has been considerable growth in the number of requests for pathology and radiology services which has added to the complexity of how patient care is delivered and test results are managed. This can contribute to a lack of clarity about where and with whom responsibility for test follow-up should reside: a problem that is compounded by a lack of clear definitions about what are critical, unexpected or significantly abnormal results.

AIM OF THIS PAPER

This paper will present a narrative review highlighting key issues related to the problem of failure to follow up laboratory test results, and outline potential solutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Information technology (IT) has the potential to enhance the performance and safety of test result management processes. Effective solutions must engage all stakeholders, including consumers, in arriving at decisions about who needs to receive results, how and when they are communicated, and how they are acknowledged and acted upon and the documentation of these actions.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织 - 世界患者安全联盟已将检验结果管理确定为一个优先领域。检验结果随访不佳可能对医疗质量产生重大影响,包括漏诊和患者预后不理想。在过去三十年中,病理学和放射学服务的申请数量大幅增长,这增加了患者护理提供方式和检验结果管理的复杂性。这可能导致对于检验随访责任应由谁承担以及在何处承担缺乏明确性:由于对什么是关键、意外或显著异常结果缺乏明确定义,这个问题变得更加复杂。

本文目的

本文将进行叙述性综述,突出与未跟进实验室检验结果问题相关的关键问题,并概述潜在解决方案。

结论

信息技术(IT)有潜力提高检验结果管理流程的性能和安全性。有效的解决方案必须让所有利益相关者,包括消费者,参与到关于谁需要接收结果、如何以及何时传达结果、如何确认和处理结果以及记录这些行动的决策中来。

相似文献

2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
7
Assigning responsibility to close the loop on radiology test results.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2017 Sep;4(3):173-177. doi: 10.1515/dx-2017-0019. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Failure to review STAT clinical laboratory requests and its economical impact.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2016;26(1):61-7. doi: 10.11613/BM.2016.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical values notification: A nationwide survey of practices among clinical laboratories across Nigeria.
Afr J Lab Med. 2023 Dec 15;12(1):2249. doi: 10.4102/ajlm.v12i1.2249. eCollection 2023.
2
Endorsing: closing the loop on diagnostic tests in electronic health care records.
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jan;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002042.
3
Critical Test Result Recall Supporting System (CTR RSS) Improves Follow-Up among Patients in the Community.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 18;12(5):1252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051252.
4
Medication Risk Management.
Innov Pharm. 2019 Aug 31;10(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v10i1.1647. eCollection 2019.
5
Engaging patients and families in pediatric radiology.
Pediatr Radiol. 2020 Oct;50(11):1492-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04742-w. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Contributing Factors for Pediatric Ambulatory Diagnostic Process Errors: Project RedDE.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2020 May 12;5(3):e299. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000299. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
7
Project RedDE: Cluster Randomized Trial to Reduce Missed or Delayed Abnormal Laboratory Value Actions.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019 Sep 30;4(5):e218. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000218. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
8
The Impact of Automated Notification on Follow-up of Actionable Tests Pending at Discharge: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jul;33(7):1043-1051. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4393-y. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

2
Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives.
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun;98(6):788-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
4
Lessons learned from the introduction of an electronic safety net to enhance test result management in an Australian mothers' hospital.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1104-8. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002466. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
5
An initiative to improve the management of clinically significant test results in a large health care network.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Nov;39(11):517-27. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39068-0.
6
Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes: a systematic review.
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):677-87. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00006.
7
Harmonization of critical result management in laboratory medicine.
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 May 15;432:135-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
8
Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug;21(4):737-41. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002239. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
10
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):727-35. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267. Epub 2012 Dec 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验