• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧囊实性附件囊肿乳头状突起的超声特征差异:一项回顾性国际多中心研究。

Differences in ultrasound features of papillations in unilocular-solid adnexal cysts: a retrospective international multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;52(2):269-278. doi: 10.1002/uog.18951.

DOI:10.1002/uog.18951
PMID:29119698
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify ultrasound features of papillations or of the cyst wall that can discriminate between benign and malignant unilocular-solid cysts with papillations but no other solid components.

METHODS

From the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) database derived from seven ultrasound centers, we identified patients with an adnexal lesion described at ultrasonography as unilocular-solid with papillations but no other solid components. All patients had undergone transvaginal ultrasound between 1999 and 2007 or 2009 and 2012, by an experienced examiner following the IOTA research protocol. Information on four ultrasound features of papillations had been collected prospectively. Information on a further seven ultrasound features was collected retrospectively from electronic or paper ultrasound images of good quality. The histological diagnosis of the surgically removed adnexal lesion was considered the gold standard.

RESULTS

Of 204 masses included, 131 (64.2%) were benign, 42 (20.6%) were borderline tumors, 30 (14.7%) were primary invasive tumors and one (0.5%) was a metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the following ultrasound features to be associated independently with malignancy: height of the largest papillation, presence of blood flow in papillations, papillation confluence or dissemination, and shadows behind papillations. Shadows decreased the odds of malignancy, while the other features increased them.

CONCLUSION

We have identified ultrasound features that can help to discriminate between benign and malignant unilocular-solid cysts with papillations but no other solid components. Our results need to be confirmed in prospective studies. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

确定乳头状突起或囊肿壁的超声特征,以区分具有乳头状突起但无其他实性成分的良性和恶性单房性实性囊肿。

方法

我们从七个超声中心的国际卵巢肿瘤分析(IOTA)数据库中,确定了在超声检查中描述为具有乳头状突起的单房性实性但无其他实性成分的附件病变患者。所有患者均在 1999 年至 2007 年或 2009 年至 2012 年期间,由经验丰富的检查者按照 IOTA 研究方案进行了经阴道超声检查。前瞻性收集了关于乳头状突起的四个超声特征的信息。从质量较好的电子或纸质超声图像中回顾性收集了另外七个超声特征的信息。手术切除的附件病变的组织学诊断被认为是金标准。

结果

204 个肿块中,131 个(64.2%)为良性,42 个(20.6%)为交界性肿瘤,30 个(14.7%)为原发性浸润性肿瘤,1 个(0.5%)为转移瘤。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,以下超声特征与恶性肿瘤独立相关:最大乳头状突起的高度、乳头状突起内血流的存在、乳头状突起融合或播散、乳头状突起后的阴影。阴影降低了恶性肿瘤的可能性,而其他特征则增加了这种可能性。

结论

我们已经确定了一些超声特征,可以帮助区分具有乳头状突起但无其他实性成分的良性和恶性单房性实性囊肿。我们的结果需要在前瞻性研究中得到证实。版权所有 © 2017 ISUOG。由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 出版。

相似文献

1
Differences in ultrasound features of papillations in unilocular-solid adnexal cysts: a retrospective international multicenter study.单侧囊实性附件囊肿乳头状突起的超声特征差异:一项回顾性国际多中心研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;52(2):269-278. doi: 10.1002/uog.18951.
2
Clinical and ultrasound characteristics of surgically removed adnexal lesions with largest diameter ≤ 2.5 cm: a pictorial essay.最大直径≤2.5cm 附件病变的临床和超声特征:图像研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):648-656. doi: 10.1002/uog.17392.
3
Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?单纯性附件囊肿伴乳头状突起但无其他实性成分:是否存在一种术前可靠的诊断方法,能将其明确地分为良性或恶性?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;41(5):570-81. doi: 10.1002/uog.12294. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
4
Imaging in gynecological disease (16): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous cystadenofibromas in adnexa.妇科疾病影像学(十六):附件浆液性囊腺瘤纤维瘤的临床及超声特征。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;54(6):823-830. doi: 10.1002/uog.20277.
5
Ovarian masses with papillary projections diagnosed and removed during pregnancy: ultrasound features and histological diagnosis.孕期诊断并切除的伴有乳头样突起的卵巢肿物:超声特征及组织学诊断
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;50(1):116-123. doi: 10.1002/uog.17216.
6
Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.基于超声的卵巢癌诊断简易规则。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;31(6):681-90. doi: 10.1002/uog.5365.
7
Risk of malignancy in unilocular cysts: a study of 1148 adnexal masses classified as unilocular cysts at transvaginal ultrasound and review of the literature.经阴道超声诊断为单纯性囊肿的 1148 例附件包块的良恶性风险分析:一项研究,并复习文献。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;41(1):80-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12308. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
8
Imaging in gynecological disease (12): clinical and ultrasound features of invasive and non-invasive malignant serous ovarian tumors.妇科疾病影像学(十二):侵袭性和非侵袭性恶性浆液性卵巢肿瘤的临床和超声特征。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):788-799. doi: 10.1002/uog.17414. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Age-related differences in the sonographic characteristics of endometriomas.子宫内膜异位囊肿超声特征的年龄相关差异。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1723-31. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew113. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
10
Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray-scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help.附件肿块使用灰阶和多普勒超声检查结果的主观评估难以明确良恶性:逻辑回归模型无助于诊断。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):456-65. doi: 10.1002/uog.9030. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Ultrasonography Characteristics of Borderline Ovarian Tumor Subtypes.卵巢交界性肿瘤各亚型的超声特征
J Ultrasound Med. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1002/jum.16756.
2
Imaging in gynecological disease (28): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of serous and mucinous cystadenomas in the adnexa.妇科疾病影像学(28):附件浆液性和黏液性囊腺瘤的临床及超声特征
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Aug;66(2):233-241. doi: 10.1002/uog.29248. Epub 2025 May 26.
3
Can the ultrasound microcystic pattern accurately predict borderline ovarian tumors?
超声微囊型能否准确预测卵巢交界性肿瘤?
J Ovarian Res. 2023 Aug 11;16(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01253-8.
4
Ultrasound Features and Ultrasound Scores in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.超声特征及超声评分在附件区良恶性肿块鉴别中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 23;13(13):2152. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132152.
5
Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.基于 O-RADS 的列线图预测具有复杂超声形态的附件包块的恶性风险。
J Ovarian Res. 2023 Mar 21;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01133-1.
6
ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.欧洲妇科肿瘤学会(ESGO)/国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)/国际妇产科联盟肿瘤学组(IOTA)/欧洲妇科内镜学会(ESGE)关于卵巢肿瘤术前诊断的共识声明。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jul;31(7):961-982. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002565. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
7
ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours.ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE关于卵巢肿瘤术前诊断的共识声明。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Jun;13(2):107-130. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.2.016. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Sonographic Assessment of Complex Ultrasound Morphology Adnexal Tumors in Pregnant Women with the Use of IOTA Simple Rules Risk and ADNEX Scoring Systems.应用IOTA简单规则风险和ADNEX评分系统对孕妇附件区复杂超声形态学肿瘤进行超声评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;11(3):414. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030414.