Division for Quantitative Sustainability Assessment (QSA), Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark , 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Division for System Analysis (SYS), Department of Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark , 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 5;51(23):13995-14005. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01780. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
To move toward environmentally sustainable transport systems, electric vehicles (EVs) are increasingly seen as viable alternatives to internal combustion vehicles (ICVs). To ensure effectiveness of such deployment, holistic assessments of environmental impacts can help decision-makers determine optimized urban strategies in a long-term perspective. However, explicit guidance and conduct of such assessments are currently missing. Here, we therefore propose a framework using life cycle assessment that enables the quantification of environmental impacts of a transport system at full urban scale from a fleet-based, foresight perspective. The analysis of the passenger car fleet development in the city of Copenhagen for the years 2016-2030 is used as a proof-of-concept. We modeled and compared five powertrain technologies, and we assessed four fleet-based scenarios for the entire city. Our results showed relative environmental benefits from range-extended and fuel-cell EVs over ICVs and standard EVs. These results were found to be sensitive to local settings, like electricity grid mix, which could alter the relative environmental performances across EV technologies. The comprehensive framework developed here can be applied to other geographic areas and contexts to assess the environmental sustainability of transport systems.
为了向环境可持续的交通系统迈进,电动汽车(EV)正逐渐被视为内燃机汽车(ICV)的可行替代品。为了确保这种部署的有效性,对环境影响的全面评估可以帮助决策者从长远角度确定优化的城市策略。然而,目前缺乏明确的指导和此类评估的开展。在这里,我们因此提出了一个使用生命周期评估的框架,该框架能够从基于车队的前瞻性角度对城市范围内的交通系统的环境影响进行量化。以哥本哈根市 2016-2030 年的乘用车车队发展为例进行概念验证。我们对五种动力总成技术进行了建模和比较,并对整个城市的四个基于车队的情景进行了评估。我们的结果表明,插电式混合动力汽车和燃料电池电动汽车相对于内燃机汽车和标准电动汽车具有相对的环境优势。这些结果对本地设置(如电网组合)很敏感,这可能会改变电动汽车技术之间的相对环境性能。这里开发的综合框架可以应用于其他地理区域和背景,以评估交通系统的环境可持续性。