Suppr超能文献

调查现有重大事故分诊工具分诊不足的影响。

Investigating the effects of under-triage by existing major incident triage tools.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Institute of Naval Medicine, Gosport.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;26(2):139-144. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000513.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Triage is a key principle in the effective management of a major incident. Its effectiveness is a balance between identifying those in need of life-saving intervention, and those triaged incorrectly as either needing/not needing a life-saving intervention. The primary aim of this study was to report mortality in those under-triaged by existing major incident triage tools. Secondary aims were to report the ability of triage tools at identifying serious injury by body region (defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale severity score≥3).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective database analysis of the UK Trauma Audit Research Network for all adult patients (≥18 years) between 2006 and 2014. Patients were defined as priority one using a previously published list. Using the first recorded hospital physiology, patients were categorized by the Modified Physiological Triage Tool (MPTT), National Ambulance Resilience Unit (NARU) Sieve and the Major Incident Medical Management and Support (MIMMS) Triage Sieve. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using a χ-test and Mann-Whitney U-test respectively.

RESULTS

During the study period, 218 985 adult patients met the Trauma Audit Research Network inclusion criteria, with 24 791 (19.5%) priority one patients, of which 70% were male with a median age of 51 (33-71) years and injury severity score of 16 (9-25). The MPTT showed the lowest rate of under-triage (42.4%, P<0.001). Compared with existing methods, the MPTT under-triage population had significantly lower mortality (5.7%, P<0.001) with significantly fewer serious thorax and head injuries under-triaged than both the NARU Sieve and MIMMS Triage Sieve (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study has defined the implications of under-triage in the context of a major trauma population. The MPTT misses fewer severely injured patients, with a significant reduction in mortality. We suggest the MPTT to be considered as an alternative to existing primary major incident triage tools.

摘要

目的

分诊是有效管理重大事件的关键原则。其有效性是在识别需要救生干预的人和分诊错误的人之间的平衡,这些人需要/不需要救生干预。本研究的主要目的是报告现有重大事件分诊工具分诊不足的死亡率。次要目的是报告分诊工具识别身体区域严重损伤的能力(定义为损伤严重程度评分≥3 的简明损伤评分)。

患者和方法

对 2006 年至 2014 年间英国创伤审核研究网络的所有成年患者(≥18 岁)进行回顾性数据库分析。使用先前发表的清单,将患者定义为优先级 1。根据首次记录的医院生理学,使用改良生理分诊工具(MPTT)、国家救护弹性单位(NARU)筛检和重大事件医疗管理和支持(MIMMS)分诊筛检对患者进行分类。使用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼 U 检验分别分析分类和连续数据。

结果

在研究期间,符合创伤审核研究网络纳入标准的 218985 例成年患者中,有 24791 例(19.5%)为优先级 1 患者,其中 70%为男性,中位年龄为 51(33-71)岁,损伤严重程度评分为 16(9-25)。MPTT 显示最低的分诊不足率(42.4%,P<0.001)。与现有方法相比,MPTT 分诊不足人群的死亡率明显较低(5.7%,P<0.001),且严重胸部和头部损伤的分诊不足明显少于 NARU 筛检和 MIMMS 分诊筛检(P<0.001)。

结论

本研究在重大创伤人群的背景下定义了分诊不足的意义。MPTT 漏诊的严重受伤患者较少,死亡率显著降低。我们建议考虑 MPTT 作为现有主要事件分诊工具的替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验