Suppr超能文献

血管外科患者肝素剂量的抗Xa因子与活化部分凝血活酶时间监测比较:一项单中心回顾性研究

Comparison of Antifactor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Monitoring for Heparin Dosing in Vascular Surgery Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Rizk Elsie, Wilson Allison D, Murillo Michelle U, Putney David R

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 2018 Feb;40(1):151-155. doi: 10.1097/FTD.0000000000000463.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vascular surgery patients often require anticoagulation with intravenous unfractionated heparin monitored through antifactor Xa (anti-Xa) levels or the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). This study compares the 2 monitoring strategies in terms of major bleeding events in the vascular surgery population.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective study that included patients treated with a pharmacy-managed heparin protocol monitored by either anti-Xa or aPTT after vascular surgery. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients experiencing major bleeding events after procedure. Secondary outcomes evaluated minor bleeding episodes, postprocedure packed red blood cell transfusions, and the incidence of thrombotic events. In a secondary analysis, simultaneously measured anti-Xa and aPTT values were identified and analyzed for discordance.

RESULTS

Major bleeding occurred in 12/72 patients (17%) on the anti-Xa-monitored protocol versus 5/62 patients (8%) on the aPTT-monitored protocol (P = 0.19). Minor bleeding episodes were documented in 10% of the patients in the anti-Xa group versus 6% in the aPTT group (P = 0.54). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in packed red blood cell transfusions and thrombotic events. Of 109 pairs of simultaneously measured anti-Xa and aPTT values, 39 pairs (36%) showed relatively high aPTT values compared with corresponding anti-Xa levels. Nine patients who had these discordant test results experienced bleeding while their heparin drip was titrated based on lower anti-Xa values.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of anti-Xa levels for heparin titration showed higher rates of major bleeding complications in vascular surgery patients compared with aPTT monitoring, but no significant difference was identified in this study. Vascular surgery patients with relatively high aPTT to anti-Xa values may have an increased risk of bleeding complications when heparin is titrated based on anti-Xa levels.

摘要

背景

血管外科手术患者常需静脉注射普通肝素进行抗凝治疗,通过抗Xa因子(anti-Xa)水平或活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)进行监测。本研究比较了这两种监测策略在血管外科手术人群中主要出血事件方面的差异。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性研究,纳入了血管外科手术后接受由药房管理的肝素方案治疗的患者,该方案通过anti-Xa或aPTT进行监测。主要结局是术后发生主要出血事件的患者百分比。次要结局评估轻微出血事件、术后红细胞输注情况以及血栓形成事件的发生率。在一项次要分析中,确定并分析同时测量的anti-Xa和aPTT值之间的不一致性。

结果

在anti-Xa监测方案组的72例患者中有12例(17%)发生主要出血,而在aPTT监测方案组的62例患者中有5例(8%)发生主要出血(P = 0.19)。anti-Xa组10%的患者记录有轻微出血事件,而aPTT组为6%(P = 0.54)。两组在红细胞输注和血栓形成事件方面无显著差异。在109对同时测量的anti-Xa和aPTT值中,39对(36%)与相应的anti-Xa水平相比显示aPTT值相对较高。9例出现这些不一致检测结果的患者在根据较低的anti-Xa值调整肝素滴注时发生了出血。

结论

与aPTT监测相比,使用anti-Xa水平进行肝素滴定在血管外科手术患者中显示出更高的主要出血并发症发生率,但本研究未发现显著差异。当根据anti-Xa水平调整肝素时,aPTT与anti-Xa值相对较高的血管外科手术患者可能有更高的出血并发症风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验