Suppr超能文献

比较抗因子 Xa 和活化部分凝血活酶时间水平以监测未分级肝素。

Comparing Anti-Factor Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Levels for Monitoring Unfractionated Heparin.

机构信息

1 Cincinnati Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

2 Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Lexington, KY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2019 Aug;53(8):801-805. doi: 10.1177/1060028019835202. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

Abstract

Lab tests such as activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels are typically used to monitor intravenous unfractionated heparin (IV heparin), with recent evidence suggesting that anti-Xa levels may provide a more accurate measure of anticoagulation. The Lexington Veterans Affairs Health Care System transitioned from using aPTT to anti-Xa levels in January 2017. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this change. This was a retrospective cohort study comparing all patients receiving IV heparin per protocol for at least 24 hours from August 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017 (aPTT group), and February 1, 2017, to July 31, 2017 (anti-Xa group). The primary objective was a comparison of IV heparin doses required to achieve goal range between the 2 cohorts. Secondary objectives included a comparison of time to therapeutic goal, percentage of time within goal range, number of rate changes until therapeutic goal, and adverse outcomes, such as number of bleeds. A total of 155 patients were included in this study. Significantly higher IV heparin doses were required to achieve therapeutic goal in the anti-Xa group, despite significantly fewer IV heparin rate changes required. Anti-Xa monitoring was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Significantly higher IV heparin doses were required to achieve therapeutic anti-Xa levels after transitioning from an aPTT-based protocol in the largely unstudied veteran population. However, the transition from aPTT to anti-Xa monitoring appears safe and efficacious in these patients.

摘要

实验室检测,如激活部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)或抗因子 Xa(anti-Xa)水平,通常用于监测静脉普通肝素(IV 肝素),最近的证据表明,抗 Xa 水平可能提供更准确的抗凝测量。莱克星顿退伍军人事务医疗保健系统于 2017 年 1 月从使用 aPTT 转为使用 anti-Xa 水平。这项研究旨在评估这一变化的疗效和安全性。这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了 2016 年 8 月 1 日至 2017 年 1 月 31 日(aPTT 组)和 2017 年 2 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日(anti-Xa 组)期间至少接受 24 小时 IV 肝素治疗的所有符合方案的患者。主要目的是比较两组达到目标范围所需的 IV 肝素剂量。次要目标包括比较达到治疗目标的时间、目标范围内的时间百分比、达到治疗目标的速度变化次数以及不良结局,如出血次数。本研究共纳入 155 例患者。尽管 anti-Xa 组需要的 IV 肝素速度变化次数明显较少,但为达到治疗目标仍需要更高的 IV 肝素剂量。抗 Xa 监测与不良事件风险增加无关。在退伍军人人群中,从基于 aPTT 的方案转为 anti-Xa 监测后,达到治疗性 anti-Xa 水平所需的 IV 肝素剂量显著增加。然而,在这些患者中,从 aPTT 监测转为 anti-Xa 监测似乎是安全有效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验