Suppr超能文献

接受肝素治疗的重症患者中,活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)与抗Xa活性不一致时的出血结局。

Bleeding outcomes in critically ill patients on heparin with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity.

作者信息

Halawi Hala, Sabawi Mahmoud M, Rizk Elsie, Mahmoud Ahmed A, Petkova Jenny H, Hui Shiu-Ki Rocky, Srour Nina, Donahue Kevin R

机构信息

Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Feb;58(2):210-219. doi: 10.1007/s11239-024-03048-0. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Abstract

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) level via the anti-factor Xa activity assay (anti-Xa) are commonly used assays for UFH monitoring. While discordance between the two assays is common, its impact on critically ill patient outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to compare the incidence of major bleeding events among critically ill patients with discordant aPTT and anti-Xa activity while on UFH, to patients with no discordance. This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of critically ill adult patients who had simultaneous anti-Xa and aPTT levels while receiving continuous UFH infusion. The primary outcome was the incidence of a major bleeding event up to 24 h after UFH discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of 30-day thrombosis and hospital length of stay (LOS). Among 264 included patients, 156 patients (59%) had at least one discordant paired level. Patients with discordance had an increased risk of major bleeding events (14% versus 5%; unadjusted risk ratio, 3.0; 95% CI 1.2-7.8; p = 0.01), and increased risk of thrombotic events (4% versus 0%; p = 0.04). Hospital LOS was similar between the two groups (13.8 days versus 11.4 days; p = 0.08). In this cohort of critically ill patients receiving continuous UFH, discordance in aPTT and anti-Xa activity was frequently observed and was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events. While both assays remain viable monitoring options, evaluating simultaneous levels may aid in the management of critically ill patients. In patients with discordance, an individualized approach balancing bleeding and thrombotic risks should be considered.

摘要

活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和通过抗Xa因子活性测定(抗Xa)得出的普通肝素(UFH)水平是常用于监测UFH的检测方法。虽然这两种检测方法之间的不一致很常见,但其对重症患者预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较接受UFH治疗时aPTT与抗Xa活性不一致的重症患者与无不一致情况的患者之间大出血事件的发生率。这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象为接受持续UFH输注时同时检测抗Xa和aPTT水平的成年重症患者。主要结局是UFH停用后24小时内大出血事件的发生率。次要结局包括30天血栓形成的发生率和住院时间(LOS)。在纳入的264例患者中,156例患者(59%)至少有一对检测结果不一致。结果不一致的患者发生大出血事件的风险增加(14%对5%;未调整风险比,3.0;95%CI 1.2 - 7.8;p = 0.01),血栓形成事件的风险也增加(4%对0%;p = 0.04)。两组患者的住院时间相似(13.8天对11.4天;p = 0.08)。在这一接受持续UFH治疗的重症患者队列中,经常观察到aPTT与抗Xa活性不一致,且这与大出血事件风险增加相关。虽然这两种检测方法仍然是可行的监测选项,但同时评估检测结果可能有助于重症患者的管理。对于结果不一致的患者,应考虑采用平衡出血和血栓形成风险的个体化方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验