Dunlap Samuel S, Aziz M Ashraf, Ziermann Janine M
Independent Researcher, Reston, VA, United States of America.
Howard University College of Medicine, Dept. Anatomy, Washington, DC, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187402. eCollection 2017.
Cruveilhier described in 1834 the human flexor pollicis brevis (FPB), a muscle of the thenar compartment, as having a superficial and a deep head, respectively, inserted onto the radial and ulnar sesamoids of the thumb. Since then, Cruveilhier's deep head has been controversially discussed. Often this deep head is confused with Henle's "interosseous palmaris volaris" or said to be a slip of the oblique adductor pollicis. In the 1960s, Day and Napier described anatomical variations of the insertions of Cruveilhier's deep head, including its absence, and hypothesized, that the shift of the deep head's insertion from ulnar to radial facilitated "true opposability" in anthropoids. Their general thesis for muscular arrangements underlying the power and precision grip is sound, but they did not delineate their deep head from Henle's muscle or the adductor pollicis, and their description of the attachments of Cruveilhier's deep head were too vague and not supported by a significant portion of the anatomical literature. Here, we reinvestigated Cruveilhier's deep head to resolve the controversy about it and because many newer anatomy textbooks do not describe this muscle, while it is often an obvious functionally (writing, texting, precision grip) and clinically significant thenar muscle. For the first time, we empirically delineated Cruveilhier's deep head from neighboring muscles with which it was previously confused. We observed 100% occurrence of the uncontested deep head in 80 human hands, displaying a similar variability of insertions as Day and Napier, but in significantly different numbers. Furthermore, we found variability in the origin and included as important landmarks the trapezoid and the ligamentum carpi radiatum. We tested the assertion regarding the evolutionary morphology and its role in the improvements in thumb movements during various precision grips. Our overall conclusions differ with respect to the developmental and evolutionary origin of the FPB heads.
1834年,克鲁维耶描述了人类拇短屈肌(FPB),即鱼际间隙的一块肌肉,它分别有一个浅头和一个深头,插入到拇指的桡侧和尺侧籽骨上。从那时起,克鲁维耶的深头就一直存在争议。这个深头常常与亨勒的“掌侧骨间掌肌”混淆,或者被认为是拇内收斜肌的一个肌束。20世纪60年代,戴和内皮尔描述了克鲁维耶深头插入部位的解剖变异,包括其缺失情况,并推测深头插入点从尺侧向桡侧的移位促进了类人猿的“真正对掌”。他们关于力量和精确抓握背后肌肉排列的总体论点是合理的,但他们没有将深头与亨勒肌或拇内收肌区分开来,而且他们对克鲁维耶深头附着点的描述过于模糊,也没有得到大量解剖学文献的支持。在这里,我们重新研究了克鲁维耶的深头,以解决关于它的争议,并且因为许多较新的解剖学教科书没有描述这块肌肉,而它在功能上(书写、发短信、精确抓握)和临床上通常是一块明显重要的鱼际肌。我们首次通过实验将克鲁维耶的深头与之前与之混淆的相邻肌肉区分开来。我们在80只人手中观察到无争议的深头出现率为100%,其插入部位的变异情况与戴和内皮尔描述的相似,但数量差异显著。此外,我们发现其起点存在变异,并将大多角骨和桡腕韧带作为重要标志。我们测试了关于进化形态及其在各种精确抓握过程中拇指运动改善中作用的论断。我们关于拇短屈肌各头的发育和进化起源的总体结论有所不同。