Burwell Sasha, Sample Matthew, Racine Eric
Neuroethics Research Unit, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, H2W lR7, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Experimental Medicine and Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, 110 avenue des Pins Ouest, H2W lR7, Montréal, QC, Canada.
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Nov 9;18(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y.
Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is a set of technologies that are of increasing interest to researchers. BCI has been proposed as assistive technology for individuals who are non-communicative or paralyzed, such as those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or spinal cord injury. The technology has also been suggested for enhancement and entertainment uses, and there are companies currently marketing BCI devices for those purposes (e.g., gaming) as well as health-related purposes (e.g., communication). The unprecedented direct connection created by BCI between human brains and computer hardware raises various ethical, social, and legal challenges that merit further examination and discussion.
To identify and characterize the key issues associated with BCI use, we performed a scoping review of biomedical ethics literature, analyzing the ethics concerns cited across multiple disciplines, including philosophy and medicine.
Based on this investigation, we report that BCI research and its potential translation to therapeutic intervention generate significant ethical, legal, and social concerns, notably with regards to personhood, stigma, autonomy, privacy, research ethics, safety, responsibility, and justice. Our review of the literature determined, furthermore, that while these issues have been enumerated extensively, few concrete recommendations have been expressed.
We conclude that future research should focus on remedying a lack of practical solutions to the ethical challenges of BCI, alongside the collection of empirical data on the perspectives of the public, BCI users, and BCI researchers.
脑机接口(BCI)是一组日益受到研究人员关注的技术。BCI已被提议作为针对无交流能力或瘫痪个体的辅助技术,例如肌萎缩侧索硬化症或脊髓损伤患者。该技术也被用于增强和娱乐用途,目前有公司将BCI设备用于这些目的(如游戏)以及与健康相关的目的(如通信)。BCI在人脑与计算机硬件之间建立的前所未有的直接连接引发了各种伦理、社会和法律挑战,值得进一步审视和讨论。
为了识别和描述与BCI使用相关的关键问题,我们对生物医学伦理文献进行了范围综述,分析了多个学科(包括哲学和医学)中提到的伦理问题。
基于这项调查,我们报告称,BCI研究及其向治疗干预的潜在转化引发了重大的伦理、法律和社会问题,特别是在人格、污名、自主性、隐私、研究伦理、安全性、责任和正义方面。此外,我们对文献的综述确定,虽然这些问题已被广泛列举,但很少有具体建议被提出。
我们得出结论,未来的研究应侧重于弥补BCI伦理挑战缺乏实际解决方案的问题,同时收集关于公众、BCI用户和BCI研究人员观点的实证数据。