Agarwal Nayan, Mahmoud Ahmed N, Patel Nimesh Kirit, Jain Ankur, Garg Jalaj, Mojadidi Mohammad Khalid, Agrawal Sahil, Qamar Arman, Golwala Harsh, Gupta Tanush, Bhatia Nirmanmoh, Anderson R David, Bhatt Deepak L
Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;121(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.022. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
Although aspirin monotherapy is considered the standard of care after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), more recent evidence has suggested a benefit with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after CABG. We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of aspirin monotherapy with DAPT in patients after CABG. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to surgical technique (i.e., on vs off pump) and clinical presentation (acute coronary syndrome vs no acute coronary syndrome). Random effects overall risk ratios (RR) were calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird model. Eight randomized control trials and 9 observational studies with a total of 11,135 patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 23 months, major adverse cardiac events (10.3% vs 12.1%, RR 0.84, confidence interval [CI] 0.71 to 0.99), all-cause mortality (5.7% vs 7.0%, RR 0.67, CI 0.48 to 0.94), and graft occlusion (11.3% vs 14.2%, RR 0.79, CI 0.63 to 0.98) were less with DAPT than with aspirin monotherapy. There was no difference in myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding between the 2 groups. In conclusion, DAPT appears to be associated with a reduction in graft occlusion, major adverse cardiac events, and all-cause mortality, without significantly increasing major bleeding compared with aspirin monotherapy in patients undergoing CABG.
尽管阿司匹林单药治疗被认为是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)后的标准治疗方法,但最近的证据表明CABG后双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)有益。我们对观察性研究和随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,比较CABG术后患者阿司匹林单药治疗与DAPT的结果。根据手术技术(即体外循环与非体外循环)和临床表现(急性冠状动脉综合征与无急性冠状动脉综合征)进行亚组分析。使用DerSimonian和Laird模型计算随机效应总体风险比(RR)。纳入了8项随机对照试验和9项观察性研究,共11135例患者。平均随访23个月时,DAPT组的主要不良心脏事件(10.3%对12.1%,RR 0.84,置信区间[CI] 0.71至0.99)、全因死亡率(5.7%对7.0%,RR 0.67,CI 0.48至0.94)和移植血管闭塞(11.3%对14.2%,RR 0.79,CI 0.63至0.98)均低于阿司匹林单药治疗组。两组在心肌梗死、中风或大出血方面无差异。总之,与CABG患者的阿司匹林单药治疗相比,DAPT似乎与移植血管闭塞、主要不良心脏事件和全因死亡率的降低相关,且未显著增加大出血。