Suppr超能文献

先天性膈疝的右侧与左侧——有何差异?

Right versus left congenital diaphragmatic hernia - What's the difference?

作者信息

Burgos Carmen Mesas, Frenckner Björn, Luco Matias, Harting Matthew T, Lally Pamela A, Lally Kevin P

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct 12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.027.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernias (CDH) and bigger defect sizes have been associated with poorer outcomes.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate right- and left-sided CDH in terms of size, survival, associated anomalies, and morbidity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used information from a multicenter, multinational database including patients with CDH born between 2007 and 2015. All infants with data on defect side were included for this analysis. We compared differences in outcomes between right- and left-sided CDH. Further analysis on the association between side, size of the defect, and outcome was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 3754 cases of CDH were entered in the registry between January 2007 and September 2015, with an overall survival of 71%. Of those, 598 (16%) were right-sided and 3156 left-sided, with a survival rate of 67% and 72%, respectively. Right-sided CDH had a larger proportion of C and D defects (p<0.001 and 0.04, respectively). Survival rates for the same size defect were similar, independent of the side of the defect. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with survival as dependent variable identified a significant correlation with defect size, but not side.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher proportion of large defects (C & D) in right-sided CDH, not the side itself, accounts for the reported poorer survival in right-sided CDH.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I for a prognosis study - This is a high-quality, prospective cohort study with 99% of patients followed to the study end point (death or discharge).

摘要

背景

右侧先天性膈疝(CDH)及较大的缺损尺寸与较差的预后相关。

目的

本研究旨在评估右侧和左侧CDH在尺寸、生存率、相关畸形及发病率方面的情况。

材料与方法

我们使用了一个多中心、跨国数据库中的信息,该数据库包含2007年至2015年出生的CDH患者。所有有缺损侧数据的婴儿均纳入本分析。我们比较了右侧和左侧CDH在预后方面的差异。并对缺损侧、缺损大小与预后之间的关联进行了进一步分析。

结果

2007年1月至2015年9月期间,登记在册的CDH病例共有3754例,总体生存率为71%。其中,598例(16%)为右侧,3156例为左侧,生存率分别为67%和72%。右侧CDH中C型和D型缺损的比例更高(分别为p<0.001和0.04)。相同大小缺损的生存率相似,与缺损侧无关。以生存为因变量的多变量逻辑回归分析确定与缺损大小存在显著相关性,但与缺损侧无关。

结论

右侧CDH中较大缺损(C型和D型)比例较高,而非缺损侧本身,是导致右侧CDH报道中生存率较差的原因。

证据水平

预后研究的I级——这是一项高质量的前瞻性队列研究,99%的患者随访至研究终点(死亡或出院)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验