• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代谢综合征高危患者开放式腹疝修补术的安全性:39118 例多机构分析。

Safety of open ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients with metabolic syndrome: a multi-institutional analysis of 39,118 cases.

机构信息

Institute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Feb;14(2):206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.521. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.521
PMID:29122528
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) entails the simultaneous presence of a constellation of dangerous risk factors including obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The prevalence of MetS in Western society continues to rise and implies an elevated risk for surgical complications and/or poor surgical outcomes within the affected population.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risks and outcomes of multi-morbid patients with MetS undergoing open ventral hernia repair.

SETTING

Multi-institutional case-control study in the United States.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was sampled for patients undergoing initial open ventral hernia repair from 2012 through 2014 and then stratified into 2 cohorts based on the presence or absence of MetS. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate preoperative co-morbidities, intraoperative details, and postoperative morbidity and mortality to identify risk factors for adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean age (61.0 versus 56.0 yr, P<.001), body mass index (39.2 versus 31.1, P<.001), and prevalence of co-morbidities of multiple organ systems were significantly higher (P<.001) in the MetS cohort compared to control. Patients with MetS received higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications (81.0% versus 43.1% class 3 or higher, P<.001), were more likely to require operation as emergency cases (11.4% versus 7.2%, P<.001), required longer operative times (103 versus 87 min, P<.001), had longer hospitalizations (3.5 versus 2.4 d, P<.001), and had more contaminated wounds (15.9% versus 12.0% class 2 or higher, P<.001). Overall, they had more medical (7.5% versus 4.2%, P<.001), and surgical complications (9.7% versus 5.4%, P<.001), experienced more readmissions (8.3% versus 5.7%, P<.001) and reoperations (3.4% versus 2.5%, P<.001), and were at higher risk for eventual death (.8% versus .5%, P=.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of MetS is related to a multitude of unfavorable outcomes and increased mortality after open ventral hernia repair compared with a non-MetS control group. MetS is a useful marker for high operative risk in a population that is generally prone to obesity and its associated diseases.

摘要

背景

代谢综合征(MetS)涉及一系列危险风险因素的同时存在,包括肥胖、糖尿病、高血压和血脂异常。代谢综合征在西方社会的患病率持续上升,这意味着在受影响人群中,手术并发症和/或不良手术结果的风险增加。

目的

评估患有代谢综合征的多合并症患者行开放性腹疝修补术的风险和结果。

设置

美国多机构病例对照研究。

方法

从 2012 年至 2014 年,美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库中抽取了接受初次开放性腹疝修补术的患者,并根据是否存在代谢综合征将其分为 2 个队列。进行统计分析以评估术前合并症、术中细节以及术后发病率和死亡率,以确定不良结果的危险因素。

结果

与对照组相比,代谢综合征组的平均年龄(61.0 岁与 56.0 岁,P<.001)、体重指数(39.2 与 31.1,P<.001)和多器官系统合并症的患病率显著更高(P<.001)。代谢综合征组的患者接受了更高的美国麻醉医师协会分类(81.0%与 43.1%为 3 级或更高级别,P<.001),更有可能需要作为急症手术(11.4%与 7.2%,P<.001),需要更长的手术时间(103 分钟与 87 分钟,P<.001),住院时间更长(3.5 天与 2.4 天,P<.001),并且污染伤口更多(15.9%与 12.0%为 2 级或更高,P<.001)。总体而言,他们的医疗并发症更多(7.5%与 4.2%,P<.001),手术并发症更多(9.7%与 5.4%,P<.001),再入院率更高(8.3%与 5.7%,P<.001)和再次手术率更高(3.4%与 2.5%,P<.001),最终死亡风险更高(0.8%与 0.5%,P=.008)。

结论

与非代谢综合征对照组相比,患有代谢综合征的患者在开放性腹疝修补术后存在多种不良结局和更高的死亡率。代谢综合征是一个有用的标志物,用于评估肥胖及其相关疾病高发人群的高手术风险。

相似文献

1
Safety of open ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients with metabolic syndrome: a multi-institutional analysis of 39,118 cases.代谢综合征高危患者开放式腹疝修补术的安全性:39118 例多机构分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Feb;14(2):206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.521. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
2
Association of Metabolic Derangement and Postoperative Outcomes in Hernia Repair With Component Separation: A Propensity Score-Matched Nationwide Analysis.疝修补术联合成分分离术中代谢紊乱与术后结局的关联:一项倾向评分匹配的全国性分析
J Surg Res. 2024 Sep;301:136-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.046. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Mortality after inpatient open ventral hernia repair: developing a risk stratification tool based on 55,760 operations.住院患者开放性腹疝修补术后的死亡率:基于55760例手术开发风险分层工具。
Am J Surg. 2016 Jun;211(6):1047-57. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 May 23.
4
Impact of body mass index on open ventral hernia repair: A retrospective review.体重指数对开放性腹疝修补术的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Surgery. 2017 Dec;162(6):1320-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
5
Postoperative outcomes of ventral hernia repair in veterans.退伍军人的腹疝修补术后结果。
Surgery. 2021 Mar;169(3):603-609. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
National results after ventral hernia repair.腹疝修补术后的全国性结果。
Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7).
7
Outcomes of acute versus elective primary ventral hernia repair.急性与择期原发性腹侧疝修补术的结果比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):523-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0743.
8
Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair.猪脱细胞真皮基质与合成补片及缝线用于复杂开放性腹疝修补术的疗效比较
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Oct;15(5):506-12. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.090. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
9
The cost of preventable comorbidities on wound complications in open ventral hernia repair.可预防的合并症对开放性腹疝修补术后伤口并发症的影响
J Surg Res. 2016 Nov;206(1):214-222. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Extending the value of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program claims dataset to study long-term outcomes: Rate of repeat ventral hernia repair.扩展国家外科质量改进计划索赔数据集的价值以研究长期结局:复发性腹疝修补率
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1157-65. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Midline incisional hernia guidelines: the European Hernia Society.中线切口疝指南:欧洲疝学会
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1732-1768. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad284.
2
Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and Frailty: Is There any Room for Good Outcome in the Elderly Undergoing Emergency Surgery?代谢综合征(MetS)、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)与衰弱:急诊手术老年患者获得良好预后的可能性如何?
Front Surg. 2022 Jun 15;9:870082. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.870082. eCollection 2022.
3
Excess Body Weight and Abdominal Hernia.
超重与腹疝
Visc Med. 2021 Aug;37(4):246-253. doi: 10.1159/000516047. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
4
Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/m: outcomes based on an institutional algorithm.BMI 大于 30kg/m2 的患者的腹疝管理:基于机构算法的结果。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02318-z. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
Frailty predicts morbidity, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction.虚弱预测接受复杂腹壁重建的患者的发病率、并发症和死亡率。
Hernia. 2020 Apr;24(2):235-243. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02047-y. Epub 2019 Sep 18.