• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BMI 大于 30kg/m2 的患者的腹疝管理:基于机构算法的结果。

Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/m: outcomes based on an institutional algorithm.

机构信息

Belle Vue Clinic, 9 and 10, Loudon street, Kolkata, India.

出版信息

Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02318-z. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-020-02318-z
PMID:33044608
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Management of ventral hernia in obese is a complex problem. The methods of weight loss, alternatives if the patient cannot undergo bariatric surgery, timing, and type of hernia surgery lacks clarity and are dependent on resources and expertise. There is a need for algorithms based on local population and expertise. In this paper, we present the outcomes of our institutional algorithm.

METHODS

It was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 30Kg/m were included to undergo surgery as per algorithm taking into account (a) presentation (symptomatic vs asymptomatic), (b) hernia characteristics (defect width, site, reducibility), and (c) obesity characteristics (BMI, subcutaneous fat, android vs gynecoid). Data on age, BMI, comorbidities, tobacco consumption, hernia width, location, contents, previous surgery, intraoperative parameters (the type of surgery, mesh, drain, fixation), and outcomes (seroma, hematoma, infection, recurrence) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients underwent treatment as per the algorithm. Mean BMI was 36.6 ± 7.3 kg/m. The mean follow-up was 17.6 ± 7.2 months. The mean defect width was 4.8 ± 2.9 cm. There were two (4%) recurrences in patients who underwent an anatomical repair under emergency conditions. None of the patients who underwent an elective repair had a recurrence. Total surgical site occurrence was 12% and surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention was 8%. There was one (2%) mortality on postoperative day 7 due to myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

The algorithm has shown encouraging results in the short-to-medium term. Long-term evaluation with a higher number of patients is needed to confirm its usefulness.

摘要

引言

肥胖患者的腹疝管理是一个复杂的问题。减重方法、无法接受减重手术患者的替代方法、手术时机和疝手术类型缺乏明确性,且取决于资源和专业知识。需要根据当地人群和专业知识制定算法。本文介绍了我们机构算法的结果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性收集数据的回顾性分析。纳入 BMI>30kg/m 的患者,根据算法进行手术,同时考虑(a)表现(有症状与无症状)、(b)疝特征(缺损宽度、部位、可复性)和(c)肥胖特征(BMI、皮下脂肪、男性型或女性型)。收集患者的年龄、BMI、合并症、吸烟情况、疝宽度、位置、内容物、既往手术、术中参数(手术类型、网片、引流管、固定方式)和结局(血清肿、血肿、感染、复发)。

结果

共有 50 名患者根据算法接受了治疗。平均 BMI 为 36.6±7.3kg/m。平均随访时间为 17.6±7.2 个月。平均缺损宽度为 4.8±2.9cm。在紧急情况下行解剖修复的患者中有 2 例(4%)复发。择期修复的患者无一例复发。总手术部位并发症发生率为 12%,需要手术干预的手术部位并发症发生率为 8%。术后第 7 天因心肌梗死导致 1 例(2%)死亡。

结论

该算法在短期至中期显示出令人鼓舞的结果。需要长期评估更多患者以确认其有用性。

相似文献

1
Management of ventral hernia in patients with BMI > 30 Kg/m: outcomes based on an institutional algorithm.BMI 大于 30kg/m2 的患者的腹疝管理:基于机构算法的结果。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):689-699. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02318-z. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
2
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with composite mesh: Analysis of risk factors for recurrence in 185 patients with 5 years follow-up.腹腔镜下腹膜前疝修补术复合补片:5 年随访 185 例患者复发的危险因素分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
3
Is there an advantage to laparoscopy over open repair of primary umbilical hernias in obese patients? An analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC).肥胖患者中,与开放性修补相比,腹腔镜修补原发性脐疝是否有优势?美国疝学会质量协作组(AHSQC)的分析。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):579-585. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02218-2. Epub 2020 May 23.
4
Postoperative complications as an independent risk factor for recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective study of 417 patients with long-term follow-up.术后并发症作为腹腔镜腹疝修补术后复发的独立危险因素:一项对417例患者进行长期随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1469-1477. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5140-2. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
Peritoneal Flap Hernioplasty for Reconstruction of Large Ventral Hernias: Long-Term Outcome in 251 Patients.经腹膜瓣修补术治疗大型腹外疝:251 例患者的长期疗效。
World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2157-2163. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05011-0.
6
Laparoscopic treatment of incisional and primary ventral hernia in morbidly obese patients with a BMI over 35.对体重指数(BMI)超过35的病态肥胖患者进行腹腔镜下切口疝和原发性腹疝治疗。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3310-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3607-6. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Morbid obesity with ventral hernia: is concomitant bariatric surgery with laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair the best approach? An experience of over 150 cases.病态肥胖伴腹疝:同期行减重手术联合腹腔镜腹疝补片修补术是否为最佳治疗策略?一项超过 150 例病例的经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jul;15(7):1098-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 2.
8
Long-term clinical experience with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a ParietexTM composite mesh in severely obese and non-severe obese patients: a single center cohort study.使用ParietexTM复合补片对重度肥胖和非重度肥胖患者进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术的长期临床经验:一项单中心队列研究
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Oct;28(5):304-308. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1521431. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
9
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primary fascial closure versus bridged repair: a risk-adjusted comparative study.腹腔镜下腹壁疝修补术:一期筋膜闭合与桥接修补的风险调整比较研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3231-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4644-5. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Outcomes of concomitant ventral hernia repair performed during bariatric surgery.减肥手术期间同期进行腹侧疝修补术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5143-z. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Obesity-focused prehabilitation strategies in ventral hernia: Cohort study.腹疝中以肥胖为重点的术前康复策略:队列研究。
Hernia. 2025 Jun 11;29(1):202. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03392-x.
2
A retrospective cohort study of laparoscopic enhanced view totally extra-peritoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair of incisional ventral hernias in patients with morbid obesity.一项针对病态肥胖患者腹腔镜增强视野完全腹膜外Rives-Stoppa(eTEP-RS)修补切口疝的回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):2099-2107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11565-z. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
3
Comment to: Subcutaneous fat thickness predicts postoperative seroma following laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal hernioplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of concomitant mesh placement and intestinal procedures during open ventral hernia repair.开放式腹疝修补术中同时进行网片放置和肠道手术的结果。
Hernia. 2021 Jun;25(3):701-708. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02332-1. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
COVID-19 and Obesity: Is Bariatric Surgery Protective? Retrospective Analysis on 2145 Patients Undergone Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery from High Volume Center in Italy (Lombardy).2019冠状病毒病与肥胖症:减重手术具有保护作用吗?对意大利(伦巴第大区)一家大型中心2145例接受减重代谢手术患者的回顾性分析
Obes Surg. 2021 Mar;31(3):942-948. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05085-z. Epub 2020 Oct 31.
3
Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.
对《皮下脂肪厚度预测腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术后血清肿》的评论
Hernia. 2024 Dec 3;29(1):41. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03199-2.
4
The effect of clinically significant weight loss prior to open ventral hernia repair.临床显著体重减轻对开放性腹疝修补术的影响。
Hernia. 2024 Nov 16;29(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03208-4.
5
Machine learning, deep learning and hernia surgery. Are we pushing the limits of abdominal core health? A qualitative systematic review.机器学习、深度学习与疝外科:我们是否正在超越腹壁核心健康的极限?一项定性系统评价
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1405-1412. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03069-x. Epub 2024 May 18.
6
Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus.印度腹外疝修补术:德尔菲共识。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1511-1523. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03062-4. Epub 2024 May 9.
7
Obesity increases the surgical complexity and risk of recurrence after midline primary ventral hernia repair: results on 2307 patients from the French Society of hernia surgery (SFCP-CH) registry database.肥胖增加了中线原发性腹疝修补术后的手术复杂性和复发风险:来自法国疝外科学会(SFCP-CH)注册数据库的 2307 例患者的结果。
Hernia. 2024 Jun;28(3):779-788. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02875-z. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
8
Association of body mass index with morbidity following elective ventral hernia repair.择期腹疝修补术后体重指数与发病率的关系
Surg Open Sci. 2023 Jun 17;14:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2023.06.005. eCollection 2023 Aug.
腹腔镜治疗腹前壁和切口疝指南更新(国际腹内疝学会(IEHS))-A 部分。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3069-3139. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06907-7. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Morbid obesity with ventral hernia: is concomitant bariatric surgery with laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair the best approach? An experience of over 150 cases.病态肥胖伴腹疝:同期行减重手术联合腹腔镜腹疝补片修补术是否为最佳治疗策略?一项超过 150 例病例的经验。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Jul;15(7):1098-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Safety of open ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients with metabolic syndrome: a multi-institutional analysis of 39,118 cases.代谢综合征高危患者开放式腹疝修补术的安全性:39118 例多机构分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Feb;14(2):206-213. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.521. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
The trend toward minimally invasive complex abdominal wall reconstruction: is it worth it?微创复杂腹壁重建的趋势:值得吗?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1701-1707. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5850-0. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
7
Concomitant Panniculectomy Affects Wound Morbidity but Not Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.同期行腹壁成形术对腹壁重建术后伤口并发症有影响,但对疝复发率无影响:一项倾向评分分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6):1263-1273. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003855.
8
The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study.体重指数对腹壁重建结果的影响:一项比较研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1234-1244. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003264.
9
Outcomes of concomitant ventral hernia repair performed during bariatric surgery.减肥手术期间同期进行腹侧疝修补术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5143-z. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
10
Total Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Component Separation, Reinforcement, and Vertical Abdominoplasty in Patients with Complex Ventral Hernias.复杂腹疝患者采用腹壁各层分离、加强及垂直腹壁成形术进行全腹壁重建。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;40(3):387-94. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0628-7. Epub 2016 Mar 2.