An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
作者信息
Hoge S K, Appelbaum P S, Greer A
机构信息
University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Department of Psychiatry, Worcester 01605.
出版信息
Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Feb;146(2):170-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.2.170.
PMID:2912258
Abstract
Massachusetts civil commitment criteria were compared in an emergency setting with a set of criteria developed by Dr. Alan Stone. Contrary to expectations, the Stone criteria proved to be more restrictive in a sample of 503 patients. Few patients would be newly committable under the Stone criteria; of the 35 patients committable under the Stone standard, 32 also met the current Massachusetts criteria for commitment. The clinical and policy implications of the adoption of the Stone criteria are discussed.
摘要
相似文献
1
An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Feb;146(2):170-5. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.2.170.
2
Limitations on psychiatrists' discretionary civil commitment authority by the Stone and dangerousness criteria.《斯通标准》及危险性标准对精神科医生任意民事拘押权的限制。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988 Aug;45(8):764-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320080011.
3
Commitment: the consistency of clinicians and the use of legal standards.承诺：临床医生的一致性及法律标准的运用。
Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Feb;146(2):176-81. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.2.176.
4
Predictive validity of judgments of dangerousness in emergency civil commitment.
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Feb;144(2):197-200. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.2.197.
5
Short-term civil commitment and the violent patient.短期民事收容与暴力患者
Am J Psychiatry. 1982 Sep;139(9):1145-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.139.9.1145.
6
Stone-Roth model of civil commitment and the California dangerousness standard: operational comparison.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;39(11):1267-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290110029005.
7
Redefining dangerousness for civil commitment.重新定义民事收容的危险性。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1987 Aug;38(8):884-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.38.8.884.
8
Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?再探唐纳森案：危险性是否是民事收押的宪法要求？
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1998;26(3):343-51.
9
An empirical study of emergency commitment.紧急住院治疗的实证研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1989 Feb;146(2):182-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.146.2.182.
10
Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1980;3(4):405-19. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(80)90025-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Compulsory admission of mentally ill patients in European Union Member States.欧盟成员国中精神病患者的强制收治
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;39(10):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s00127-004-0814-9.
Zotero 插件