Birkun Alexei, Glotov Maksim
Department of Anaesthesiology, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Medical Academy named after S. I. Georgievsky of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol 295051, Russian Federation.
World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(4):245-252. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.04.001.
To summarise and appraise cumulative published scientific evidence relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education in Russia.
We searched Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Russian Science Citation Index databases from December 1991 to December 2016 to identify studies pertaining to the field of CPR education that were carried out by Russian researchers and/or investigated the topic of interest for Russia/Russian population. Reference lists of eligible publications, contents pages of relevant Russian journals and Google Scholar were also searched. There was no limitation based on publication language or study design.
Of 7 964 unique citations identified, 22 studies were included. All studies were published from 2009 to 2016, mainly in Russian. Only three studies were reported to be randomized controlled. Non-medical individuals constituted 17% of studied populations. Most of the studies aimed to assess effects of CPR educational interventions, generally suggesting positive influence of the training conducted. The studies were highly heterogeneous as for methodological approaches, structure and duration of educational interventions, evaluation methods and criteria being used. Methodological quality was generally poor, with >40% publications not passing quality screening and only 2 studies meeting the criteria of moderate high quality.
The results suggest paucity, low population coverage, high thematic and methodological heterogeneity and low quality of the studies addressing CPR education, which were carried out in the Russian Federation. There is a critical need in conducting methodologically consistent, large-scale, randomized, controlled studies evaluating and comparing efficiency of educational interventions for teaching CPR in different population categories of Russia.
总结和评估俄罗斯心肺复苏(CPR)教育方面已发表的累积科学证据。
我们检索了1991年12月至2016年12月期间的Medline、Scopus、Science Direct和俄罗斯科学引文索引数据库,以识别俄罗斯研究人员开展的与CPR教育领域相关的研究,以及/或者调查俄罗斯/俄罗斯人群感兴趣主题的研究。还检索了符合条件出版物的参考文献列表、相关俄罗斯期刊的目录页以及谷歌学术。不限出版物语言或研究设计。
在识别出的7964条独特引文中,纳入了22项研究。所有研究均发表于2009年至2016年,主要为俄语。据报道仅有三项研究为随机对照研究。非医疗人员占研究人群的17%。大多数研究旨在评估CPR教育干预的效果,总体表明所开展培训具有积极影响。这些研究在方法学方法、教育干预的结构和时长、所使用的评估方法和标准方面高度异质性。方法学质量总体较差,超过40%的出版物未通过质量筛选,仅有两项研究符合中等高质量标准。
结果表明,俄罗斯联邦开展的有关CPR教育的研究数量稀少、人群覆盖度低、主题和方法学异质性高且质量低。迫切需要开展方法学上一致的、大规模的、随机对照研究,以评估和比较针对俄罗斯不同人群类别进行CPR教学的教育干预的效果。