Suppr超能文献

需要紧急剖腹手术的失血性休克腹部创伤患者的治疗结果:主动脉内球囊阻断术的疗效

Outcomes of abdominal trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock requiring emergency laparotomy: efficacy of intra-aortic balloon occlusion.

作者信息

Kunitatsu Kosei, Ueda Kentaro, Iwasaki Yasuhiro, Yamazoe Shinji, Yonemitsu Takafumi, Kawazoe Yu, Kawashima Syuji, Shibata Naoaki, Kato Seiya

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Wakayama Medical University School of Medicine Wakayama Japan.

出版信息

Acute Med Surg. 2016 May 10;3(4):345-350. doi: 10.1002/ams2.212. eCollection 2016 Oct.

Abstract

AIM

The aims of this study were to investigate outcomes of abdominal trauma in patients with hemorrhagic shock requiring emergency laparotomy and clarify the beneficial effects of intra-aortic balloon occlusion (IABO) for intra-abdominal hemorrhage in patients with critically uncontrollable hemorrhagic shock (CUHS).

METHODS

We reviewed 44 hemorrhagic shock patients who underwent emergency laparotomy for intra-abdominal hemorrhage over a 6-year period. Of these patients, we examined data for 19 subjects who underwent IABO during initial resuscitation to control massive intra-abdominal bleeding leading to CUHS.

RESULTS

The average Injury Severity Score and probability of survival (Ps) of the 44 patients were 27.6 ± 15.4 and 0.735 ± 0.304, respectively, and the overall survival rate was 77.3%. The differences in the Glasgow Coma Scale, lactate level, prothrombin time - international normalized ratio, and Ps between the two groups (21 responders and 23 non-responders) were statistically significant ( < 0.05). Intra-aortic balloon occlusion was attempted in 19 of 23 patients (82.6%) with CUHS, and there were no statistically significant differences in presenting Glasgow Coma Scale, body temperature, lactate, prothrombin time - international normalized ratio, or Revised Trauma Score between the survivors ( = 12) and non-survivors ( = 7). The only significant differences between these two groups were observed in Injury Severity Score ( = 0.047) and Ps ( = 0.007). In all patients, the balloons were successfully placed in 8.1 ± 3.3 min in the thoracic aorta, and a significant increase in systolic blood pressure was observed immediately after IABO.

CONCLUSION

The IABO procedure can be life-saving in the management of patients with CUHS arising from intra-abdominal hemorrhage, permitting transport to surgery.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查需要紧急剖腹手术的失血性休克患者腹部创伤的结局,并阐明主动脉内球囊阻断术(IABO)对严重难以控制的失血性休克(CUHS)患者腹腔内出血的有益作用。

方法

我们回顾了44例在6年期间因腹腔内出血接受紧急剖腹手术的失血性休克患者。在这些患者中,我们检查了19例在初始复苏期间接受IABO以控制导致CUHS的大量腹腔内出血的受试者的数据。

结果

44例患者的平均损伤严重度评分和生存概率(Ps)分别为27.6±15.4和0.735±0.304,总生存率为77.3%。两组(21例反应者和23例无反应者)在格拉斯哥昏迷量表、乳酸水平、凝血酶原时间-国际标准化比值和Ps方面的差异具有统计学意义(<0.05)。23例CUHS患者中有19例(82.6%)尝试了主动脉内球囊阻断术,幸存者(n=12)和非幸存者(n=7)在出现时的格拉斯哥昏迷量表、体温、乳酸、凝血酶原时间-国际标准化比值或修订创伤评分方面无统计学显著差异。这两组之间唯一的显著差异在于损伤严重度评分(P=0.047)和Ps(P=0.007)。在所有患者中,球囊在胸主动脉成功放置的时间为8.1±3.3分钟,IABO后立即观察到收缩压显著升高。

结论

IABO手术在处理由腹腔内出血引起的CUHS患者时可挽救生命,有助于转运至手术室进行手术。

相似文献

3
Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock.
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Jan 6;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-10-1. eCollection 2015.
4
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for non-traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):713-718. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0973-0. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
6
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage in the abdomen and pelvis.
Am J Surg. 2016 Dec;212(6):1222-1230. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
8
Intra-aortic balloon occlusion catheter for treating hemorrhagic shock after massive duodenal ulcer bleeding.
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):473.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.024. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
10
Treatment of intra-abdominal haemorrhagic shock by Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA).
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Feb;34(1):53-5. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2014.07.002. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Traumatic Cardiac Arrest: Scoping Review of Utilization of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 16;9:888225. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.888225. eCollection 2022.
4
Application value of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in the evaluation of traumatic shock.
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Jun;17(6):4586-4592. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7492. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: current evidence.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 14;11:29-38. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S166087. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta might be dangerous in patients with severe torso trauma: A propensity score analysis.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Apr;80(4):559-66; discussion 566-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000968.
3
Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):897-903; discussion 904. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000614.
5
Retrospective study of the effectiveness of Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion (IABO) for traumatic haemorrhagic shock.
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Jan 6;10(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-10-1. eCollection 2015.
6
A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Sep;75(3):506-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829e5416.
7
10
Emergency thoracotomy saves lives in a Scandinavian hospital setting.
J Trauma. 2010 Mar;68(3):599-603. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5ec54.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验