Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, 202 Psychology Building, Memphis, TN, 38152, USA.
J Gambl Stud. 2018 Jun;34(2):617-630. doi: 10.1007/s10899-017-9733-z.
Premature termination challenges the successful outcomes of psychological treatments for gambling disorder. To date, research has primarily identified clients who are at particular risk for dropping out of treatment. A smaller but growing body of literature has investigated when dropout occurs. Typically, those studies have not considered improvement in psychological distress within their operationalizations of dropout and therefore may have misrepresented when dropout occurs. The current study examined when dropout occurs using an operationalization based on the criteria of attaining reliable change in a naturalistic sample of clients with gambling disorder, and the classification rates yielded from that operationalization were compared to the rates from a more common operationalization. Participants (n = 334) were clients meeting diagnostic criteria for gambling disorder at an outpatient private practice who completed a measure of psychological distress at baseline and prior to each subsequent treatment session. A survival analysis was conducted to determine temporal patterns of treatment dropout (i.e., clients who discontinued treatment before realizing reliable changes in psychological distress) and completion (i.e., clients who discontinued treatment after realizing reliable changes in distress) at each treatment session. Forty-nine percent of clients were classified as dropouts, and the majority of those clients did so in the first few sessions. The more common operationalization of dropout classified clients as dropouts when they had improved in their distress and clients as completers when they had not improved in their distress. Discussion centers on the implications of dropout occurring at various stages of treatment and future directions.
过早终止会影响赌博障碍心理治疗的成功结果。迄今为止,研究主要确定了那些特别有可能中途退出治疗的客户。但越来越多的文献研究了何时会出现退出情况。通常情况下,这些研究并没有考虑到在退出的操作定义中,心理困扰的改善,因此可能错误地描述了退出的时间。本研究使用基于赌博障碍自然样本中达到可靠变化标准的操作定义来检验何时出现退出情况,并将该操作定义得出的分类率与更常见的操作定义得出的分类率进行比较。参与者(n=334)是在私人门诊接受赌博障碍诊断标准的客户,他们在基线和每次后续治疗前都完成了一项心理困扰测量。进行了生存分析,以确定治疗退出(即,在心理困扰实现可靠变化之前停止治疗的客户)和完成(即,在实现可靠变化后停止治疗的客户)在每个治疗阶段的时间模式。49%的客户被归类为退出者,其中大多数客户在最初的几次治疗中就退出了。更常见的退出操作定义将那些在困扰中有所改善的客户归类为退出者,而将那些在困扰中没有改善的客户归类为完成者。讨论集中在治疗各个阶段出现退出的影响以及未来的方向。