Suppr超能文献

图片命名中的语义干扰焦点:来自双重任务表现的证据。

Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.

机构信息

Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):147-65. doi: 10.1037/a0033745. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

Abstract

Disagreement exists regarding the functional locus of semantic interference of distractor words in picture naming. This effect is a cornerstone of modern psycholinguistic models of word production, which assume that it arises in lexical response-selection. However, recent evidence from studies of dual-task performance suggests a locus in perceptual or conceptual processing, prior to lexical response-selection. In these studies, participants manually responded to a tone and named a picture while ignoring a written distractor word. The stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between tone and picture-word stimulus was manipulated. Semantic interference in naming latencies was present at long tone pre-exposure SOAs, but reduced or absent at short SOAs. Under the prevailing structural or strategic response-selection bottleneck and central capacity sharing models of dual-task performance, the underadditivity of the effects of SOA and stimulus type suggests that semantic interference emerges before lexical response-selection. However, in more recent studies, additive effects of SOA and stimulus type were obtained. Here, we examined the discrepancy in results between these studies in 6 experiments in which we systematically manipulated various dimensions on which these earlier studies differed, including tasks, materials, stimulus types, and SOAs. In all our experiments, additive effects of SOA and stimulus type on naming latencies were obtained. These results strongly suggest that the semantic interference effect arises after perceptual and conceptual processing, during lexical response-selection or later. We discuss several theoretical alternatives with respect to their potential to account for the discrepancy between the present results and other studies showing underadditivity.

摘要

关于干扰词在图片命名中语义干扰的功能位置存在分歧。这种效应是现代心理语言学词汇产生模型的基石,这些模型假设它出现在词汇反应选择中。然而,来自双任务表现研究的最新证据表明,它位于词汇反应选择之前的感知或概念处理中。在这些研究中,参与者手动响应一个音调并命名一个图片,同时忽略一个书面干扰词。音调与图片-单词刺激之间的刺激起始时间间隔(SOA)被操纵。在长 SOA 预暴露时,命名潜伏期存在语义干扰,但在短 SOA 时减少或不存在。在双任务表现的主流结构或策略反应选择瓶颈和中央容量共享模型下,SOA 和刺激类型的效应的非加性表明语义干扰出现在词汇反应选择之前。然而,在最近的研究中,获得了 SOA 和刺激类型的加性效应。在这里,我们在 6 项实验中检查了这些研究结果之间的差异,在这些实验中,我们系统地操纵了这些早期研究中不同的各种维度,包括任务、材料、刺激类型和 SOA。在我们所有的实验中,SOA 和刺激类型对命名潜伏期的加性效应都得到了。这些结果强烈表明,语义干扰效应出现在感知和概念处理之后,在词汇反应选择期间或之后。我们讨论了几个理论替代方案,以说明它们与其他显示非加性的研究结果之间的差异的潜在原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验