Carlson Jenna C, Standley Jennifer, Petrin Aline, Shaffer John R, Butali Azeez, Buxó Carmen J, Castilla Eduardo, Christensen Kaare, Deleyiannis Frederic W-D, Hecht Jacqueline T, Field L Leigh, Garidkhuu Ariuntuul, Moreno Uribe Lina M, Nagato Natsume, Orioli Ieda M, Padilla Carmencita, Poletta Fernando, Suzuki Satoshi, Vieira Alexandre R, Wehby George L, Weinberg Seth M, Beaty Terri H, Feingold Eleanor, Murray Jeffrey C, Marazita Mary L, Leslie Elizabeth J
Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America.
Genet Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;41(8):887-897. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22090. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Orofacial clefts (OFCs) are common, complex birth defects with extremely heterogeneous phenotypic presentations. Two common subtypes-cleft lip alone (CL) and CL plus cleft palate (CLP)-are typically grouped into a single phenotype for genetic analysis (i.e., CL with or without cleft palate, CL/P). However, mounting evidence suggests there may be unique underlying pathophysiology and/or genetic modifiers influencing expression of these two phenotypes. To this end, we performed a genome-wide scan for genetic modifiers by directly comparing 450 CL cases with 1,692 CLP cases from 18 recruitment sites across 13 countries from North America, Central or South America, Asia, Europe, and Africa. We identified a region on 16q21 that is strongly associated with different cleft type (P = 5.611 × 10 ). We also identified significant evidence of gene-gene interactions between this modifier locus and two recognized CL/P risk loci: 8q21 and 9q22 (FOXE1) (P = 0.012 and 0.023, respectively). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in the 16q21 modifier locus demonstrated significant association with CL over CLP. The marker alleles on 16q21 that increased risk for CL were found at highest frequencies among individuals with a family history of CL (P = 0.003). Our results demonstrate the existence of modifiers for which type of OFC develops and suggest plausible elements responsible for phenotypic heterogeneity, further elucidating the complex genetic architecture of OFCs.
口面部裂隙(OFCs)是常见的复杂出生缺陷,具有极其异质的表型表现。两种常见的亚型——单纯唇裂(CL)和唇裂合并腭裂(CLP)——在遗传分析中通常被归为单一表型(即有或无腭裂的CL,CL/P)。然而,越来越多的证据表明,可能存在独特的潜在病理生理学和/或基因修饰因子影响这两种表型的表达。为此,我们通过直接比较来自北美、中南美、亚洲、欧洲和非洲13个国家18个招募地点的450例CL病例和1692例CLP病例,进行了全基因组扫描以寻找基因修饰因子。我们在16q21上鉴定出一个与不同腭裂类型强烈相关的区域(P = 5.611×10)。我们还发现了该修饰位点与两个公认的CL/P风险位点:8q21和9q22(FOXE1)之间存在基因-基因相互作用的显著证据(分别为P = 0.012和0.023)。16q21修饰位点的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)显示与CL相比,CLP与之有显著关联。在有CL家族史的个体中,16q21上增加CL风险的标记等位基因频率最高(P = 0.003)。我们的结果证明了存在影响OFC发生类型的修饰因子,并提示了可能导致表型异质性的因素,进一步阐明了OFCs复杂的遗传结构。