Tehrany Rokhsaneh, DeVos Ruth, Bruton Anne
a Faculty of Health Sciences, Highfield Campus , University of Southampton, Southampton , UK.
b Respiratory Centre, C- Level , Queen Alexandra Hospital , Portsmouth , UK.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Apr;34(4):329-335. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1400139. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
Breathing retraining (BR) improves symptoms, psychological well-being and quality of life in adults with asthma; but there remains uncertainty as to mechanism of effect. One of the intuitively logical theories is that BR works through altering breathing pattern. There is currently no evidence, however, that BR does result in measurable changes in breathing pattern. In this case report we describe the effects of physiotherapy BR on a 57-year-old female with a 10-year history of asthma. Data were collected before and after a physiotherapy BR program comprising three sessions over 18 weeks: breathing pattern (respiratory inductive plethysmography (RIP); physiology (end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO), heart rate, oxygen saturations, spirometric lung function); questionnaires (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, Nijmegen Questionnaire); and medication usage. After BR, the patient's symptoms improved. Her physiology was largely unchanged, although her FEV increased by 0.12L, peak flow by 21L/min. The patient reported using less Salbutamol, yet her asthma control improved (ACQ down 1.5). Her Nijmegen score dropped from positive to negative for hyperventilation (from 39 to 7). Her anxiety-depression levels both reduced into 'normal' ranges. The patient's expiratory time increased, with longer respiratory cycles and slower respiratory rate. No changes were seen in relative contributions of ribcage and abdomen. Controlled trials are now needed to determine the generalizability of these findings.
呼吸再训练(BR)可改善哮喘成年患者的症状、心理健康和生活质量;但其作用机制仍不明确。一种直观合理的理论是,BR通过改变呼吸模式起作用。然而,目前尚无证据表明BR确实会导致呼吸模式发生可测量的变化。在本病例报告中,我们描述了物理治疗BR对一名有10年哮喘病史的57岁女性的影响。在一个为期18周、包含三个疗程的物理治疗BR项目前后收集数据:呼吸模式(呼吸感应体积描记法(RIP));生理学指标(呼气末二氧化碳(ETCO)、心率、血氧饱和度、肺功能仪测定的肺功能);问卷调查(哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)、医院焦虑抑郁量表、奈梅亨问卷);以及药物使用情况。BR治疗后,患者症状改善。其生理学指标基本未变,不过其第一秒用力呼气容积增加了0.12L,呼气峰值流速增加了21L/分钟。患者报告使用沙丁胺醇的量减少,但其哮喘控制情况有所改善(ACQ降低了1.5)。她的奈梅亨问卷评分从通气过度阳性变为阴性(从39降至7)。她的焦虑和抑郁水平均降至“正常”范围。患者的呼气时间增加,呼吸周期变长,呼吸频率变慢。胸廓和腹部的相对贡献未见变化。现在需要进行对照试验来确定这些发现的普遍性。